FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Continental OnePass (Pre-Merger) (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/continental-onepass-pre-merger-488/)
-   -   Does Continental hate Inter-continental babies? (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/continental-onepass-pre-merger/1199820-does-continental-hate-inter-continental-babies.html)

encierro98 Mar 31, 2011 2:20 pm


Originally Posted by pbuntrock (Post 16136566)
I couldn't disagree with you more. This is is not about that thing happen, of course they do. But rather the thing that happen to you and are caused by you are your responsibility. The things that I cause are my responsibility. Why are your problems and actions my responsibility? And very often these are not "small inconveniences". And yes, I have three children and have traveled with them since they were enfants; mant internationl flight.

Babies cry, it is their nature, not a fact of responsibility. Sure there are extreme cases where the parents don't do anything about it, but being a parent sometimes these things happen and you can't control it. Is the solution to stay at home and not in public, until the kid is out of this stage. A small inconvenience it is. You can be driving and someone comes smashing into you, that is an big inconvenience. You can be sitting in Japan and a tsunami comes, that is a big inconvenience. I would think catching someone else’s flu is more of inconvenience than a kid that has an occasional cry on the plane. Again something out of your control, and due to someone else.

Wilco_FT Apr 1, 2011 3:00 am


Originally Posted by dbf100 (Post 16133012)
Very interesting about LH vs CO FA treatment of kids on intl flights. LH is an option for us, too. There are definitely some carriers more attuned to families.

Is your impression based on a large sample size?

Large is relative. I began flying back and forth between Europe and North America on a regular basis late 2010. Another family I know did the same. We have both tried CO and LH multiple times and have had the same experiences.

CO has not loaded the special meals for my children twice, despite me trying to verify multiple times before the flight that it was in my reservation. Continental Flight Attendant literally made my wife cry because she was doing everything she could to settle my child and the FA was downright rude to her while doing so. LH, on the other hand, goes out of their way by providing toys to the children, asking if we would prefer to move to a different seat where they believe it will be easier for us to make our children comfortable, etc. My friends just returned to Europe and said that the LH flight attendant brought some gummi bears to help settle their near 4 year old child. It worked and made both the mom and everyone around much happier, not to mention the child.

So again -- sample size is relative. My observation is that it is consistent enough, I will likely choose LH over CO when priced similarly and the times are convenient. It is not a strong enough opinion that I would pay more or fly at a less convenient time most likely.

AAExPlat Apr 1, 2011 10:16 am


Originally Posted by pbuntrock (Post 16136402)
These threads show up on FlyerTalk all the time, they drive me completely insane. My point of view:

- Your enfant may be special to you
- Your little Johnny with ADD may be special to you
- Your Grandmother with Alzheimer’s my be special to you
- Your 500 lbs body may be special to you
- Your 15 preflight cocktails may be special to you
- Your elite status may be special to you

None of these are special to me. All I want is the seat I paid for. And for no one seated next to be to make my flight miserable.

We have become a society were because your “special” you get to make me miserable. Fire away, I can take it.

I hope for your sake that:

- you never get old
- never have children
- never become ill

otherwise, you'll find yourself quickly among all the folks you are complaining about being allowed on an airplane.

AAExPlat Apr 1, 2011 10:18 am


Originally Posted by pbuntrock (Post 16136566)
...And yes, I have three children and have traveled with them since they were enfants; mant internationl flight.

Ah. Now I get it. When you had small children, you had no problem taking them on a flight, but now that they are older, you'd like for others not to take their kids on flights. Makes perfect sense.:rolleyes:

AAExPlat Apr 1, 2011 10:24 am


Originally Posted by jgcii (Post 16134676)
You are unbelievably wrong. No one has a right to fly. Period.

Correct. Flying itself isn't a right. But if an airline sells tickets and purchasers are allowed to buy tickets for children, then it is my right to take the kids on the plane when I have paid for their seats. Am I missing something?


Originally Posted by jgcii (Post 16134676)
From a purely business point of view I suggest there is enough people who travel for a living that a case can be made for no leisure travellers on board (read no kids). There would likely be a hefty premium for that service and admittedly it would be difficult to implement.

By all means, open up said airline and let us know how how business is on your airline. I suggest a catchy name for the airline like "intolerair" or discriminair".:D


Originally Posted by jgcii (Post 16134676)
I have 2 young boys and I know my kids. Taking them together on a plane is a good way to upset a whole lot of other folks. Seperately they are fine. But as noted by another poster the travel is actually harder on them - discomfort, loss of control, and the all-mighty BOREDOM. So the best answer is not to fly them - thus Hawaii has been off the radar, as well as Europe, etc...

Great. You know your kids, but you don't know mine. I took them to Thailand this year, and they did fabulously. Everyone commented on how well they did both ways. That's because they are used to flying and because my wife and I are ultra-prepared for each trip...anticipating every need. So in the end, you make your choice, I make mine. If I had your kids, maybe I wouldn't set foot o a plane either. But with mine, no issues.


Originally Posted by jgcii (Post 16134676)
The OP notes that family visits must be paid - I suggest that fa,ily can come to visit. There myriad ways in which infants can be accomodated - airplanes are just one solution and absolutely NOT a right.

Right. So in other words...because your family is close and it's not a need you have, others should be gracious and just have an entire extended family come visit you so you don't have to put your kids on a plane. Makes sense. And we haven't even addressed the financial aspect of your absurd suggestion.

debbieict1 Apr 1, 2011 11:19 am

Your not handicapped or special when you travel with small kids....they are not exempt from the seatbelt rule.....please use headsets while your child watches TellaTubbies, do not allow your child to kick the seat in front and the aisles need to remail clear, it's not romper room or your own private day care.....oh and the Flight Attendants are not there as your baby sitter or personal servant...it's a public airline not a private charter

encierro98 Apr 1, 2011 12:28 pm


Originally Posted by debbieict1 (Post 16142168)
Your not handicapped or special when you travel with small kids....they are not exempt from the seatbelt rule.....please use headsets while your child watches TellaTubbies, do not allow your child to kick the seat in front and the aisles need to remail clear, it's not romper room or your own private day care.....oh and the Flight Attendants are not there as your baby sitter or personal servant...it's a public airline not a private charter

All true (except technically kids are exempt from seat belt rule on some airlines) but I don't think anybody on either side of this argument is condoning your actions you listed.

infomark Apr 1, 2011 2:51 pm

I've been following this thread so thought I would share this Gem with you all.

Remember Folks its April 1st

http://money.msn.com/saving-money-ti...8-12da8aeda32e

RYANAIR TO INTRODUCE ‘CHILD FREE’ FLIGHTS

Ryanair, the world’s favourite airlines, today announced that it will introduce ‘Child Free’ flights from October (winter schedule) after a Europe-wide survey of 1,000 passengers showed that half would pay higher fares to avoid other people’s children. The survey showed that a third of passengers (36%) have had flights ‘ruined’ by other people’s noisy kids with one in five passengers (18%) urging Ryanair to restrict the number of children on flights.

While the survey found that passengers would prefer to avoid other people’s children, it placed ‘blame’ firmly with parents with top gripes being:

50% Parents who expect ‘special treatment’ because they have children.
25% Parents who allow children to annoy those in seats behind.
15% Parents who board late and expect others to accommodate them.
10% Parents who allow children to run in the aisles or kick seats.

mnmag Apr 1, 2011 7:56 pm

I think this thread now belongs in 'OMNI'!:rolleyes:


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:29 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.