Connecting In China / Quarantine
#16
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA MileagePlus (Premier Gold); Hilton HHonors (Gold); Chase Ultimate Rewards; Amex Plat
Posts: 6,675
Wow, this is super-interesting, and odd....given that the most 'at risk' individuals on any flight will be cabin crew. Unless they are escorted to their accommodations and then monitored, I'm not 100% sure how this is secure. I'm reasonably skeptical the closing of borders will work anyway, but surely this is a definite weak point.
tb
tb
If you want to exempt cabin crew from quarantine requirements, then they should be required to wear BSL-4 positive pressure suits connected directly to the bleed air system for the duration of the flight. And they should be sent through a shower of disinfectant before removing the suits following the flight.
#17
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: NYC-YUL-CDG-SVO
Programs: Flying Blue Platinum, AAdvantage, Hilton/Hyatt/Marriott
Posts: 160
New memo issued?
Hi, posting for in-laws who are being told by MU staff in Cebu that the 14day LAX quarantine for US Citizens has been extended to all passengers arriving from mainland not just those who’ve been in Hebei
has anyone heard something similar? It’s apparently come through in the last hour
thanks
has anyone heard something similar? It’s apparently come through in the last hour
thanks
#18
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,381
Wow, this is super-interesting, and odd....given that the most 'at risk' individuals on any flight will be cabin crew. Unless they are escorted to their accommodations and then monitored, I'm not 100% sure how this is secure. I'm reasonably skeptical the closing of borders will work anyway, but surely this is a definite weak point.
tb
tb
https://www.whitehouse.gov/president...l-coronavirus/
Section 1. Suspension and Limitation on Entry. The entry into the United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, of all aliens who were physically present within the People’s Republic of China, excluding the Special Administrative Regions of Hong Kong and Macau, during the 14-day period preceding their entry or attempted entry into the United States is hereby suspended and limited subject to section 2 of this proclamation.
Sec. 2. Scope of Suspension and Limitation on Entry.
(a) Section 1 of this proclamation shall not apply to:
(vii) any alien traveling as a nonimmigrant under section 101(a)(15)(C) or (D) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(C) or (D), as a crewmember or any alien otherwise traveling to the United States as air or sea crew;
Sec. 2. Scope of Suspension and Limitation on Entry.
(a) Section 1 of this proclamation shall not apply to:
(vii) any alien traveling as a nonimmigrant under section 101(a)(15)(C) or (D) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(C) or (D), as a crewmember or any alien otherwise traveling to the United States as air or sea crew;
#19
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 765
This sort of thing does give me pause about the real motivation for the travel bans. They seem political rather than medical. Hardly a surprise in the current climate that the US might take advantage of the situation to put the squeeze on China...
#20
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Southeast USA
Programs: various
Posts: 6,710
I disagree with your assessment. I believe the actions being taken by the USA are medical, not political. Hardly a surprise that the US and other countries might decide to put their own welfare above that of the Chinese, whose situation was caused by the screwups by Chinese leadership in not dealing with this publicly and forcefully back in December, when they still had a decent shot at containing the virus spread. If China gets "squeezed" they have nobody to blame but themselves. They didn't learn a lot from their actions during SARS, apparently.
#21
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 765
I disagree with your assessment. I believe the actions being taken by the USA are medical, not political. Hardly a surprise that the US and other countries might decide to put their own welfare above that of the Chinese, whose situation was caused by the screwups by Chinese leadership in not dealing with this publicly and forcefully back in December. If China gets "squeezed" they have nobody to blame but themselves. They didn't learn a lot from their actions during SARS, apparently.
#22
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: 42.1% in PDX , 49.9% in PVG & 8% in the air somewhere
Programs: Marriott Ambassador Elite, UA 1K, AS MVP GLD 75K, DL Pt
Posts: 1,086
Things are changing by the day, anyone traveling, the only reference would be your destination country policy on the day of travel, and has the rules changed in the past few days or not? We can only speculate and hope for the best but prepa for the worse!
And of course there is what will Chinese do? I recalled with little notice they shut down Wuhan, which made sense.
And of course there is what will Chinese do? I recalled with little notice they shut down Wuhan, which made sense.
#23
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA MileagePlus (Premier Gold); Hilton HHonors (Gold); Chase Ultimate Rewards; Amex Plat
Posts: 6,675
I disagree with your assessment. I believe the actions being taken by the USA are medical, not political. Hardly a surprise that the US and other countries might decide to put their own welfare above that of the Chinese, whose situation was caused by the screwups by Chinese leadership in not dealing with this publicly and forcefully back in December, when they still had a decent shot at containing the virus spread. If China gets "squeezed" they have nobody to blame but themselves. They didn't learn a lot from their actions during SARS, apparently.
If there's one group of people who should be blanket banned from entering the US, it is the Chinese leadership, for the debacle of a manner in which they handled this. No need to punish the entire population for what the government did. The WHO should also write a strongly worded statement condemning the Chinese leadership's handling of the situation, in both Chinese and English, so that all of the people in China can read it. Then let the Chinese people figure out what to do about it.
#24
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Southeast USA
Programs: various
Posts: 6,710
While all of that is true, I disagree with the US policy of only allowing citizens and LPRs and a few other narrow categories of people in. It shouldn't matter who you are or what citizenship you hold. If you don't have the virus, you should be allowed in. If you do, then you get held until you are well. If they're not sure, then they hold you until they can be 100% sure you don't have it. If you're not a citizen, then you can pay the US government for your quarantine..
If there's one group of people who should be blanket banned from entering the US, it is the Chinese leadership, for the debacle of a manner in which they handled this. No need to punish the entire population for what the government did. The WHO should also write a strongly worded statement condemning the Chinese leadership's handling of the situation, in both Chinese and English, so that all of the people in China can read it. Then let the Chinese people figure out what to do about it.
#25
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 6,752
Yes, the entire population is suffering the consequences of Chinese local, provincial, and central government policies and decisions. It's not "punishment" since there's no inherent right of Chinese to gain admittance to another country, just because they want it. It is "consequences". Good luck on that WHO statement, they are currently in the pockets of the Chinese....but they have always been a useless organization that cannot be trusted.
#26
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Southeast USA
Programs: various
Posts: 6,710
And while the mean ol' US may be the social justice warriors' favorite punching bag, note that Australia and Singapore are putting pretty much identical policies in place: No foreigner (Chinese or otherwise) who has been in China in the last 14 days gets admitted unless spouse/dependent or permanent resident. Expect more of the same to follow shortly from other countries.
#27
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Tennessee
Programs: SPG, Marriott, United, SWA, AA
Posts: 700
I was not worried about getting sick at our upcoming visit to HKG on Feb 7th which was the first half of our trip. Now I am scared I will not be allowed entry in MNL which was our 2nd stop on the way to Amanpulo! I have no idea what to do? Should I just call CX (if i can get them on the phone)? Oh and then these are OW award TX in J. LAX-HKG and then 5 days later HKG-MNL and the same return. Please give me some advice.
#28
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Southeast USA
Programs: various
Posts: 6,710
The first death from coronavirus outside China has just been reported from the Philippines. 44-year old man from China, the partner of a woman who has been hospitalized with confirmed virus. Apparently he came down with it after her. I believe they did come from Wuhan.
https://www.scmp.com/news/asia/south...l-ban-visitors
I think this could definitely affect the ability of the above poster to reach his destination.
https://www.scmp.com/news/asia/south...l-ban-visitors
I think this could definitely affect the ability of the above poster to reach his destination.
Last edited by jiejie; Feb 1, 2020 at 9:05 pm
#29
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA MileagePlus (Premier Gold); Hilton HHonors (Gold); Chase Ultimate Rewards; Amex Plat
Posts: 6,675
Although, there IS something to be said about not allowing wealthy Chinese to buy their way out of this one like they can so many other things back home. So this could be seen as their penalty for keeping these idiots (in my personal opinion, and especially in regards to how they've handled this outbreak) in power. If they don't like it, they're the ones who can make changes.
#30
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 6,752
At this point, I'm no longer concerned about their failures, only how to try and bring this under control. Towards that end, whatever the PRC has to do however draconian to put a lid on this, they had better do it, and pull out all the stops.