From Worst to First to Worst (How I Wound Up in Row 34)
#31
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,748
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by avek00:
The service was good for whom venk?
</font>
The service was good for whom venk?
</font>
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">I dare say that most COers would NOT support such CS moves over the long-term, as it invariably leads to the chaos that is currently United Airlines.
</font>
</font>
Anyone?
#32
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SJC
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 3,686
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by avek00:
I dare say that most COers would NOT support such CS moves over the long-term, as it invariably leads to the chaos that is currently United Airlines.</font>
I dare say that most COers would NOT support such CS moves over the long-term, as it invariably leads to the chaos that is currently United Airlines.</font>
Steve
[This message has been edited by sllevin (edited 10-19-2003).]
#33
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,579
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by venk:
http://www.airlinequality.com/Product/seats_global.htm
No major airline of the world has it worse than CO in 2-class or more planes. Amongst the US airlines, only NWA has similar pitch to CO. That would certainly entitle it to be called the industry-trailing coach.
You are welcome.</font>
http://www.airlinequality.com/Product/seats_global.htm
No major airline of the world has it worse than CO in 2-class or more planes. Amongst the US airlines, only NWA has similar pitch to CO. That would certainly entitle it to be called the industry-trailing coach.
You are welcome.</font>
The link you provided is for *international* flights. That's not the topic at hand, and certainly a smaller proportion of total asms for any of the airlines in question.
I asked for facts, but I guess we're still pimpin' AA, no?
Saying "No major airline of the world has it worse than CO in 2-class or more planes" is simply not based in fact, as your "data" is only for international flights.
Jeez.
#34
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Once Seattle...then DC....now CDG.
Posts: 4,059
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by avek00:
Over the past six weeks, I have had extensive contact with UA in regards to a *A Asia award ticket for next year. So far, I have received the following treatment from UA:
1. I was booked into revenue C on IAD-LAX in order to fix a routing error;
2. A $75 change fee was waived when I changed from AC to SQ for no good reason whatsoever; and
3. A UA supe. contacted UA's SIN office to see if the could get SQ to release a seat on the nonstop SIN-LAX flight (I got booked onto the flight the next day, though I don't know if it was a direct result of the call...)
Does all of this make sense? I am just a base UA member (with only 1 segment flown YTD, albeit at a Y fare), and Chairman of the Most Wonderful Continental Airlines Highly Valuable OnePass Program Security and Ideological Purity Bureau to boot, so I'm not exactly a UA fan or ally. With agents and supervisors that so flagrantly disregard the rules (for the average Joe, let alone more frequent travelers), it is no wonder that United is mired in a Chapter 11 case that it can't seem to emerge from save with divine (or governmental) intervention. The inmates really do run the asylum at United, and sadly it appears that the only way to regain control might be to burn the place down for good...
</font>
Over the past six weeks, I have had extensive contact with UA in regards to a *A Asia award ticket for next year. So far, I have received the following treatment from UA:
1. I was booked into revenue C on IAD-LAX in order to fix a routing error;
2. A $75 change fee was waived when I changed from AC to SQ for no good reason whatsoever; and
3. A UA supe. contacted UA's SIN office to see if the could get SQ to release a seat on the nonstop SIN-LAX flight (I got booked onto the flight the next day, though I don't know if it was a direct result of the call...)
Does all of this make sense? I am just a base UA member (with only 1 segment flown YTD, albeit at a Y fare), and Chairman of the Most Wonderful Continental Airlines Highly Valuable OnePass Program Security and Ideological Purity Bureau to boot, so I'm not exactly a UA fan or ally. With agents and supervisors that so flagrantly disregard the rules (for the average Joe, let alone more frequent travelers), it is no wonder that United is mired in a Chapter 11 case that it can't seem to emerge from save with divine (or governmental) intervention. The inmates really do run the asylum at United, and sadly it appears that the only way to regain control might be to burn the place down for good...
</font>
#35
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: AUS
Programs: DL Diamond, DL MM
Posts: 578
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by venk:
I am not sure by COer if you mean CO employees or CO people on the board here. If the latter, I will bite... which CO traveler (not just an investor!) here believes UA did something bad here that they would personally fault them for....
Anyone?</font>
I am not sure by COer if you mean CO employees or CO people on the board here. If the latter, I will bite... which CO traveler (not just an investor!) here believes UA did something bad here that they would personally fault them for....
Anyone?</font>
I am not saying to give away freebies, but in the example that was cited, I think UA went above and beyond for Avek. In his trying to slam them, he has increased my opinion of UA. Even if UA loses some small revenue from the favor they did, most people would recognize the effort put forth, and would reward UA with additional business in the future.
Who knows, if NW follows CO, I may head UA's way because of Avek's advertising.....
K
#36
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2003
Location: AA Plat / UA NOTHING / Alaska 75K / Hyatt Diamond / SPG LT Plat / Marriott Gold / Priority Club Plat / Hertz Pres
Posts: 24,706
At UA they go out of their way to give the customers what they want??!!! I haven't flown UA for a year or two but with my Gold Elite at CO in hand for the year, avek00 you have convinced me to give them a try. I just booked a Y fare on them instead for the airline that gives us one GLORIOUS day after another.
#37
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,748
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by JeremyZ:
Saying "No major airline of the world has it worse than CO in 2-class or more planes" is simply not based in fact, as your "data" is only for international flights.</font>
Saying "No major airline of the world has it worse than CO in 2-class or more planes" is simply not based in fact, as your "data" is only for international flights.</font>
www.seatguru.com
and check for each plane.
BTW, why did you think the original statement was only for domestic?
#38
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Commuting around the mid-atlantic and rust-belt on any number of RJs
Programs: TSA Random Selectee Platinum, * Gold, SPG/HH/MR mid-tier, and a tiny bag of pretzels.
Posts: 9,255
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by JeremyZ:
Okay . . . please point to data related to "lack of room in CO's coach product (versus the other cartel majors)"
I concede that UA and AA have more room. Tell me how pitch or width compare to US, NW and DL. You've used the term "industry-trailing" coach - why? </font>
Okay . . . please point to data related to "lack of room in CO's coach product (versus the other cartel majors)"
I concede that UA and AA have more room. Tell me how pitch or width compare to US, NW and DL. You've used the term "industry-trailing" coach - why? </font>
All of the CO fleet is listed as 31 or 32 inches of pitch in coach. Most of the domestic narrowbodies with the exception of the 753 seem to be listed as 31 inches.
All of AA's fleet is at 33-35 inches, with the exception of one of the 762 variants, listed at 32-34 inches.
US' Airbus fleet is 32 inches, with the exception of the 330, which is 33-35. The US boeing fleet is 31 inches.
UA's pitch varies, from 31 on some planes, to 36 in E+. Generally, the E+ seats carry 33-36 inches of pitch. I have status with UA, thus I sit in E+ seats.
How would you characterize the difference?
Again, for those who missed it--there is published data to suggest that CO's pitch is horrid in comparison with their competition, but I've yet to see anything about the service levels on United or American (except the off color ramblings of those with an agenda to troll).
------------------
Don't feed the trolls.
#39
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,579
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by ClueByFour:
[snip]
Again, for those who missed it--there is published data to suggest that CO's pitch is horrid in comparison with their competition, but I've yet to see anything about the service levels on United or American (except the off color ramblings of those with an agenda to troll).
</font>
[snip]
Again, for those who missed it--there is published data to suggest that CO's pitch is horrid in comparison with their competition, but I've yet to see anything about the service levels on United or American (except the off color ramblings of those with an agenda to troll).
</font>
There is no appreciable coach pitch difference between the fleets of NW, CO and DL, let alone any difference a right-thinking person would describe as "horrid." US also operates 42% of its aircraft at a 31" coach pitch - the nine A330s are the only aircraft with an economy pitch in excess of 32". UA operates the *vast* majority of its aircraft with a 31" pitch outside of economy plus.
AA is really the only "competition" that offers more than an inch additional space than CO/DL/NW throughout the cabin, throughout the fleet.
An inch.
CB4, consider yourself (once again) debunked.
#40
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: TPA
Programs: DL Plat, AA Plat Pro 2MM, HH Diamond, WoH Globalist, Bonvoy Gold
Posts: 2,207
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by JeremyZ:
There is no appreciable coach pitch difference between the fleets of NW, CO and DL, let alone any difference a right-thinking person would describe as "horrid." US also operates 42% of its aircraft at a 31" coach pitch - the nine A330s are the only aircraft with an economy pitch in excess of 32". UA operates the *vast* majority of its aircraft with a 31" pitch outside of economy plus.
AA is really the only "competition" that offers more than an inch additional space than CO/DL/NW throughout the cabin, throughout the fleet.
An inch.</font>
There is no appreciable coach pitch difference between the fleets of NW, CO and DL, let alone any difference a right-thinking person would describe as "horrid." US also operates 42% of its aircraft at a 31" coach pitch - the nine A330s are the only aircraft with an economy pitch in excess of 32". UA operates the *vast* majority of its aircraft with a 31" pitch outside of economy plus.
AA is really the only "competition" that offers more than an inch additional space than CO/DL/NW throughout the cabin, throughout the fleet.
An inch.</font>
I am 6'5" and even an inch makes a difference. With a 31" pitch, my knees are already pressed against the seat in front of me. With 32", it's tight but I can move my legs (carefully) without hitting the seatback. Even WN has a 32" pitch!
I guess the bruises on my knees are another enhancement.
#41
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Sunny SYDNEY!
Programs: UA Million Miler. (1.9M) Virgin Platinum. HH Diamond + SPG Gold
Posts: 32,330
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by avek00:
Over the past six weeks, I have had extensive contact with UA in regards to a *A Asia award ticket for next year. So far, I have received the following treatment from UA:
1. I was booked into revenue C on IAD-LAX in order to fix a routing error;
2. A $75 change fee was waived when I changed from AC to SQ for no good reason whatsoever; and
3. A UA supe. contacted UA's SIN office to see if the could get SQ to release a seat on the nonstop SIN-LAX flight (I got booked onto the flight the next day, though I don't know if it was a direct result of the call...)
Does all of this make sense? I am just a base UA member (with only 1 segment flown YTD, albeit at a Y fare), and Chairman of the Most Wonderful Continental Airlines Highly Valuable OnePass Program Security and Ideological Purity Bureau to boot, so I'm not exactly a UA fan or ally. With agents and supervisors that so flagrantly disregard the rules (for the average Joe, let alone more frequent travelers), it is no wonder that United is mired in a Chapter 11 case that it can't seem to emerge from save with divine (or governmental) intervention. The inmates really do run the asylum at United, and sadly it appears that the only way to regain control might be to burn the place down for good...
</font>
Over the past six weeks, I have had extensive contact with UA in regards to a *A Asia award ticket for next year. So far, I have received the following treatment from UA:
1. I was booked into revenue C on IAD-LAX in order to fix a routing error;
2. A $75 change fee was waived when I changed from AC to SQ for no good reason whatsoever; and
3. A UA supe. contacted UA's SIN office to see if the could get SQ to release a seat on the nonstop SIN-LAX flight (I got booked onto the flight the next day, though I don't know if it was a direct result of the call...)
Does all of this make sense? I am just a base UA member (with only 1 segment flown YTD, albeit at a Y fare), and Chairman of the Most Wonderful Continental Airlines Highly Valuable OnePass Program Security and Ideological Purity Bureau to boot, so I'm not exactly a UA fan or ally. With agents and supervisors that so flagrantly disregard the rules (for the average Joe, let alone more frequent travelers), it is no wonder that United is mired in a Chapter 11 case that it can't seem to emerge from save with divine (or governmental) intervention. The inmates really do run the asylum at United, and sadly it appears that the only way to regain control might be to burn the place down for good...
</font>
Truth is he wanted to route totally illegally by backtracking on a Star Alliance award that requires "most direct routing". Everyone past third grade that can read can see that is what the award involved, but not avek00, who wanted to route from ATL backtracking to east coast (IAD and JFK) and THEN flying west to Asia. ATL-SIN westwards is the legal routing.
By his own admission elsewhere he contacted EIGHTEEN United staffers whining and blubbering and haranguing to get what HE wanted done. Plus any other staffers he contacted past that point in August.
It appears United simply gave up on him as their time wanted dealing with his obvious nuisance calls had already cost them $100s in wages, for an award that was on a partner carrier anyway, (for which they pay real money) using miles he transferred over from CO via Amtrak anyway as I understand it.
Has ANYONE here ever phoned an airline EIGHTEEN times over one booking?
(So much for the CO cheerleader - He knows a biz It'l award on CO is a pipe dream.)
So AFTER united bow in to EIGHTEEN+ calls to staffers driving them nuts he chooses to serve this up as an example of what a crummy airline United is.
Some folks have absolutely no gratitude.
Someone gets BETTER customer service than anyone could ever DREAM of from any airline you are a proud SILVER elite member of, and yet bag them and their airline when they come good.
But wait - isn't the very same person who started a thread about this titled"
"A job well done by United"
Aren't you the SAME person avek00 who allegedly typed this to "The inmates who run the asylum at United" about this same incident?:
"Kudos to the UA folks involved in making lemonade out of my lemon reservation. If you're reading this, know that my complimentary letter to UAWHQ is on the way."
I always get it mixed up - does one spell hypocrite with a 'y' or an 'i'?
ANY airline would go broke if all "customers" took 18 calls to acheive something they know darn well is ILLEGAL right from the get-go. Period.
For anyone with the time or inclination, this is the REAL thread with the FACTS, that like most of Avek00s United threads, got locked down. And 4 x FT'ers got timed out over:
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/Forum50/HTML/021715.html
------------------
Don't forget the FT Party In Paradise 'PiP' Hana Hou - in HNL Oct 25-27
#42
In Memoriam
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Southern California
Programs: Hertz 5 star, Priceline Hotel bidder. AA PLT, 1MM.
Posts: 2,910
I did a LH FC award to the DUS DO this past July. It took one phone call to make booking, one trip to airport to ticket, and one phone call to change outbound date. (I could have the ticket mailed but since I was ticketing another ticket anyway, I chose to ticket at the airport)
It was my first Star Alliance FC award. Very simple process.
Edited to correct mistake.
[This message has been edited by chemist661 (edited 10-20-2003).]
It was my first Star Alliance FC award. Very simple process.
Edited to correct mistake.
[This message has been edited by chemist661 (edited 10-20-2003).]
#43
Suspended
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Promoted to Chairman of the Most Wonderful Continental Airlines Highly Valuable OnePass Program Security and Ideological Purity Bureau
Posts: 4,129
Ozstamps:
Since you have elected to continue to grossly distort the facts, as well as try to label me a liar "because YOU say so", I will not dignify your preceding remarks with a detailed response.
------------------
Has YOUR airline won an award lately?
Since you have elected to continue to grossly distort the facts, as well as try to label me a liar "because YOU say so", I will not dignify your preceding remarks with a detailed response.
------------------
Has YOUR airline won an award lately?
#44
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 834
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by ozstamps:
So AFTER united bow in to EIGHTEEN+ calls to staffers driving them nuts </font>
So AFTER united bow in to EIGHTEEN+ calls to staffers driving them nuts </font>
#45
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 834
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by avek00:
Ozstamps:
Since you have elected to continue to grossly distort the facts, as well as try to label me a liar "because YOU say so", I will not dignify your preceding remarks with a detailed response.
</font>
Ozstamps:
Since you have elected to continue to grossly distort the facts, as well as try to label me a liar "because YOU say so", I will not dignify your preceding remarks with a detailed response.
</font>
Avek, please go back away.