Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

video proof that NZ Customs is much harsher than US Customs

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

video proof that NZ Customs is much harsher than US Customs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 5, 2008, 3:50 pm
  #1  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 31
video proof that NZ Customs is much harsher than US Customs

video proof that NZ Customs is way harsher than US Customs.....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HBCOLjhG18

got a couple of questions after watching this video:

(1) how much is 200 New Zealand dollars anyway?

(2) is the airline partly to blame?

Last edited by bornatsea; Oct 5, 2008 at 5:36 pm
bornatsea is offline  
Old Oct 5, 2008, 4:02 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Caledonia MS.
Programs: RR , Delta FF,United FF
Posts: 148
Thumbs down

I think United is very much to blame. As a airline carrier they have probably already been informed that it is illegal to have the fruit and should not offer it to px.

I think United should be required to pay the fine and have some kind of notification on the plane that it is illegal.
jachot is offline  
Old Oct 5, 2008, 4:11 pm
  #3  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,878
an apple a day......

Originally Posted by bornatsea
video proof that NZ Customs is way harsher than US Customs.....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HBCOLjhG18

got a couple of questions after watching this video:

(1) how much is 200 New Zealand dollars anyway?

(2) is United Airlines partly to blame?
$200 nzd is about $132 usd and where the pax should have declared, i personally think an announcement should have been made on the flight as a "friendly reminder"
goalie is offline  
Old Oct 5, 2008, 4:11 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Homebase: CAE - Formerly, YUL
Programs: US CP, UA, HH Gold, Marriott Plat, DL, AA, CO, ++
Posts: 2,187
I'm amazed that people are crying over a 200NZ$ fine... It sucks, yes, but it happens...

HTSC
HereAndThereSC is offline  
Old Oct 5, 2008, 4:11 pm
  #5  
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Benicia CA
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold 75K, AA 3.8MM, UA 1.1MM, enjoying the retired life
Posts: 31,849
United doesn't fly to New Zealand.
tom911 is offline  
Old Oct 5, 2008, 4:12 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 704
Gone.

Last edited by Peetah; Oct 21, 2008 at 1:29 am
Peetah is offline  
Old Oct 5, 2008, 4:14 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 704
Gone.

Last edited by Peetah; Oct 21, 2008 at 1:29 am
Peetah is offline  
Old Oct 5, 2008, 4:23 pm
  #8  
TTT
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 45° North
Programs: DL DM MM, HH Diamond
Posts: 10,196
You could face similiar consequences if you don't declare fruit when arriving in Hawaii. But I bet you would not be dealt with as politely as the folks in this video were. They read the form and checked the box - obviously not paying attention, too bad for them.
TTT is offline  
Old Oct 5, 2008, 5:07 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: ATX
Programs: AA LT PLT, Marriott LT PLT
Posts: 277
At least the customs officials are giving out complimentary tissues with the NZ$200 citation...they have hearts after all.
boxedlunch is offline  
Old Oct 5, 2008, 5:46 pm
  #10  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 31
Originally Posted by goalie
$200 nzd is about $132 usd and where the pax should have declared, i personally think an announcement should have been made on the flight as a "friendly reminder"
What if the flight attendants handed out the apples just prior to arrival, and the passengers had already completed their customs declaration forms? In a similary situation, I probably wouldn't have remembered to include one apple on my form. I still think the NZ officer was too harsh. A verbal warning and confiscation of the apple should have been enough. I don't even want imagine what they would have done if the passenger was carrying drugs. (summary execution in the customs hall, perhaps?)

A few years ago, I flew from Europe back to the US. I had a small orange(or probably a tangerine) that I got on the flight. Without thinking, I just dropped it in my carry-on bag, figuring I would eat it while waiting in the long immigration line, which turned out to be over an hour. The customs officer spotted the orange in my bag and confiscated it. She was nice and just said "this is a no-no, don't do it again..."
bornatsea is offline  
Old Oct 5, 2008, 6:09 pm
  #11  
Moderator, Hilton Honors
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on a short leash
Programs: some
Posts: 71,419
I'm having trouble with the video but I assume it is from the Border Patrol tv program from a few years ago (Qantas flight, lots of passengers got caught with apples)? For the past few years (at least) all airlines make an announcement while taxiing on arrival about the strict quarantine rules (it is not customs), the importance of correctly filling out the forms, and that there are amnesty bins before you reach the x-ray if you have any food or other items to dispose of. There are also large signs about it around the baggage claim area.

Unfortunately some people ignore all the notices.

The reason for the "harshness" is that NZ relies heavily on agriculture and does not yet have many pests and diseases that are found elsewhere.
Kiwi Flyer is offline  
Old Oct 5, 2008, 9:28 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Programs: CX Silver, QFF Bronze, Mabuhay Miles
Posts: 571
Originally Posted by jachot
I think United is very much to blame. As a airline carrier they have probably already been informed that it is illegal to have the fruit and should not offer it to px.

I think United should be required to pay the fine and have some kind of notification on the plane that it is illegal.
Haven't seen the video, but there is such a thing as personal responsibility (people outside the USA know about this). The passenger would have filled out the immigration/customs form, there would have been signs up in the terminal as well as announcements in the plane on landing.

Passenger has to pay the fine.

Agree with Kiwi Flyer - some people ignore all the notices. Border Secruity (the Australian TV show) has illustrated this many times - with people trying to enter Australia with suitcases full of food. They think they are special and that their dietary requirements overrule the law. They lie, pretend they don't understand english and whinge when they get caught. Customs officials know when there is an honest mistake and when people are trying to cheat.
Crocodile is offline  
Old Oct 5, 2008, 11:23 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Programs: QF WP, AA EXP
Posts: 3,520
This is the one thing that Australia and New Zealand don't mess around with. Carefully read what they don't allow with foodstuffs etc. You will be fined. Has to do with being an island and isolated from a lot of crap...
SNA_Flyer is offline  
Old Oct 6, 2008, 2:32 am
  #14  
Hvr
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Programs: QF LTG:
Posts: 1,859
The penalty in Australia is reserved for those who do not declare that they are carrying food. Border Security had a Vietnamese couple on last week who declared all of their food, none of which was permitted to enter the country.

However, because they had declared all of the food there were no problems nor a fine.

The do regularly show people who do not declare food and get the $200 fine and an entry on their entry record.

I have previously declared food, chocolate biscuits etc and never had a problem.
Hvr is offline  
Old Oct 6, 2008, 8:25 am
  #15  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 31
Originally Posted by Hvr
I have previously declared food, chocolate biscuits etc and never had a problem.

Are chocolates not allowed?
bornatsea is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.