![]() |
The system has been delayed a few times: Entry/Exit System (EES)
|
Originally Posted by OGG flyer
(Post 37002218)
How did I miss the point? I said exactly that. The fact that there are not enough resources is meaningless and unrelated to my post, they will just join the manual queues which would be longer and take even longer with the current number of immigration staff. No different to when I travel to EU on UK passport at times and had to queue for 1hour plus on a few occasions because they had 2 people and 2 desks open out of, say, 12 manual desks that were closed/unmaned. How is this different?
This is about fairness, nothing else. if people have to queue for 4 hours that is irrelevant. Perhaps someone would then do something about it. Why Americans or Canadians , Aussies can use automated gates in EU terminals, but not Brits? Makes no sense! They are not in EU either but can use automated gates. |
Originally Posted by OGG flyer
(Post 37002146)
lack of reciprocity annoys me, EU travelers can breeze through automated gates at LHR, whereas us Brits have to typically use manual desks. Heathrow should disable automated gates for EU passports until reciprocity is established
And are you proposing to cover the extra tax for all the manual handling created by that gesture too since egates are simply money savers, not ways to improve travellers’ lives?… ;) |
Originally Posted by sigma421
(Post 37001892)
Spain, France or Italy would probably be easier choices since they don’t tend to ask any questions at all.
I did this on a Canadian passport, and I was questioned a few times about why my ultimate destination was LHR as I'm stepping off the plane from LHR. They would ask to see my ticket, shrug, and stamp my passport. |
Originally Posted by dougzz
(Post 37002167)
The UK does this for financial reasons. Automate everything possible to save on the cost of a border officer.
|
Originally Posted by bafan
(Post 37001948)
Thanks for the replies, all.
He’s a dual UK/Australian citizen (white and ginger) and was travelling on his UK passport. And, yes, he was stuck in the airport terminal with a vending machine, and apparently a few other people, for company. |
Originally Posted by PAL62V
(Post 37002448)
But if that really is the reason, then having a nice looong queue for EU travellers entering the UK should go a little to beginning the talks on reciprocity. I don't see US immigration adding extra staff for non-US passport holders (not that it matters atm!) and I don't see EU border staff being added either.
|
Originally Posted by kingstontoon
(Post 37002223)
Except on my most recent trip - Prague the weekend before last, just a normal tourism visit - where the officer both entering and exiting spent well over five minutes looking carefully at every single stamp in my passport (there are lots, I visit the EU for the weekend around once a month) clearly trying to reconcile entry and exit dates to work out whether I was over 90 days. I stick a post-it note in my passport and ask officers to stamp where indicated to try and keep my entry and exit stamps together and in sequence but even so this was clearly a struggle for these officers who eventually gave up and stamped me without so much as a smile. So perhaps something has changed recently, or was I just really unlucky this happened both entering and leaving Prague? |
I had similar at BUD last week - they typically haven’t looked all that closely in the past, but the officer had a close look at all my stamps. No questions, though.
|
Originally Posted by OGG flyer
(Post 37002218)
How did I miss the point? I said exactly that. The fact that there are not enough resources is meaningless and unrelated to my post, they will just join the manual queues which would be longer and take even longer with the current number of immigration staff.
|
Originally Posted by NickB
(Post 37002497)
It would be a colossal example of inanely stupid policy of the cutting-your-nose-to-spite-your-face kind.
|
Originally Posted by OGG flyer
(Post 37002146)
lack of reciprocity annoys me, EU travelers can breeze through automated gates at LHR, whereas us Brits have to typically use manual desks. Heathrow should disable automated gates for EU passports until reciprocity is established. I don't have skin in the game , as I also have EU citizenship though need to renew my second passport and am EU born, so can criticise from certain degree of objectivity here
Sorry Honey - I have certainly seen gates for Uk passport holders at Alicante when arriving BA, and certainly at Roissy (CDG). I confess myself amazed at what happened to him. However, I always enter Europe (Schengen on my French passport and Him Indoors on his Irish passports. Maybe it is to do with EU entry post Brexit. I now use my French passport to give to the French or wherever police when leaving Schengen and my UK passport when I arrive in the UK. If I missed thei BAfan Love - did they offer him any explanation for this extraordinary behaviour? I have known the Swedish police waiting on the jetway when we flew in from Madrid. As this has happened to corporate-wage-slave who was coming from the same location. Maybe Spanish arrivals have their antennae twitching.? |
Originally Posted by andrelux
(Post 37002506)
Cough.... eight and a half years' experience of that...
|
I was in Gothenburg recently and immigration were asking all passengers from my BA flight about the purpose of their trip, evidence of funds and return bookings, hotel stays and so on. For such a relatively small airport, it took ages to get through, mainly as people had to find emails or booking confirmations on their phones. On a trip to Madrid and Nice a few weeks later, no questions were asked.
|
I don't think this is an EU/Schengen thing as such but more so down to the individual airport/country on how they process non-Schengen passengers.
It would be quicker to allow UK passengers to use e-gates, followed by a stamp by a passport officer at a booth - I've seen this done in Lisbon and Alicante for UK passport holders and it works well |
Originally Posted by traveller5
(Post 37002535)
I was in Gothenburg recently and immigration were asking all passengers from my BA flight about the purpose of their trip, evidence of funds and return bookings, hotel stays and so on. For such a relatively small airport, it took ages to get through, mainly as people had to find emails or booking confirmations on their phones.
Where I'm staying, how long, proof of return ticket etc. Have had to show tickets, booking emails etc. one one or two occasions. One reason why I avoid the short connections at HEL. A few minutes of questioning and you can miss a flight. |
The question still remains if he had valid travel documents, a confirmed hotel stay and a return ticket out of the country, why was he denied entry?
|
Last time I went to Oslo the lady at border control flipped through my almost full passport full of stamps and just said “You must watch your days in Europe my friend. You must watch. Are you counting? I hope you are counting”
All with no time to respond. Stamped and through I went. |
I was given a piece of knowledge that may prove useful and it has proved correct on several occasions.
If you are able to choose who you go to...be it an immigration officer or a customs officer...always choose the oldest ones. The younger ones have everything to prove to their bosses and are keen to make an impression.The older ones couldn't give a toss as they are relatively senior in their role and don't have anything to prove. The older ones in my experience won't interrogate as much, if at all. |
Originally Posted by fluffymitten
(Post 37002486)
I had similar in Prague last month. On entry the officer was definitely flicking back and forth seemingly trying to reconcile the dates. Can't remember the same on the way out, I think they just stamped and waved me on.
When I was leaving HEL, the office could not find the entry stamp and asked me when it was. However, he was still struggling to find it and I roughly remembered where the stamp was. He finally found it and happily stamped. It's not only me, but I cannot explain why the particular stamp was not easily found! |
Originally Posted by Coffeemadman
(Post 37002586)
Last time I went to Oslo the lady at border control flipped through my almost full passport full of stamps and just said “You must watch your days in Europe my friend. You must watch. Are you counting? I hope you are counting”
All with no time to respond. Stamped and through I went. |
Originally Posted by Dark Blue
(Post 37002614)
Happened to me at HEL the last week. After I entered HEL, I tried to locate the stamp but it was so hard to find it even though the stamp was very clear and not over other stamps. I carefully checked all the pages, and finally found after 10 min or so.
When I was leaving HEL, the office could not find the entry stamp and asked me when it was. However, he was still struggling to find it and I roughly remembered where the stamp was. He finally found it and happily stamped. It's not only me, but I cannot explain why the particular stamp was not easily found! |
I get that they are busy but it’s forever a bug bearer of mine that they don’t try to stamp in the next space to keep the stamps in some kind of chronological order.
|
Originally Posted by Coffeemadman
(Post 37002586)
Last time I went to Oslo the lady at border control flipped through my almost full passport full of stamps and just said “You must watch your days in Europe my friend. You must watch. Are you counting? I hope you are counting”
|
The Nordics are appalling for being picky. I've just checked and despite hundreds of stamps in my 3 year old passport which I'll have to renew soon, I've spent 23 days in Schengen in the last 180. They're welcome to count if they like.
The EU gets way too much of a pass because of Brexit (the "it's all your fault for leaving the EU..." idea). The passport control is atrocious - literally using 19th Century techniques, and the saga with EES and ETIAS would be amusing if it wasn't such a pain in the neck - the technology that's in place is going to be obsolete soon and in comparison to some of even the poorer SE Asia countries is laughable. Actually, outside a few predictable bottlenecks - AMS, BRU, MAD, it's usually not that bad, but given there are attitude issues with the staff that waste everyone's time, it's really very poor. The UK does this better in all aspects, I don't honestly care if it's to save money (that's usually the goal of automation anyway) the system works well. And yes I know they have 28 different systems to reconcile, but keeping a record of in and out isn't all that complex a proposition. |
Originally Posted by cwl
(Post 37002034)
In my experience entering the Nordic countries with a UK passport does attract greater entry scrutiny than other Schengen area borders in terms of both the 90 day rule and purpose of visit with Sweden being the most inquisitorial and pedantic.
|
Originally Posted by OGG flyer
(Post 37002120)
I must say I find this hard to believe. I am sure this happened of course, but is there any more context to this?
UK passport is one of the most valuable in the world, with UK being the 6th largest economy developed nation. I can't see anyone being turned away in EU/Schengen if all valid documents under visa waiver agreements. Staying overnight for a flight is not typically an issue. In some EU/Schengen airports there are even automated kiosks and no need to see immigration (CDG for instance). To say this is highly unusual, is an understatement. Perhaps there is more context to this, not that I blame the poor guy but we don't know how frequently he travels to EU, duration etc There is not enough info in the OP's post to really dig into any depth with this. EDIT: USA is an exception but I have long stopped considering that place a proper developed country lol We’re both lawyers and have no reason to lie for likes. |
Originally Posted by PUCCI GALORE
(Post 37002519)
…If I missed thei BAfan Love - did they offer him any explanation for this extraordinary behaviour? I have known the Swedish police waiting on the jetway when we flew in from Madrid. As this has happened to corporate-wage-slave who was coming from the same location. Maybe Spanish arrivals have their antennae twitching.?
Apparently a few other people were denied entry - including someone who’d flown from the US via LHR, who was also being sent back to LHR. |
Originally Posted by Coffeemadman
(Post 37002586)
Last time I went to Oslo the lady at border control flipped through my almost full passport full of stamps and just said “You must watch your days in Europe my friend. You must watch. Are you counting? I hope you are counting”
All with no time to respond. Stamped and through I went.
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave
(Post 37001926)
I used to get a few blunt questions when entering Sweden - in the days of Apartheid - due to the South African stamps in my passport. More recently over in Norway I was also queried at Tromsø when arriving from MAD, so a purely Schengen trip. I wanted to say my grandfather had fewer problems entering Tromsø in May 1945, but thought better of it.
|
So if they were denied entry and sent back to LHR does that mean that the airline (BA in this case) would be fined or some other sanction applied?
|
Originally Posted by PAL62V
(Post 37002448)
But if that really is the reason, then having a nice looong queue for EU travellers entering the UK should go a little to beginning the talks on reciprocity. I don't see US immigration adding extra staff for non-US passport holders (not that it matters atm!) and I don't see EU border staff being added either.
As an example, France's border force alone, despite plenty of automation (but less than in the UK) is over 25% larger than the UK's despite having nearly twice fewer international entries (France gets a lot more visitors than the UK but the vast majority arrive from another Schengen country without border checks). As for the US, its border force is 6 times larger than the UK's and no, that's nowhere near proportional to the number of entries either. The whole suggestion that somehow, automated border control would not automatically imply very significant cuts in border force numbers (or that its reversal would not necessarily entail significantly larger needs for staff) is a complete non starter. |
Originally Posted by dougzz
(Post 37002167)
The UK does this for financial reasons. Automate everything possible to save on the cost of a border officer.
|
Originally Posted by bafan
(Post 37001883)
So last night my partner flew to Stockholm on the evening BA flight, intending to overnight at an airport hotel and then take the first leg of his flight to JFK via LHR on the morning BA flight.
Obviously, everything was booked and ticketed. But, he was denied entry into Sweden - the immigration staff didn’t believe he had a legitimate reason to enter the country. And apparently they were questioning all arriving pax in detail. He had to spend the night in the airport terminal and he was escorted to the departure gate to ensure he caught his morning flight. So, it could have been a lot worse - although his suitcase is currently lost… But, has this happened to anyone else before ? Is this just a Brexit benefit that we now need to be more aware of ? Certainly makes me more cautious of doing overnight positioning/ex EU flights… 99.99% of people don't do what FT do. I would assume the routing seemed suspicious to the border patrol agent, especially if they are ramping up questioning to everyone; to just overnight at Stockholm to only go back to LHR then to JFK. Why not just fly to JFK directly would be their mind set. |
Originally Posted by BERbound
(Post 37002746)
The financial reason rationale gets reeled out on every thread like this. We aren’t the only European country who needs to save money.
|
Originally Posted by Geordie405
(Post 37002729)
So if they were denied entry and sent back to LHR does that mean that the airline (BA in this case) would be fined or some other sanction applied?
The airline can only go so far with their checks, they're not expected to get loup glasses out and check if documents are fake or manipulated, and are only expected to to take the documents at face value married with what TIMATIC says. Immigration officers usually have the ultimate discretion and power to refuse entry. This could be intelligence based data that their immigration systems have, and entry can be refused irrespective of whether a traveller is asserting visa-free, visa-on-arrival, ETA, or visa based entry, or any other form of entry (possiblity with the exception of diplomats?) |
Originally Posted by bafan
(Post 37002686)
Yes. It happened as described. And nothing more to it.
We’re both lawyers and have no reason to lie for likes. |
Originally Posted by dougzz
(Post 37002167)
The UK does this for financial reasons. Automate everything possible to save on the cost of a border officer.
Originally Posted by BERbound
(Post 37002746)
The financial reason rationale gets reeled out on every thread like this. We aren’t the only European country who needs to save money.
Originally Posted by orbitmic
(Post 37002761)
Indeed, which is why pretty much every European country is moving in that direction, most certainly including Schengen area countries. This has been delayed and in many countries poorly implemented (largely because the infrastructural choices are precisely organised by each country whilst the Schengen rules are area wide so discrepancies lead to huge problems) but be sure that if the whole continent could use a magic wand and switch to full automation they'd be waving like crazy!! Numerous trials of passport less border crossing too for the same reason.
The reality is HMG and especially the FCDO aren't so concerned with how UK nationals are treated abroad -- they don't see this as a problem and won't do anything about it. |
Originally Posted by OGG flyer
(Post 37002218)
How did I miss the point? I said exactly that. The fact that there are not enough resources is meaningless and unrelated to my post, they will just join the manual queues which would be longer and take even longer with the current number of immigration staff. No different to when I travel to EU on UK passport at times and had to queue for 1hour plus on a few occasions because they had 2 people and 2 desks open out of, say, 12 manual desks that were closed/unmaned. How is this different?
This is about fairness, nothing else. if people have to queue for 4 hours that is irrelevant. Perhaps someone would then do something about it. Why Americans or Canadians , Aussies can use automated gates in EU terminals, but not Brits? Makes no sense! They are not in EU either but can use automated gates. |
If the OP hadn't named the airport but had asked us to guess ARN would have been my call. I didn't have a hostile experience there, but it was much more extensive that anywhere else in the EU (and even in the US). Wanted to see every hotel reservation for the trip. 'Why are you changing hotels for the final night?' 'Can we see your return ticket?' Sweden is one of the few places where I still make sure to have everything printed off as their instinct doesn't seem to be to take people at their word.
|
Originally Posted by Never Stansted
(Post 37002814)
If the OP hadn't named the airport but had asked us to guess ARN would have been my call. I didn't have a hostile experience there, but it was much more extensive that anywhere else in the EU (and even in the US). Wanted to see every hotel reservation for the trip. 'Why are you changing hotels for the final night?' 'Can we see your return ticket?' Sweden is one of the few places where I still make sure to have everything printed off as their instinct doesn't seem to be to take people at their word.
They detained all non-Swedes in the pre-border control area for well over 1.5 hours. I can deal with queueing, but the uncertainty of not even knowing whether you could enter the country - they claimed "the border is closed indefinitely, you will be held until the morning" (this was at around midnight) - was most unpleasant. It was only resolved once a critical mass of passengers threatened to call the police or to 'storm' the desks. At that point they magically started processing people manually, just as they could have done from the outset. Allowing Swedes through, but not other EU citizens, was blatant discrimination in breach of the Schengen Border Code. Unfortunately my complaint to the Swedish Ombudsman didn't end up going anywhere because the Swedish border agency said "sorry". Well that's alright then, I guess :rolleyes: Suffice it to say I am boycotting ARN for the foreseeable future. And that's as a dual UK/EU citizen... |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:31 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.