Trains in China?
#46
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SIN (with a bit of ZRH sprinkled in)
Posts: 9,442
At least to anyone who has used the current "old style" train stations more than they care to remember...As they are neither classical Chinese in style nor especially functional.
Domestic flying in China is not particularly enjoyable IMHO with the exception of Dragonair routes so a big thumbs up for viable alternatives.
Domestic flying in China is not particularly enjoyable IMHO with the exception of Dragonair routes so a big thumbs up for viable alternatives.
Having more alternatives is always a good idea, and while it's true that at the moment factory workers can't enjoy such luxury rides, that might change in couple years. And I've token lots of inner China "fast" (not high-speed trains) like Shanghai-Nanjing (300km, around 2.5hrs) which are pretty much always full or close to full (Hard and Soft) while there are other alternatives on it too (Buses, slower trains) which are cheaper. (SHA-NKG in Soft on the fast connection is around 120 RMB)
More and more Chinese are willing to pay a premium for a comfortable and quick ride, and more and more can afford this. Certainly not all of them are business travellers. Not even the majority I would say. Leisure travel is expanding QUICK - and I mean quick for Chinese circumstances (Their "slow" is even faster what we here call "quick")
The whole project of "new" high speed train system in China is based in demand, not on prestige or anything else. This is a system which is mandatory for the further development of the PR. And so far, their progress is impressing.
#47
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Asia/Europe
Programs: CX, OZ, MU (+AY, DL), Shangri-La, Hilton
Posts: 7,236
I had recently two flights with Hainan Airlines in economy - on a 2.5 hours domestic evening flight, a dinner comparable with "normal" european big carriers like LH, KLM etc. are offering on long-haul (not the european snack, e.g. a dry sandwich) was served, pretty tasty, even with 2 choices (beef or pork) - that was for only around 60 Euro. Air service on the "better" (read: non lowcost) carriers in China has improved a lot in the last few years. (Hainan Airlines is, for example, an official 4 star rated airline...)
Last edited by mosburger; Dec 29, 2009 at 4:38 am Reason: sp
#48
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Derbyshire, UK
Programs: FB Platinum
Posts: 520
I would speculate 95% of the population could not afford to travel on the new train. Middle class in China?
Shanghai Maglev - Stupid Prestige Object
Tianjin High Speed Rail - Olympic Prestige Object
This new line is just another white elephant that will never see any financial profit and the sole purpose is prestige propaganda.
Shanghai Maglev - Stupid Prestige Object
Tianjin High Speed Rail - Olympic Prestige Object
This new line is just another white elephant that will never see any financial profit and the sole purpose is prestige propaganda.
However, like many countries in the world, the extension of faster, reliable transportation links (and the trains can presumably move volumes of people more easily that air) promotes wider economic development which is difficult to quantify. On top of that, there is also the general economic stimulus generated by the initial capital investment in the project
Having said that, the pricing seems topside - the basic Y class Wuhan-Guangzhou is RMB1030 but significant discounts are often available (for next week there are plenty of tickets at RMB380 all in). So there isn't a meaningful pricing advantage to use the service and it will often be more expensive than flying. Flying is faster but by the time you've messed around getting to/from the airports it is probably quite close so why bother with the train? Sure, I might try it once for the experience but I've been on plenty of Chinese bullet trains (260km/hr?) and I suspect this will not be so different
nickyboy
#49
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: BA Gold, JGC Sapphire, OZ Diamond, AF Silver, CX GR, Marriott Lifetime SL
Posts: 3,598
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China_B.../KL10Cb01.html
Actually you may have chance to ride on CRH1 / CRH2 (Shikensen E2), the CRH trainsets ordered for sleeper unit (according to Chinese Wiki http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%92%...%BB%84#CRH2E_2)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wuhan%E...-Speed_Railway
BTW ... take a look at history of Shikansen, they are not any better if without government bail-out (well sort of .. re-organization in other terms)
the GZ - Wuhan is only part of the bigger plan, which include GZ - HK, Wuhan - BJ and Wuhan - Shanghai
For rail projects its always not the rail itself to easily break-even (forget about profit), but it's enabling country-wide economy development, ease road / air traffic (which makes car travel faster) and the development of the rail itself to push employment etc... economist always complain how traffic jam contribute to lost of efficiency which slows the development of one place.
The next decade of China you will see China having High Speed Railway / Subway opening basically every year to ease the traffic due to economy development
Last edited by ChrisLi; Dec 29, 2009 at 4:37 am Reason: o CRH1 also has sleeper .. on SHG PEK route
#51
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: BA Gold, JGC Sapphire, OZ Diamond, AF Silver, CX GR, Marriott Lifetime SL
Posts: 3,598
The Tsuen Mun - Airport Link http://www.hyd.gov.hk/eng/major/road...tmwb/index.htm which enter final design stage, if remember correctly, emphasis on the highway development instead of railway, which for me it translate lower chance of direct train connection
From my own view, Hong Kong better off build the High Speed Rail + 3rd runway instead of High Speed Rail + Twin Airport Link,
With HSR, HKG --> ShenZhen will be 1 hour only by Airport Express + HSR excl wait time (Similar to travel on coach bus ?), and 1.5 hr to Guangzhou
However you will need to enter HK @ HKIA and exit HK @ Kowloon HSR station
Last edited by ChrisLi; Dec 29, 2009 at 5:35 am Reason: Clearification on Entry / Exit Logistics
#52
Ambassador: China
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Malibu Inferno Ground Zero
Programs: UA AA CO
Posts: 4,836
#53
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: BA Gold, JGC Sapphire, OZ Diamond, AF Silver, CX GR, Marriott Lifetime SL
Posts: 3,598
For the noise pollution / change of life caused by living near fast train ... China don't really care about it... as you know in theory China is still communist country, we talk about the development on the race and the country and ready to sacrifice oneself for it ... LOL
Last edited by ChrisLi; Dec 29, 2009 at 8:59 am
#54
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Southeast USA
Programs: various
Posts: 6,710
Although I have only seen the capital investment and fare numbers (so nothing on maintenance, running costs etc) I suspect you are absolutely right that the line will not make a profit as a stand a lone investment
However, like many countries in the world, the extension of faster, reliable transportation links (and the trains can presumably move volumes of people more easily that air) promotes wider economic development which is difficult to quantify. On top of that, there is also the general economic stimulus generated by the initial capital investment in the project
Having said that, the pricing seems topside - the basic Y class Wuhan-Guangzhou is RMB1030 but significant discounts are often available (for next week there are plenty of tickets at RMB380 all in). So there isn't a meaningful pricing advantage to use the service and it will often be more expensive than flying. Flying is faster but by the time you've messed around getting to/from the airports it is probably quite close so why bother with the train? Sure, I might try it once for the experience but I've been on plenty of Chinese bullet trains (260km/hr?) and I suspect this will not be so different
nickyboy
However, like many countries in the world, the extension of faster, reliable transportation links (and the trains can presumably move volumes of people more easily that air) promotes wider economic development which is difficult to quantify. On top of that, there is also the general economic stimulus generated by the initial capital investment in the project
Having said that, the pricing seems topside - the basic Y class Wuhan-Guangzhou is RMB1030 but significant discounts are often available (for next week there are plenty of tickets at RMB380 all in). So there isn't a meaningful pricing advantage to use the service and it will often be more expensive than flying. Flying is faster but by the time you've messed around getting to/from the airports it is probably quite close so why bother with the train? Sure, I might try it once for the experience but I've been on plenty of Chinese bullet trains (260km/hr?) and I suspect this will not be so different
nickyboy
It's good to have multiple options. As for all the existing and this new bullet train, I believe all these are seats only without sleeper cars, and the designation is "1st Class" or "2nd Class" which is a departure from the traditional Chinese train berth nomenclature. The vast majority of average Chinese will be unable to afford this train in the foreseeable future, but this route/corridor probably does have enough business and upper class leisure travellers to not run empty. In my experience in China, I recall very few times I saw ANY form of transportation running anywhere close to empty. Mostly everything runs fairly full to completely full.
Of course as an economic standalone project, this bullet train doesn't make sense in the short term. Who knows about the long term? Subsidizing for the sake of prestige, follow-on economic benefit, or whatever reason you subscribe to is obviously not a problem for the Chinese government. It certainly makes a lot more sense than the Shanghai Maglev, which was strictly an ego-driven exercise in silliness.
#55
Ambassador: China
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Malibu Inferno Ground Zero
Programs: UA AA CO
Posts: 4,836
I don't buy the arguement that route would have been impossible.
#56
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 41,820
I think the Shanghai Maglev could have been a great welcome greeting for travelers. The ticket price should have been adjusted to a rate that semi fills it up and discounted for travelers with same day boarding pass. The main problem is terminates in no man's land. If it stopped in Pudong near Jin Mao Tower then went on over to People's Square it would have really made sense.
I don't buy the arguement that route would have been impossible.
I don't buy the arguement that route would have been impossible.
Obviously, the people that worked on the project envisioned that it would evolve into something more useful. The fact that that hasn't panned out (and probably never will) isn't really their fault.
#57
Ambassador: China
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Malibu Inferno Ground Zero
Programs: UA AA CO
Posts: 4,836
track length of 30km.
Chinese Governement: OK
German engineers: a 30 km length does not place the terminus in a useful location.
Chinese Government: So what, its cheaper.
#58
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SIN (with a bit of ZRH sprinkled in)
Posts: 9,442
If you know the timetable of the Maglev (as frequent traveller into Shanghai) AND have only light luggage with you, it gets you into the city much quicker than by taking Bus #5 or a Taxi.
But the Maglev is advertised very badly. I couldn't believe it when I've been travelling there the first time, but it's an absolutely shame. Even without a real "use", they might have marketed that "special" transport much, much better.
I'd like to check this thread in a few years, once the main connections (BJ-HK) come operational. I guess some posters will have to admit they're wrong by then
#59
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 41,820
#60
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Asia/Europe
Programs: CX, OZ, MU (+AY, DL), Shangri-La, Hilton
Posts: 7,236
I think the original purpose of the Maglev line was always to connect Pudong to Honqgiao airports. Officially, local residents protested against alleged health risks regarding this extension, but this being China that could be an excuse for all kinds of background scenarios.