TSA Using Passenger Screening Dogs
#61
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York, NY
Programs: AA Gold. UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt (Lifetime Diamond downgraded to Explorist)
Posts: 6,776
#63
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
#64
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 817
If it’s meant to work like it was claimed to work at ORD, it should speed up things overall by increasing the proportion of people who get screened more akin to the PreCheck screening way.
Chicago, for example, paid for the canine teams at ORD and it did so as to cut down TSA screening delays at the airport. Thereafter, the Chicago government establishment claimed credit for the crowding/delay alleviation and credited their decision to pay for canine teams to get that apparent improvement.
Chicago, for example, paid for the canine teams at ORD and it did so as to cut down TSA screening delays at the airport. Thereafter, the Chicago government establishment claimed credit for the crowding/delay alleviation and credited their decision to pay for canine teams to get that apparent improvement.
#66
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: WAS
Programs: enjoyed being warm spit for a few years on CO/UA but now nothing :(
Posts: 2,507
Other elements of DHS do train dogs for narcotics and other items, such as people, but TSA does not. Aside from that, almost no-one, and certainly no reputable trainer, will train a dog in both explosives and narcotics - the potential for catastrophic mistake is simply too high.
#67
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Seattle, Wash. USA
Posts: 1,531
I don't think they can be trained for both. It's one or the other. Dogs trained to detect drugs get all excited and even paw at the bag when they sniff something, which wouldn't be a good idea if a bag is carrying explosives (explosive-sniffing dogs are trained to sit when they suss something). You'll probably see more of this, since the administration's proposal to consign lithium-ion batts to the cargo hold went down in flames (so to speak). Dogs are just another means of screening for explosives.
#68
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,110
CBP apparently trains dogs to detect both firearms and currency. If a canine can be taught those two things why not other pairs of items?
https://www.cbp.gov/border-security/.../disciplines-2
Canines are taught to detect concealed U.S. currency and firearms.
https://www.cbp.gov/border-security/.../disciplines-2
Canine Currency/Firearms Detection
Canines are taught to detect concealed U.S. currency and firearms.
Both the Officer/Agent and canine are taught the proper search sequences when searching vehicles, aircraft, freight, luggage, mail, passengers and premises.
#69
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
#70
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: HNL
Programs: UA/Hawaiian/Marriott
Posts: 840
#71
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,110
I'll take on face value your statement to be true. Do any other agencies have canines screening passengers? Ever?
#72
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: VPS
Programs: IHG Diamond, Delta PM, Hilton Gold, Accor Gold, Marriott Silver
Posts: 7,265
If you see beagles, it's USDA. They like them for food inspection because the beagles are both very food driven and are seen as non-threatening by passengers. Smaller dogs also typically have a longer lifespan (and working life) than bigger dogs, so possibly less turnover and fewer training expenses in the canine ranks than other agencies that use bigger dogs.
#73
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,735
If you see beagles, it's USDA. They like them for food inspection because the beagles are both very food driven and are seen as non-threatening by passengers. Smaller dogs also typically have a longer lifespan (and working life) than bigger dogs, so possibly less turnover and fewer training expenses in the canine ranks than other agencies that use bigger dogs.
Another reason they use beagles is because beagles are very emphatic when they find something, no missing their signal on an alert. Of course, if you're standing near the culprit, the baying/barking/yapping can get pretty annoying.
Last edited by CDTraveler; Dec 5, 2017 at 12:14 pm
#74
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: WAS
Programs: enjoyed being warm spit for a few years on CO/UA but now nothing :(
Posts: 2,507
There are thousands of law enforcement agencies just in the US so it is not possible to definitively state that none but TSA and its partner agencies are using PSCs. But I have not heard of any US federal entity other than TSA having a PSC program nor have I heard of any airports or mass transit LEA having their own canine teams not supplied by TSA using PSCs.
There is a move afoot on Capitol Hill to augment the number of canines in service for the transportation sector by using what are termed "private sector canines." These are dogs that are sourced and trained by third part contractors. TSA is opposed to this for consistency and quality control purposes; TSA's program is robust and highly respected but it feels it would not have effective oversight over the quality of the dogs and their training if conducted by contractors, even if some/many of them are highly reputable.
Last edited by Section 107; Nov 24, 2017 at 11:54 am Reason: oops - should have been explosives and drugs - fixed now
#75
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,110
A dog can be trained to indicate when it detects both narcotics and drugs, but as mentioned earlier, TSA does not train its dogs to do both, no reputable trainer will do so, and no law enforcement agency, certainly not one in the transportation sector, will employ a canine trained in both. Dogs do make mistakes and could give an incorrect indication for what it has detected; the consequences for such a mistake could be catastrophic and no governmental unit will take that risk.
There are thousands of law enforcement agencies just in the US so it is not possible to definitively state that none but TSA and its partner agencies are using PSCs. But I have not heard of any US federal entity other than TSA having a PSC program nor have I heard of any airports or mass transit LEA having their own canine teams not supplied by TSA using PSCs.
There are thousands of law enforcement agencies just in the US so it is not possible to definitively state that none but TSA and its partner agencies are using PSCs. But I have not heard of any US federal entity other than TSA having a PSC program nor have I heard of any airports or mass transit LEA having their own canine teams not supplied by TSA using PSCs.