![]() |
Originally Posted by Traveller
I Are TSAs just being dicks in wanting to open it because I am not following someone's "Check all bags" idea?
|
Originally Posted by badtrav
When the TSA opened it and about three heads popped up, it was quickly closed and handed back to my wife.
I assume that if those sandals are still made, Bart sees (or smells) them coming through SAT. |
I would be much more likely to ask the fast food worker to use fresh gloves than the TSA guy.
But I don't bother as it's all cleaner than the average house and certainly MUCH cleaner than a hotel room. |
Originally Posted by TierFlyer
But I don't bother as it's all cleaner than the average house and certainly MUCH cleaner than a hotel room.
|
Originally Posted by PatrickHenry1775
TSA is conducting a search without probable cause or even reasonable individualized suspicion of involvement in criminal activity on my property.
BTW, TSA screeners have told me that they wear gloves only to protect themselves. I have responded that I do not give a rodent's rear end about them, but rather am concerned about my health. 2) Your health, I could really give a s___ less about yours, I am concerned about my health from the filth in your bags... Flying is a privilege not a right... :D |
Originally Posted by whatsinyourbag
1) Don't need probable cause... Don't even need reasonable suspicion... You want to fly, then you give up some of your rights...
2) Your health, I could really give a s___ less about yours, I am concerned about my health from the filth in your bags... Flying is a privilege not a right... :D Are you actually a screener? Would you care to share what airport you work at? While I know there are a lot of screeners out there with the attitude you have displayed in this and other threads, I'm finding it increasingly hard to believe you're for real. |
Originally Posted by justageek
Do you have any understanding that as a civil servant you work for the people you are screening?
Are you actually a screener? Would you care to share what airport you work at? While I know there are a lot of screeners out there with the attitude you have displayed in this and other threads, I'm finding it increasingly hard to believe you're for real. |
Originally Posted by justageek
Do you have any understanding that as a civil servant you work for the people you are screening?
Are you actually a screener? Would you care to share what airport you work at? While I know there are a lot of screeners out there with the attitude you have displayed in this and other threads, I'm finding it increasingly hard to believe you're for real. |
I nicely asked the TSA agent to put clean gloves on today. He was happy to do so. Poor guy, his hands were big and sweaty and he had trouble removing the used gloves and putting on new ones. :D
|
Putting on new gloves benefits the screener too. If you rummage through a bag of nasty dirty laundry and you touch your eye, nose, or mouth with that gloved hand, you just contaminated yourself. If they take off those gloves right when they are done and put them on for their next victim, it's better for all.
Maybe they should consider posting the 4th ammendment at airports. |
Originally Posted by SJC ORD LDR
Maybe they should consider posting the 4th ammendment at airports.
|
Clean gloves, please
Connecting through LHR yesterday, I went through several security checkpoints. At one of them, after passing my bag through the scanner, the guard started to open my bag to check inside. I asked him to put on clean gloves. His gloves were white cloth, not disposable latex. He looked inside but didn't poke through it, then closed it up and walked away.
I couldn't tell if he was satisfied with what he saw, or was unwilling to start a dispute over clean gloves. |
Originally Posted by redburgundy
Connecting through LHR yesterday, I went through several security checkpoints. At one of them, after passing my bag through the scanner, the guard started to open my bag to check inside. I asked him to put on clean gloves. His gloves were white cloth, not disposable latex. He looked inside but didn't poke through it, then closed it up and walked away.
I couldn't tell if he was satisfied with what he saw, or was unwilling to start a dispute over clean gloves. |
I've merged these "clean glove" threads together so discussion can be concentrated in the original thread.
____________________ Cholula Travel Safety/Security Forum Moderator |
I do all the time.
I travel with a CPAP machine for sleep apnea, and this device always requires a separate screening. I make a point as soon as it leaves the belt area, that it's a medical device and will they please use new gloves. Never had a problem getting them to comply with this reasonable request. |
I tend to change my gloves regularly as a matter of course anyway. I always change them after doing a pat down or looking through anything potentially messy like toiletries or cosmetics or searching dirty clothes or a dirty person. Like Bart, I never wear gloves at the xray in order to give my hands some air time, but I always disinfect my hands afterward. I don't usually wear gloves at the metal detector but I have before when I've had to swap in and out continuously with a male to the wanding area. Ironically, the one time I got a passenger peeved at me for wearing gloves was there at the MD. As I understood it, he took it personally as if I felt he was "germy."
|
Originally Posted by SJC ORD LDR
If you rummage through a bag of nasty dirty laundry and you touch your eye, nose, or mouth with that gloved hand, you just contaminated yourself.
No, you shouldn't lick your dirty gloves, but "touching stuff" is not contaminating yourself. The world is not a sterile laboratory and winding yourself up about hypothetical risks at a security checkpoint isn't going to help you on the other five hundred occasions you touch something every day or the food you eat. My god, haven't you looked inside a commercial kitchen? If the risks of "cross contamination" of dirty laundry were so bad, then chambermaids and laundry workers would all be dead after a month on the job. No-one's going to die from walking barefoot across a floor that shoes have stepped on - for example, hundreds of millions of Muslims do it every day in mosques with no apparant negative effects. Relax, people! |
I want to know why all of these people are travelling with toothbrushes just lying around in their toiletry bag without some sort of protective cover on them. At least a baggie or something! I've had a small toothbrush head cover for years (yes, I wash it) and when I got married I bought one for Mr. Xine. I can't imagine just letting it roll around on the inside of a bag -- yuck!
|
Relax yourself. I often have food in my carryon and don't want someone opening it with the same gloves they used to paw through someone else's dirty scivvies.
I could care less what standards you set for inpsections of your own luggage. I'll apply my standards.
Originally Posted by secretbunnyboy
While I can understand the desire of some here to aggravate TSAers, some people (e.g. the above) are just blowing things out of proportion.
No, you shouldn't lick your dirty gloves, but "touching stuff" is not contaminating yourself. The world is not a sterile laboratory and winding yourself up about hypothetical risks at a security checkpoint isn't going to help you on the other five hundred occasions you touch something every day or the food you eat. My god, haven't you looked inside a commercial kitchen? If the risks of "cross contamination" of dirty laundry were so bad, then chambermaids and laundry workers would all be dead after a month on the job. No-one's going to die from walking barefoot across a floor that shoes have stepped on - for example, hundreds of millions of Muslims do it every day in mosques with no apparant negative effects. Relax, people! |
Either way I'm there 8 hours, I couldn't care a less if someone told me to change my gloves. It just delays the passenger, not me. I'll wear 10 pairs of gloves if you want me to.
|
Originally Posted by xinerevelle
I want to know why all of these people are travelling with toothbrushes just lying around in their toiletry bag without some sort of protective cover on them. At least a baggie or something! I've had a small toothbrush head cover for years (yes, I wash it) and when I got married I bought one for Mr. Xine. I can't imagine just letting it roll around on the inside of a bag -- yuck!
I always ask for clean gloves if one (or more) of my bags are being searched. As many others have said, I don't know whose dirty laundry (or other stuff) they've been through before searching my bag (& I'll usually say that if they seem to not want to change gloves). Some screeners don't seem to mind the request to change, others roll their eyes & sigh but do change them. |
Originally Posted by secretbunnyboy
While I can understand the desire of some here to aggravate TSAers, some people (e.g. the above) are just blowing things out of proportion.
No, you shouldn't lick your dirty gloves, but "touching stuff" is not contaminating yourself. The world is not a sterile laboratory and winding yourself up about hypothetical risks at a security checkpoint isn't going to help you on the other five hundred occasions you touch something every day or the food you eat. My god, haven't you looked inside a commercial kitchen? If the risks of "cross contamination" of dirty laundry were so bad, then chambermaids and laundry workers would all be dead after a month on the job. No-one's going to die from walking barefoot across a floor that shoes have stepped on - for example, hundreds of millions of Muslims do it every day in mosques with no apparant negative effects. Relax, people! I'd be more than willing to put money on the fact that more than one person has become ill from some kind of cross contamination at an airport checkpoint, especially those travelers whose health is already compromised. |
Originally Posted by MikeMpls
Relax yourself. I often have food in my carryon and don't want someone opening it with the same gloves they used to paw through someone else's dirty scivvies.
I could care less what standards you set for inpsections of your own luggage. I'll apply my standards. Cheers, J |
Originally Posted by doober
I'd be more than willing to put money on the fact that more than one person has become ill from some kind of cross contamination at an airport checkpoint
|
Originally Posted by jcf27
Has anyone's health been affected by these actions ?? Worse yet, has anyone die?
Are there that many germophobics out there?? Just curious.... Cheers, J Are there that many germophobic TSO's out there?? Just curious, Cheers, 17d |
Originally Posted by secretbunnyboy
Oh, I'm sure. I'm also sure that people get sick from "cross contamination" when car parking attendants don't use a new pair of gloves between touching each hand and steering wheel. The world is not a sterile environment and there's no point in trying to introduce hospital practices into every sphere of life in some futile attempt to make it one.
Interesting that you use this example. After our car is parked in "valet," I certainly do take an antibacterial wipe to the usually-touched surfaces. --LG |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:51 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.