![]() |
Anything over 2000RMB that will stay in China needs to be declared.
http://shanghai.customs.gov.cn/Default.aspx?tabid=5674 |
Originally Posted by JPDM
(Post 23582809)
Anything over 2000RMB that will stay in China needs to be declared.
http://shanghai.customs.gov.cn/Default.aspx?tabid=5674 |
Originally Posted by trueblu
(Post 19759168)
...The chance of being stopped is low, but if it occurs, you run the risk of confiscation.
tb They do keep records though and know exactly about any past incident. |
In my experience large baggage *always* goes through the xray when taking the land border crossings from HK into China. But flying into Pudong or BJ airports - never once have I been asked to xray my bags.
|
Originally Posted by cooljw
(Post 23587813)
In my experience large baggage *always* goes through the xray when taking the land border crossings from HK into China. But flying into Pudong or BJ airports - never once have I been asked to xray my bags.
There were special circumstances involved, though--in the eyes of the customs official I was wheeling out more luggage than normal which caught his eye. Then the fact that my entry stamp was two days earlier drew more attention. At that point my wife caught up (I had finally started walking to get her to quit talking to the baggage people forever) and explained that the airline left our bags behind, we were just picking them up now. (She's a native speaker, I speak a couple of dozen words with a bad enough accent that people likely won't understand me so I left the explanation to her.) End of inspection. Usually they don't look no matter what. There's a nuke alarm there, my wife tripped it and nobody responded. After waiting a bit to see if anyone was going to give us directions we finally went on out. (While there was a second detector that actually was manned it's before the formalities and thus doesn't scan your checked baggage. Even there they didn't do the elementary test of separating her from her carry-ons and sweeping a geiger counter over her to see if the source was dispersed {leftover from medical imaging} or a point source. They simply accepted her word that it was from a heart scan despite having left the card from the lab behind.) |
there are x-rays at PVG which are used from time to time.
Sometimes it is just used for individuals, sometimes everyone has to go through them (the latter is rare). I think last time we were subjected to 'everyone' they were looking for baby formula. |
But they are cracking down on iPhones: http://www.ecns.cn/2014/09-25/136058.shtml
|
Originally Posted by JPDM
(Post 23592180)
But they are cracking down on iPhones: http://www.ecns.cn/2014/09-25/136058.shtml
Crack down on inbound smuggling until the availability in China is normal. There are a lot of Asian wealth from arbitraging price differential with anything and everything. |
Originally Posted by tentseller
(Post 23593090)
There are a lot of Asian wealth from arbitraging price differential with anything and everything.
|
Originally Posted by anacapamalibu
(Post 23595478)
I guess if you can repatriate refugees, currency, human remains, cultural items, battlefield caualties.. you can surely repatriate an iPhone.
|
Originally Posted by tentseller
(Post 23595731)
Not trying to be funny but with family roots spanning HK, Chinese Village and North of the Bay area we did bones shipment from US to China during the late Qing dynasty (19th century).
|
Originally Posted by anacapamalibu
(Post 23595913)
That definately fits the definition of returning to the country of origin.
They were buried in US for seven years. After that the bones were exhumed, boxed and shipped back to relatives in China via HK. |
Originally Posted by tentseller
(Post 23595959)
The joke among Chinese migrant worker in US during the 19th century was "The only way they let you stay is if you die". It was also the wish of all that they be buried at ancestry site back in China
They were buried in US for seven years. After that the bones were exhumed, boxed and shipped back to relatives in China via HK. H. RES. 683 That the House of Representatives regrets the passage of legislation that adversely affected people of Chinese origin in the United States because of their ethnicity. Nothing in this resolution may be construed or relied on to authorize or support any claim, including but not limited to constitutionally based claims, claims for monetary compensation or claims for equitable relief against the United States or any other party, or serve as a settlement of any claim against the United States. |
Originally Posted by anacapamalibu
(Post 23601609)
Hope you understand.
H. RES. 683 That the House of Representatives regrets the passage of legislation that adversely affected people of Chinese origin in the United States because of their ethnicity. Nothing in this resolution may be construed or relied on to authorize or support any claim, including but not limited to constitutionally based claims, claims for monetary compensation or claims for equitable relief against the United States or any other party, or serve as a settlement of any claim against the United States. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:52 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.