London Heathrow Move Imminent?
It has been rumoured ever since CO joined Star Alliance that they are moving from Terminal 4 to Terminal 1. The imminent move apparently explains why BF passengers can still use the Sky Team Lounge - because they know it's only a temporary arrangement.
The latest rumour is that CO will change terminal somewhere around Easter 2010, although one guy at Heathrow who is, allegedly, "in the know" was adamant that March 25th will be the date. I can't see anything on CO's web-site and if I look at my employer's Departure Control System for flights next summer, all of CO's departures show Terminal 4. Are there any Continental insiders out there who know what is happening please? |
Makes eminent sense as CO is now the fish out of water @ T4 / Skyteam central.
|
There are two theories on the potential for the move. One is that it is imminent. The other is that it will happen several years down the line after the reconstruction of T2. There hasn't been anything "official" stated either way.
I wouldn't read too much into the use of the ST lounge. It is quite common for carriers to contract for lounge services when in the same terminal, just like they can contract for other ground handling functions. CO pays for the passengers who use the lounge so SkyTeam probably doesn't mind all that much. |
Originally Posted by BearX220
(Post 12912069)
Makes eminent sense as CO is now the fish out of water @ T4 / Skyteam central.
One thing to bear in mind is that the *A carriers are already scattered across two terminals, so moving CO to T1 or T3 will only help for some *A connections. Connecting between T1 and T3 still involves a bus connection, just like T4 to T1/T3, though the MCT rises from 75 minutes to 90. From a terminal perspective, I'm not sure moving to T3 would be much of a step up. I probably prefer T4, the renovations have spruced things up a bit, and the ST lounge is very nice. But T3 is decent too, the SK lounge is nice (lesser food and drink than the ST lounge, though), and it has better transit connections. Maybe a toss-up, tough to say. I'm not sure that any move is coming soon, but I wouldn't be shocked if it did. |
Originally Posted by pbarnette
(Post 12912395)
One thing to bear in mind is that the *A carriers are already scattered across two terminals, so moving CO to T1 or T3 will only help for some *A connections. Connecting between T1 and T3 still involves a bus connection, just like T4 to T1/T3, though the MCT rises from 75 minutes to 90.
|
I would love for them to go to the T1,2,3 combo areas. T4 is almost as bad as going to T5. I hate schlepping between 4 and 1 and always worry my checked bags will not make it.
|
Too bad they can't just all move to Gatwick, a much better airport. Heathrow has been rated by one travel guidebook series as the worst airport in Europe.
|
Originally Posted by sbm12
(Post 12912114)
There are two theories on the potential for the move. One is that it is imminent. The other is that it will happen several years down the line after the reconstruction of T2. There hasn't been anything "official" stated either way.
To sum up... All of Star Alliance will be moving to a new Terminal 2 in 2014. So it's debatable if Continental want to spend money on a move to a terminal planed for demolition in four years. |
Originally Posted by Carolinian
(Post 12931232)
Too bad they can't just all move to Gatwick, a much better airport. Heathrow has been rated by one travel guidebook series as the worst airport in Europe.
I agree that Gatwick is simply a better designed airport than Heathrow... But Heathrow was built long before we had solid ideas about how an international airport should work. Terminal 1 and 2 being pretty obvious examples of what didn't work well. And part of why Gatwick is easier to get through than Heathrow is that it has a lot less traffic than Heathrow. |
Originally Posted by barberio
(Post 12933166)
I think you mean 'four years down the line'...
|
Originally Posted by sbm12
(Post 12933208)
Nope...I meant "several" just like I typed it. I don't have a ton of faith in their ability to get the construction completed on time. ;)
|
Originally Posted by Carolinian
(Post 12931232)
Too bad they can't just all move to Gatwick, a much better airport. Heathrow has been rated by one travel guidebook series as the worst airport in Europe.
|
Originally Posted by HeathrowGuy
(Post 12933357)
Burn that book. Malpensa is worse than Heathrow by every possible measure.
Replacing Terminal 1 and 2 will go a long way towards correcting that. |
Originally Posted by barberio
(Post 12933541)
Between 1982 ("M4 Airport Spur") and 2002 ("Terminal 5") there was no attempt to build bigger infrastructures, just trying to expand space in the current ones by renovations.
|
I may be confused a bit, but LHR is not going to become a major focus city for CO. I know its important, but its not a *A hub. nothing's going to happen their unless they create a *A hub terminal situation like Skyteam did. and with that, i mean a nice terminal with a nice lounge for premium pax.
they're going to keep the Skyteam lounge for BF pax and that's it. as a *G you're welcome to use any of the numerous other lounges regardless of their locations. once CO relocates, they will reallocate a new lounge for BF pax (possibly soley for BF pax) and then directed the rest of the *G's to other *G lounges. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:57 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.