Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Discontinued Programs/Partners > Continental OnePass (Pre-Merger)
Reload this Page >

CO 1644 pit-iah no direct tv-fa's couldn't care!

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

CO 1644 pit-iah no direct tv-fa's couldn't care!

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 30, 2011, 3:35 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Programs: HH Silver, MR Plat Prem & LT Plat, Hyatt Plat,SPG Plat, Hertz PC, National EE, UA 1K
Posts: 3,405
CO 1644 pit-iah no direct tv-fa's couldn't care!

Sitting in PAID F on 1644-fa just announced upon entering "direct tv is broken and we will not be giving you anything for free in place of it, so don't ask!"


I am so tired of IFE NOT working on co planes. Wonder if this will be a free 25 miles???


And all of you co apologists-I booked co paid f over us paid f DUE TO IFE!!!!!!!!
PhillyPhlyer40 is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2011, 3:57 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: STL
Programs: UA Platinum, AA Platinum Pro, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 1,429
I guess I am one of the few people who really find it absurd that people make it a point to indicate it was paid F as if somehow that makes the complaint more worthy.

Whether you were in Y or F, whether it was on an award or you paid for it, the fact is you expected an amenity that wasn't offered and didn't recieve it. You could make the same justification that you paid a $10 premium to fly CO vs US for that matter.

Bottom line, it sucks and I think more often than not we've all got on a plane prepared for one thing and something else comes up. It would be beneficial that a gate agent would have announced they swapped planes at the last minute and now I'm on a plane without power; would have allowed me to charge up my phone or ipod.

So is it sympathy, is it a rant, or is it waiting for someone to chime in and say "read a book"? This isn't to single you out, it's just what would you expect the F/A's to do? I was on a EWRSAN flight where the woman next to me made it a point to complain to the F/A everytime he came by how it awful it was the TV's didnt get installed. Did she expect that by rant 25 something would change?
qukslvr619 is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2011, 4:08 pm
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
Originally Posted by qukslvr619
This isn't to single you out, it's just what would you expect the F/A's to do?
I would expect the FA's to be polite, at a minimum. The part about not giving you something so don't ask is pretty rude, IMO.

I understand that the FAs have a tough job being in the front line, especially when there is a service failure such as this (compounded moreso by a rigid culture at CO that doesn't provide anything for impacted customers).
channa is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2011, 4:16 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: STL
Programs: UA Platinum, AA Platinum Pro, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 1,429
Yes, I agree that the F/A's could deliver a more scripted line. Perhaps a "Ladies and Gentleman due to techincal difficulties we are not able to offer our direct TV service, and while we are not able to offer any compensation, you will be satisfied to know that are flying with the most professional men and women in the industry" would be better?

Not defending either side here. I have my own gripes today....like why my UA reservation doesn't show upgrade status at all online but the res agents swear I'm on a list.
qukslvr619 is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2011, 4:42 pm
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
Originally Posted by qukslvr619
Yes, I agree that the F/A's could deliver a more scripted line. Perhaps a "Ladies and Gentleman due to techincal difficulties we are not able to offer our direct TV service, and while we are not able to offer any compensation, you will be satisfied to know that are flying with the most professional men and women in the industry" would be better?
While the "most professional" rhetoric has been gone for about a year now, I agree that a canned apology would at least be more polite than what the FA's said on this one.
channa is offline  
Old Aug 31, 2011, 10:46 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Between EWR & PHL
Programs: UA MileagePlus dirt (former hard-way Silver); AS Mileage Plan MVP; Hilton Honors Silver
Posts: 1,586
Originally Posted by PhillyPhlyer40
Sitting in PAID F on 1644-fa just announced upon entering "direct tv is broken and we will not be giving you anything for free in place of it, so don't ask!"


I am so tired of IFE NOT working on co planes. Wonder if this will be a free 25 miles???


And all of you co apologists-I booked co paid f over us paid f DUE TO IFE!!!!!!!!
Two thoughts:

1) You really paid for F on CO simply for DTV? HAHAHAHAHA. You do realize it's only $7 in Y, right? Regardless of how you feel about paying for IFE, I have to imagine a Y seat + $7 is less than the F seat you paid for. Hell, a Y seat + the cost of an iPad is probably still less than paid F on that route.

2) Boy, I'd hate to see how you'd have reacted if you ended up on a 737 with the temporary (non-Kioto) seats and no IFE at all...
Critic is offline  
Old Aug 31, 2011, 11:56 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Programs: UA 1K, Marriott Gold, SPG Gold
Posts: 1,498
Originally Posted by Critic
Two thoughts:

1) You really paid for F on CO simply for DTV? HAHAHAHAHA. You do realize it's only $7 in Y, right? Regardless of how you feel about paying for IFE, I have to imagine a Y seat + $7 is less than the F seat you paid for. Hell, a Y seat + the cost of an iPad is probably still less than paid F on that route.
The OP's point is that he was booking paid F no matter what, but chose CO over US specifically for the IFE. If CO would like to use its IFE as a means of driving marginal revenue, which I would assume is true or else it wouldn't have installed it, it's pretty reasonable to expect working Directv in F.
iceman77_7 is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2011, 5:11 am
  #8  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Programs: HH Silver, MR Plat Prem & LT Plat, Hyatt Plat,SPG Plat, Hertz PC, National EE, UA 1K
Posts: 3,405
Originally Posted by Critic
Two thoughts:

1) You really paid for F on CO simply for DTV? HAHAHAHAHA.

No, I was buying the f flight. 2 choices. US or CO. BOTH the same price. As this was a last minute booking, I went to the PDA site. On it, it stated direct tv.

Well, that didn't happen. CO wants to sell dtv as a feature-and they should assure it works.


As a note it had a piece of tape over the on/off controls that said inop. Why not just fix it???
PhillyPhlyer40 is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2011, 5:28 am
  #9  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ORD / DUB / LHR
Programs: UA 1K MM; BA Silver; Marriott Plat
Posts: 8,243
Originally Posted by PhillyPhlyer40
As a note it had a piece of tape over the on/off controls that said inop. Why not just fix it???
Because it doesn't make any sort of good business sense to pull the aircraft out of service in the middle of the day to fix non-safety-related items like this. Most likely it was fixed that night if/when the aircraft arrived in a CO hub for the night, or the following night if it was ending the day at another airport.

It's not like these things are left flying around the network for weeks on end without being fixed.

And before I get accused by some posters of sympathising with CO I agree that the FA could have announced this in a more professional way.
star_world is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2011, 6:31 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 205
Originally Posted by PhillyPhlyer40
Well, that didn't happen. CO wants to sell dtv as a feature-and they should assure it works.


As a note it had a piece of tape over the on/off controls that said inop. Why not just fix it???
So ground the airplane and cancel the flight is your solution? Great idea in a business with razor margins! I've been on both JB and Virgin flights where the satellite was garbage and thus no service the entire time. It happens.
cv11nyc is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2011, 11:43 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: PHX and TUS
Programs: UA 1K SPG Plat HHonors Diamond
Posts: 253
I've had three flights from EWR without IFE and it was the whole plane not just F. Sent in emails for all three about checking in on it. Two of the three I was comped 2k miles each time for the inconvience.
qoodoo is offline  
Old Sep 1, 2011, 11:49 pm
  #12  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
Originally Posted by qoodoo
I've had three flights from EWR without IFE and it was the whole plane not just F. Sent in emails for all three about checking in on it. Two of the three I was comped 2k miles each time for the inconvience.
And people complain about FF programs being devalued. This is part of the reason why.
Often1 is offline  
Old Sep 2, 2011, 12:16 am
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Portland
Posts: 11,570
Originally Posted by Often1
And people complain about FF programs being devalued. This is part of the reason why.
Broken equipment is the reason why FF programs are devalued?
rjque is offline  
Old Sep 2, 2011, 6:41 am
  #14  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ORD / DUB / LHR
Programs: UA 1K MM; BA Silver; Marriott Plat
Posts: 8,243
Originally Posted by rjque
Broken equipment is the reason why FF programs are devalued?
No, giving miles out like candy for nonsense is why FF programs are devalued.
star_world is offline  
Old Sep 2, 2011, 6:44 am
  #15  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
Originally Posted by star_world
No, giving miles out like candy for nonsense is why FF programs are devalued.
CS miles are a pittance compared to the credit card miles generated.
channa is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.