Downgraded from PAID F to Y, while elites in Y were upgraded to F
#91
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW
Programs: UA Pleb, HH Gold, PWP General Secretary
Posts: 23,199
That's not quite true. CO has an algorithm to prioritize the downgrade in case of a reduction in cabin size. Essentially a reverse-EUA. So basically the lowest level elites on the lowest fare classes will get downgraded, but will also receive the standard downgrade compensation.
It's been some time since they did it based on whether or not your seat assignment still existed.
It's been some time since they did it based on whether or not your seat assignment still existed.
#92
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Programs: DL SM Plat, B6 TrueBlue, UA MP, AAdvantage
Posts: 10,008
That's not quite true. CO has an algorithm to prioritize the downgrade in case of a reduction in cabin size. Essentially a reverse-EUA. So basically the lowest level elites on the lowest fare classes will get downgraded, but will also receive the standard downgrade compensation.
It's been some time since they did it based on whether or not your seat assignment still existed.
It's been some time since they did it based on whether or not your seat assignment still existed.
In that case, the passengers who paid for coach sit in FC and the ones who paid for FC (albeit on another flight) sit in Y...
#93
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 27,231
Does any airline do that??? That opens a whole other can of worms. Of course the "solution" is to not fill the last [2] FC seats until the gate; CO seems to often fill the FC cabin with upgrades at T-24. Perhaps they know they usually have enough no-shows/misconnects to accommodate those displaced pax. After all, I don't recall hearing all that many examples here of FC pax being downgraded when they need to be re-accommodated. Current thread notwithstanding, of course.
#94
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: ATL/TLV/SDF
Programs: AA EXP, UA LT Ag, Marriott LT Ti, Hyatt Glob, Avis PC, Busted-Knuckles Club Grand Poobah.
Posts: 2,590
Happened again to me yesterday. Confirmed in F/BF w/SWU BOS-IAH-EZE. Get to the airport, no seat. Downgauge from 737-8 to 737-7 so a row of F seats went away. Fortunately someone already up there took a bump back to Y for me. Unsure how that works but I'm sure s/he was compensated.
#95
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
All of this points to why carriers should hold UG's to the gate. If, after the paying customers are acommodated in F, there remain seats, they should then be allocated however the carrier wants its UG system to work (presuming that the freebie UG system is a good idea in the first place).
#96
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Programs: DL SM Plat, B6 TrueBlue, UA MP, AAdvantage
Posts: 10,008
All of this points to why carriers should hold UG's to the gate. If, after the paying customers are acommodated in F, there remain seats, they should then be allocated however the carrier wants its UG system to work (presuming that the freebie UG system is a good idea in the first place).
Obviously, airlines would prefer to sell full F before full Y, but the reality is that full Y sells more readily than full F, because it is cheaper.
So by freeing up seats in the economy section beginning at about five days to go, the carriers have more Y inventory available for their highest-yield economy passengers.
This is one of the reasons that upgrades don't simply clear at the gate.
#97
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
The upgrade system was created not just to reward loyalty (which, of course, is a big part of it), but also to free up seats in the economy cabin for last-minute, high-yield passengers paying either full Y or close to it.
Obviously, airlines would prefer to sell full F before full Y, but the reality is that full Y sells more readily than full F, because it is cheaper.
So by freeing up seats in the economy section beginning at about five days to go, the carriers have more Y inventory available for their highest-yield economy passengers.
This is one of the reasons that upgrades don't simply clear at the gate.
Obviously, airlines would prefer to sell full F before full Y, but the reality is that full Y sells more readily than full F, because it is cheaper.
So by freeing up seats in the economy section beginning at about five days to go, the carriers have more Y inventory available for their highest-yield economy passengers.
This is one of the reasons that upgrades don't simply clear at the gate.
#98
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Programs: DL SM Plat, B6 TrueBlue, UA MP, AAdvantage
Posts: 10,008
F is rarely cheaper, that's why people are more likely to buy Y than F.
So when upgrades were created, one of the objectives was to free up Y inventory, to put that passenger (a highly-loyal customer) into F as a perk, but also to free up a Y seat (where that elite had been been sitting before he/she was upgraded) so that there would now be additional Y inventory available.
Since passengers are indeed more likely to buy Y than F (even expensive high-yield Y), the upgrade not only rewards the elite, but it opens up an additional revenue source (the elite's former Y seat).
That's one reason why upgrades are processed beginning at five days to go before travel, and not at the gate, to give last-minute bookings to Y a chance to accrue additional revenue...
#99
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: BOS
Programs: UA 1K/1MM, DL PM/1MM, Marriott Amb/LT Titanium, HHonors Diamond, Priority Club Platinum, Hyatt Disc
Posts: 522
I.E. once you are in F you stay in F unless there is an aircraft change and you happen to be in that row that goes away. The agent can not downgrade an upgrader in favor of a revenue passenger. Yes, that sounds stupid but it protects all passengers. An agent can't simply move people into and of FC at will and it decreases the appearance of Shena.
I wonder which set of rules will be used going forward.
#100
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: IAD
Programs: UA 1K, Marriott Rewards - LTPP
Posts: 4,240
This has not been my experience on UA when they did an A320/A319 swap. I was in Row 2, not Row 3 so my seat still existed on the A319. I was pad at the gate to be downgraded and then I saw that there was one seat left in F and one person (not me), on the upgrade list. I inquired about it and was told that that seat was for paid F and there was a paid F on the upgrade list. So, the GA took my F seat away from me (1K upgraded via CR1) and pissed me off and gave it to a paid F who was hoping for an F seat but had no reason to be assured of it.
I wonder which set of rules will be used going forward.
I wonder which set of rules will be used going forward.
#101
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 67,133
This has not been my experience on UA when they did an A320/A319 swap. I was in Row 2, not Row 3 so my seat still existed on the A319. I was pad at the gate to be downgraded and then I saw that there was one seat left in F and one person (not me), on the upgrade list. I inquired about it and was told that that seat was for paid F and there was a paid F on the upgrade list. So, the GA took my F seat away from me (1K upgraded via CR1) and pissed me off and gave it to a paid F who was hoping for an F seat but had no reason to be assured of it.
I wonder which set of rules will be used going forward.
I wonder which set of rules will be used going forward.
UA does typically downgrade upgraders as needed due to equipment swaps, but typically will not downgrade just to let a paid F pax from another flight stand by onto the flight.
#102
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: BOS
Programs: UA 1K/1MM, DL PM/1MM, Marriott Amb/LT Titanium, HHonors Diamond, Priority Club Platinum, Hyatt Disc
Posts: 522
Did the GA mean the paid F pax was on the standby list? Or had the paid F pax done a confirmed change for Y and been put on the waitlist for F (probably with a priority of FFCC, ahead of the UGDG "normal" upgraders)?
UA does typically downgrade upgraders as needed due to equipment swaps, but typically will not downgrade just to let a paid F pax from another flight stand by onto the flight.
UA does typically downgrade upgraders as needed due to equipment swaps, but typically will not downgrade just to let a paid F pax from another flight stand by onto the flight.
This was an aircraft change so maybe the GA took the opportunity to swap my seat for a paid F passenger who was on the upgrade list. It's also possible that everyone else was already paid F...
#103
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Programs: UA 1K, AA Lifetime Platinum, DL Platinum, Honors Diamond, Bonvoy Titanium, Hertz Platinum
Posts: 7,969
That's not the only reasons. Many if not most corporate travel policies prohibit the purchase of F fares for domestic travel. It doesn't matter if F is only a little bit more than Y, the same as Y, or in some cases cheaper than Y - many business travelers simply cannot purchase an F ticket.
#104
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Programs: DL SM Plat, B6 TrueBlue, UA MP, AAdvantage
Posts: 10,008
That's not the only reasons. Many if not most corporate travel policies prohibit the purchase of F fares for domestic travel. It doesn't matter if F is only a little bit more than Y, the same as Y, or in some cases cheaper than Y - many business travelers simply cannot purchase an F ticket.
The bottom line, is that the upgrade system was created not only to reward elites, but also to increase last-minute Y inventory (by having the elites upgrade out of Y into F), which traditionally has been among the highest yield in the airline industry.