FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/checkpoints-borders-policy-debate-687/)
-   -   Behavior Detection: Article (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/checkpoints-borders-policy-debate/975858-behavior-detection-article.html)

TSORon Jul 21, 2009 5:35 am


Originally Posted by PTravel (Post 12091557)
Not Nazi, but Gestapo.

Yeah, that makes it original alright.:rolleyes:


Originally Posted by PTravel (Post 12091557)
All that you say is true. So tell, TSRon, what was your purpose in posting the article?

Information.

Superguy Jul 21, 2009 5:36 am


Originally Posted by TSORon (Post 12098136)
No halls, that is not what I wrote.

“Even with a stack of documentation a mile high some people are going to have your attitude about it. It’s a “no win” situation for the TSA with you folks.”

“To much beer”, right?

You can have a stack that high, Ron, but if it's full of garbage it's just a stack of paper. What's been produced is based on bad science and has already been pointed out why that's so. Even the results of the program show a very high false positive rate and what has been found doesn't even fall within the scope of why TSA was founded in the first place.

Much like TSA's layers, if the layers are ineffective and don't do anything, the layers are useless.

We want good security to win, believe it or not. We don't want stupid security to win. Unfortunately, it has been.

magellan315 Jul 21, 2009 5:43 am


Originally Posted by halls120 (Post 12091241)
:confused: Ron, earlier you referred to a stack of documentation you had on hand to back up your claims. Now you can't prove the BDO approach works?


Originally Posted by TSORon (Post 12098136)
No halls, that is not what I wrote.

“Even with a stack of documentation a mile high some people are going to have your attitude about it. It’s a “no win” situation for the TSA with you folks.”

Actually Ron, here is what you said.


Originally Posted by TSORon (Post 12091104)
Because I see more data than you do. Thats where. Maybe some day I'll post some of it.

So I guess you do have a stack of documentation. By all means feel free to post it and provide us with a link so we can confirm it.

N965VJ Jul 21, 2009 7:44 am


Originally Posted by magellan315 (Post 12098167)
Actually Ron, here is what you said.

Originally Posted by TSORon (Post 12091104)
Because I see more data than you do. Thats where. Maybe some day I'll post some of it.

So I guess you do have a stack of documentation. By all means feel free to post it and provide us with a link so we can confirm it.

He can’t; it’s SSI don’t ‘cha know!

DevilDog438 Jul 21, 2009 7:49 am


Originally Posted by N965VJ (Post 12098635)
He can’t; it’s SSI don’t ‘cha know!

Just like the stack of documentation that I have at my house which shows that my pet rock has stopped untold amounts of terrorists attempting to hijack planes; that is SSI as well.

Tom M. Jul 21, 2009 8:08 am


Originally Posted by TSORon (Post 12098141)
What I am saying is that I get to see the program actually working every day. I get to talk to the BDO's about their job and what they do.

But since you are are not a trained BDO, you can't tell if the BDO's are being truthful when they talk to you.

:D

tsadude1 Jul 21, 2009 12:29 pm


Originally Posted by Tom M. (Post 12098781)
But since you are are not a trained BDO, you can't tell if the BDO's are being truthful when they talk to you.

:D

;););):D

JSmith1969 Jul 21, 2009 12:45 pm


Originally Posted by TSORon (Post 12098141)
I get to talk to the BDO's about their job and what they do. I also get to read the daily reports from headquarters about BDO actions and catches.

And since all of these conversations and reports tell you that BDOs have never, ever, ever, ever caught a single solitary person trying to harm an aircraft, exactly why are you persuaded of its effectiveness? Aside from the fact that you're not very bright?

GUWonder Jul 21, 2009 2:26 pm


Originally Posted by JSmith1969 (Post 12100467)
And since all of these conversations and reports tell you that BDOs have never, ever, ever, ever caught a single solitary person trying to harm an aircraft, exactly why are you persuaded of its effectiveness? Aside from the fact that you're not very bright?

Questioning the TSA faithful is more often than not an exercise in futility -- just look at Kip Hawley. It's an exercise in futility because it all comes down to the faith of the TSA's loyal flock. The words belief and believes tell it all. Faith can get in the way of intelligence and at the TSA that is clearly an issue.

tsadude1 Jul 21, 2009 5:02 pm


Originally Posted by JSmith1969 (Post 12100467)
And since all of these conversations and reports tell you that BDOs have never, ever, ever, ever caught a single solitary person trying to harm an aircraft, exactly why are you persuaded of its effectiveness? Aside from the fact that you're not very bright?

None have been caught because they are too scared. The program has worked.

Superguy Jul 21, 2009 5:45 pm


Originally Posted by tsadude1 (Post 12102035)
None have been caught because they are too scared. The program has worked.

How's that kool aid tasting?

It's not your BDO's that are scaring terrorists away. It's my magic rock. It keeps terrorists away and cowering in fear. How do I know? Have you seen any terrorists at the airport lately? And BTW, I can't show you the documentation as it's SSI.

the_happiness_store Jul 21, 2009 6:06 pm

Look we are all on the wrong track here.

It is not whether any of these procedures are effective or not, it is just about expanding power and keeping jobs.

Terrorists be damned, just use them as an excuse to keep the money coming, and if we have trample on American's rights no big deal, just keep the (taxpayer's) money coming in.

GUWonder Jul 21, 2009 6:11 pm


Originally Posted by the_happiness_store (Post 12102326)
Look we are all on the wrong track here.

It is not whether any of these procedures are effective or not, it is just about expanding power and keeping jobs.

Terrorists be damned, just use them as an excuse to keep the money coming, and if we have trample on American's rights no big deal, just keep the (taxpayer's) money coming in.

That's right:


Originally Posted by GUWonder (Post 12089766)
TSA behavior detection team = TSA workfare's mind-reading work farce force.


the_happiness_store Jul 21, 2009 6:26 pm


Originally Posted by GUWonder (Post 12102348)
That's right:

I apologize for missing your post that said it much better than I did.

Wally Bird Jul 21, 2009 7:02 pm


Originally Posted by tsadude1 (Post 12102035)
None have been caught because they are too scared. The program has worked.

It's not the spotnik nonsense; that would not deter a terrorist. However, I am prepared to concede that terrorists may have been diverted by the increased airport security and visa restrictions following 9/11 but it is equally possible that that was a one-off, the dernier cri of US mainland attacks. Hard to top that, and the FBI has said there is no evidence of terrorist cells in the US anyway.

JSmith1969 Jul 21, 2009 7:20 pm


Originally Posted by tsadude1 (Post 12102035)
None have been caught because they are too scared. The program has worked.

And your proof of this is...?

txrus Jul 21, 2009 9:31 pm


Originally Posted by tsadude1 (Post 12102035)
None have been caught because they are too scared. The program has worked.

And the reason those scared tewwowists didn't then turn their attention to one of the many, many, many commercial airliners flying the friendly skies every day w/o the 'protection' of the SPOTNIKS is...???

These are the same planes that also have untold amounts of toothpaste & shampoo unfrettered by Kippies brought on board by fully-shod passengers, too, don't forget & yet, despite all these dangers, aren't falling out of the skies around us.

How is that possible???

:rolleyes:

ElPasoPilot Jul 21, 2009 11:21 pm


Originally Posted by tsadude1 (Post 12102035)
None have been caught because they are too scared. The program has worked.

Come on, guys, give him a break. He's got a sense of humor! <where's the tongue in cheek emoticon?>

(unlike Ron) :rolleyes:

tsadude1 Jul 22, 2009 1:08 am


Originally Posted by ElPasoPilot (Post 12103653)
Come on, guys, give him a break. He's got a sense of humor! <where's the tongue in cheek emoticon?>

(unlike Ron) :rolleyes:

:p

GUWonder Jul 22, 2009 4:17 am


Originally Posted by ElPasoPilot (Post 12103653)
Come on, guys, give him a break. He's got a sense of humor! <where's the tongue in cheek emoticon?>

^^

tsadude1 Jul 22, 2009 4:24 am


Originally Posted by JSmith1969 (Post 12102669)
And your proof of this is...?

No terrorist incidents involving air travel in the U.S since the implementation of the program.....D'oh! :)

Superguy Jul 22, 2009 5:26 am


Originally Posted by ElPasoPilot (Post 12103653)
Come on, guys, give him a break. He's got a sense of humor! <where's the tongue in cheek emoticon?>

(unlike Ron) :rolleyes:

Gotta love text.

My bad for falling for it. :D

goalie Jul 22, 2009 6:18 am


Originally Posted by the_happiness_store (Post 12102326)
Look we are all on the wrong track here.

It is not whether any of these procedures are effective or not, it is just about expanding power and keeping jobs.

Terrorists be damned, just use them as an excuse to keep the money coming, and if we have trample on American's rights no big deal, just keep the (taxpayer's) money coming in.

you hypocrite! shame on you! how dare you not read your own post......hi-ho-hi-ho, it's to the box i go......:D

JSmith1969 Jul 22, 2009 10:26 am


Originally Posted by tsadude1 (Post 12104270)
No terrorist incidents involving air travel in the U.S since the implementation of the program.....D'oh! :)

Nor have there been any terrorist incidents involving air travel in the US since I replanted that pesky patch of lawn in the backyard in 2002. Correlation does not equal causation; you must describe a causal mechanism by which the BDO program, which TSA's own numbers show have never, ever, ever caught a single person wishing to harm aviation, has "scared away all the terrorists."

Oh, wait, you can't do that, because BDO is BS.

D'Oh!

bajajoes Feb 17, 2011 4:50 pm

BDO's power?
 
Do BDO's have ANY law enforcement authoritah or do they need to call a LEO?

ElPasoPilot Feb 17, 2011 5:05 pm


Originally Posted by bajajoes (Post 15885102)
Do BDO's have ANY law enforcement authoritah or do they need to call a LEO?


They have zero law enforcement authority, although they may try to bluff otherwise.

TSORon Feb 17, 2011 6:12 pm


Originally Posted by bajajoes (Post 15885102)
Do BDO's have ANY law enforcement authoritah or do they need to call a LEO?

Very few members of the TSA have law enforcement authority. We work closely with our local LEO's because law enforcement is outside of our mandate by congress.

RoadGuy Feb 17, 2011 7:46 pm


but I find the concepts of their job fascinating
I find it disturbing that some find it fascinating.

Unless they are hoping for a job doing no work at all.

oboshoe Feb 17, 2011 8:09 pm


Originally Posted by TSORon (Post 12081678)
It does not matter how old the article is, nor how the professor is reimbursed or not reimbursed for his time with the TSA, but if it provides a “value add” to the TSA and its mission.

Actually it really does matter and goes to the heart of his credibility on the matter. Clearly he has a financial stake in this and that is important.

I do agree though, I find the science (if you can all it that) fascinating. I've read a number of books on the subject and have attended short seminars on lie detection and I have found it immensely useful. It's really not hard at all to detect "casual liars" using these techniques.

However..It's one thing to detect dishonesty when you are focusing on a single individual in an interview situation or just a focused discussion vs TSA's method.

TSA is taking unskilled labor and giving them a 40 hour training class. Then having them focus on hundreds of people. Furthermore the people we are concerned about are not "casual liars", but "true believers" who have been training for their terrorist activity for years. For TSA, it boils down to if the person is frowning and if they are patting their pockets.

TSA is simply outmatched here. It's not realistic to have a meaningful outcome and so far, TSA's dismal success record proves that out.

Wally Bird Feb 18, 2011 7:28 am


Originally Posted by TSORon (Post 15885544)
Very few members of the TSA have law enforcement authority. We work closely with our local LEO's because law enforcement is outside of our mandate by congress.

Even Congress gets it right occasionally.

Cartoon Peril Feb 18, 2011 7:33 am


Originally Posted by TSORon (Post 15885544)
Very few members of the TSA have law enforcement authority. We work closely with our local LEO's because law enforcement is outside of our mandate by congress.

One excellent reason for this is because if TSA were law enforcement, whatever legality might inhere in their "administrative search" regime would be substantially degraded, as the administrative search cannot be conducted for the purpose of general law enforcement.

Caradoc Feb 18, 2011 7:42 am


Originally Posted by Cartoon Peril (Post 15888409)
One excellent reason for this is because if TSA were law enforcement, whatever legality might inhere in their "administrative search" regime would be substantially degraded, as the administrative search cannot be conducted for the purpose of general law enforcement.

And yet the TSA just loooves to brag about catching celebrities with doobs... far outside the scope of the TSA "administrative search."

Al Coholic Feb 18, 2011 7:59 am


Originally Posted by tsadude1 (Post 12104270)
No terrorist incidents involving air travel in the U.S since the implementation of the program.....D'oh! :)

I have that rock that repels elephants! See? See? It is working! There are no elephants around!!!!!!!11!!!1!!!1oneone

goalie Feb 18, 2011 11:54 am


Originally Posted by TSORon (Post 15885544)
Very few members of the TSA have law enforcement authority. We work closely with our local LEO's because law enforcement is outside of our mandate by congress.

You know that and I know that ;) but there are many TSO's out there who think and act otherwise :mad:

TSORon Feb 18, 2011 3:04 pm


Originally Posted by goalie (Post 15889899)
You know that and I know that ;) but there are many TSO's out there who think and act otherwise :mad:

Unfortunately I have to agree with you. I wish it were otherwise, but you have hit a nail on the head.

I'm not really sure why this is so, and it certainly is not all that common, but there do seem to be a few frustrated LEO-wannabe's wearing the TSA uniform. I correct them when I see them, but that is just one TSO to another and I suspect that what I have to say has little effect. :(

coachrowsey Feb 18, 2011 3:26 pm

Ron for once I complement you^

IslandBased Feb 18, 2011 7:47 pm


Originally Posted by TSORon (Post 15891058)
Unfortunately I have to agree with you. I wish it were otherwise, but you have hit a nail on the head.

I'm not really sure why this is so, and it certainly is not all that common, but there do seem to be a few frustrated LEO-wannabe's wearing the TSA uniform. I correct them when I see them, but that is just one TSO to another and I suspect that what I have to say has little effect. :(

While I too appreciate your attempt at "correction", if it is done with the same attitude that you sometimes display here, I can see why it is ignored.

Try mentoring, it might work better.....;)

jkhuggins Feb 18, 2011 8:24 pm


Originally Posted by IslandBased (Post 15892115)
While I too appreciate your attempt at "correction", if it is done with the same attitude that you sometimes display here, I can see why it is ignored.

Try mentoring, it might work better.....;)

With all respect to everyone in the conversation ... effective mentoring requires that the recipient be willing to receive the mentoring. I suspect that those TSOs who are "frustrated LEO wanna-be's" would be rather unwilling to accept mentoring, even from the most noble source.

wildcatlh Feb 18, 2011 8:49 pm


Originally Posted by tsadude1 (Post 12104270)
No terrorist incidents involving air travel in the U.S since the implementation of the program.....D'oh! :)

Homer: Not a bear in sight. The Bear Patrol must be working like a charm.
Lisa: That's spacious reasoning, Dad.
Homer: Thank you, dear.
Lisa: By your logic I could claim that this rock keeps tigers away.
Homer: Oh, how does it work?
Lisa: It doesn't work.
Homer: Uh-huh.
Lisa: It's just a stupid rock.
Homer: Uh-huh.
Lisa: But I don't see any tigers around, do you?
[Homer thinks of this, then pulls out some money]
Homer: Lisa, I want to buy your rock.
[Lisa refuses at first, then takes the exchange]

motorguy Feb 18, 2011 8:54 pm


Originally Posted by Wally Bird (Post 12077670)
goalie, ya gotta learn TSAspeak.

They were "suspected terrorists" or in English, suspected of being terrorists. Turns out they weren't, but TSA feels it can still claim some kind of victory.
Twisted minds twist words.

So, tell me, has the TSA ever caught an actual terrorist?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:56 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.