Community
Wiki Posts
Search

TSA Using Passenger Screening Dogs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 13, 2017, 10:58 am
  #61  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York, NY
Programs: AA Gold. UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt (Lifetime Diamond downgraded to Explorist)
Posts: 6,776
They also claim to follow their own rules & the law, have respect for people, and prevent terrorism.

Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
TSA claims that they do not have drug detection canines used for baggage screening.
iluv2fly and GoneOffShore like this.
Yoshi212 is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2017, 12:07 pm
  #62  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,110
Originally Posted by Yoshi212
They also claim to follow their own rules & the law, have respect for people, and prevent terrorism.
Yes, my use of the word "claim" was not accidental.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Nov 18, 2017, 5:31 am
  #63  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Not SFO but JFK

Having the WORST @TSA experience at @JetBlue JFK terminal. They’ve been holding us for 30 MINUTES IN LINE while they set up canine screening we didn’t ask for while everyone else passes us!!!! And the attendants are SO RUDE
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Nov 18, 2017, 11:13 am
  #64  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 817
Originally Posted by GUWonder
If it’s meant to work like it was claimed to work at ORD, it should speed up things overall by increasing the proportion of people who get screened more akin to the PreCheck screening way.

Chicago, for example, paid for the canine teams at ORD and it did so as to cut down TSA screening delays at the airport. Thereafter, the Chicago government establishment claimed credit for the crowding/delay alleviation and credited their decision to pay for canine teams to get that apparent improvement.
I saw this done at LAS... it freaked me out because the line was super, super long but it moved quickly since they were sending 1/4 of people through precheck (regardless of if they had it or not) - no removing shoes etc
greggarious is offline  
Old Nov 19, 2017, 12:25 am
  #65  
Moderator: Midwest, Las Vegas & Dining Buzz
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 17,976
Canine gauntlet at RSW (Ft. Meyers) a few days ago.
iluv2fly is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2017, 12:52 pm
  #66  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: WAS
Programs: enjoyed being warm spit for a few years on CO/UA but now nothing :(
Posts: 2,507
Originally Posted by mauve
Do we know if these are drug or explosives trained dogs, or is TSA claiming they’re trained for both?
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
TSA claims that they do not have drug detection canines used for baggage screening.
TSA dogs are NOT trained for narcotics detection. I know a fair amount about TSA's NEDCP and they quite simply do not train for other than explosives.

Other elements of DHS do train dogs for narcotics and other items, such as people, but TSA does not. Aside from that, almost no-one, and certainly no reputable trainer, will train a dog in both explosives and narcotics - the potential for catastrophic mistake is simply too high.
Section 107 is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2017, 2:34 pm
  #67  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Seattle, Wash. USA
Posts: 1,531
Originally Posted by mauve
Do we know if these are drug or explosives trained dogs, or is TSA claiming they’re trained for both?
I don't think they can be trained for both. It's one or the other. Dogs trained to detect drugs get all excited and even paw at the bag when they sniff something, which wouldn't be a good idea if a bag is carrying explosives (explosive-sniffing dogs are trained to sit when they suss something). You'll probably see more of this, since the administration's proposal to consign lithium-ion batts to the cargo hold went down in flames (so to speak). Dogs are just another means of screening for explosives.
chucko is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2017, 2:47 pm
  #68  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,110
CBP apparently trains dogs to detect both firearms and currency. If a canine can be taught those two things why not other pairs of items?

https://www.cbp.gov/border-security/.../disciplines-2

Canine Currency/Firearms Detection

Canines are taught to detect concealed U.S. currency and firearms.
Both the Officer/Agent and canine are taught the proper search sequences when searching vehicles, aircraft, freight, luggage, mail, passengers and premises.

Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2017, 3:10 pm
  #69  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by chucko
I don't think they can be trained for both.
They can be trained for both. Whether the dogs used at TSA screening checkpoints/the line leading to the TSA TDC are trained for both or not is something else. Some of those dogs aren’t TSA dogs.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2017, 4:26 pm
  #70  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: HNL
Programs: UA/Hawaiian/Marriott
Posts: 840
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
TSA claims that they do not have drug detection canines used for baggage screening.
TSA has ZERO K9s that search for dope.... all their K9s search for explosive devices.

CBP and USDA have K9s that search for dope and illegal goods being smuggled into the US....
Bearcat06 is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2017, 4:36 pm
  #71  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,110
Originally Posted by Bearcat06
TSA has ZERO K9s that search for dope.... all their K9s search for explosive devices.

CBP and USDA have K9s that search for dope and illegal goods being smuggled into the US....
I'll take on face value your statement to be true. Do any other agencies have canines screening passengers? Ever?
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2017, 4:51 pm
  #72  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: VPS
Programs: IHG Diamond, Delta PM, Hilton Gold, Accor Gold, Marriott Silver
Posts: 7,265
If you see beagles, it's USDA. They like them for food inspection because the beagles are both very food driven and are seen as non-threatening by passengers. Smaller dogs also typically have a longer lifespan (and working life) than bigger dogs, so possibly less turnover and fewer training expenses in the canine ranks than other agencies that use bigger dogs.
beachmouse is offline  
Old Nov 21, 2017, 8:16 pm
  #73  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,735
Originally Posted by beachmouse
If you see beagles, it's USDA. They like them for food inspection because the beagles are both very food driven and are seen as non-threatening by passengers. Smaller dogs also typically have a longer lifespan (and working life) than bigger dogs, so possibly less turnover and fewer training expenses in the canine ranks than other agencies that use bigger dogs.
Beagles in little green jackets - you know you're back in the USA.

Another reason they use beagles is because beagles are very emphatic when they find something, no missing their signal on an alert. Of course, if you're standing near the culprit, the baying/barking/yapping can get pretty annoying.

Last edited by CDTraveler; Dec 5, 2017 at 12:14 pm
CDTraveler is offline  
Old Nov 24, 2017, 11:40 am
  #74  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: WAS
Programs: enjoyed being warm spit for a few years on CO/UA but now nothing :(
Posts: 2,507
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
I'll take on face value your statement to be true. Do any other agencies have canines screening passengers? Ever?
A dog can be trained to indicate when it detects both explosives and drugs, but as mentioned earlier, TSA does not train its dogs to do both, no reputable trainer will do so, and no law enforcement agency, certainly not one in the transportation sector, will employ a canine trained in both. Dogs do make mistakes and could give an incorrect indication for what it has detected; the consequences for such a mistake could be catastrophic and no governmental unit will take that risk.

There are thousands of law enforcement agencies just in the US so it is not possible to definitively state that none but TSA and its partner agencies are using PSCs. But I have not heard of any US federal entity other than TSA having a PSC program nor have I heard of any airports or mass transit LEA having their own canine teams not supplied by TSA using PSCs.

There is a move afoot on Capitol Hill to augment the number of canines in service for the transportation sector by using what are termed "private sector canines." These are dogs that are sourced and trained by third part contractors. TSA is opposed to this for consistency and quality control purposes; TSA's program is robust and highly respected but it feels it would not have effective oversight over the quality of the dogs and their training if conducted by contractors, even if some/many of them are highly reputable.

Last edited by Section 107; Nov 24, 2017 at 11:54 am Reason: oops - should have been explosives and drugs - fixed now
Section 107 is offline  
Old Nov 24, 2017, 11:51 am
  #75  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,110
Originally Posted by Section 107
A dog can be trained to indicate when it detects both narcotics and drugs, but as mentioned earlier, TSA does not train its dogs to do both, no reputable trainer will do so, and no law enforcement agency, certainly not one in the transportation sector, will employ a canine trained in both. Dogs do make mistakes and could give an incorrect indication for what it has detected; the consequences for such a mistake could be catastrophic and no governmental unit will take that risk.

There are thousands of law enforcement agencies just in the US so it is not possible to definitively state that none but TSA and its partner agencies are using PSCs. But I have not heard of any US federal entity other than TSA having a PSC program nor have I heard of any airports or mass transit LEA having their own canine teams not supplied by TSA using PSCs.
I fail to understand the distinction between narcotics and drugs as far as when a detection dog would be involved. I posted earlier in this thread that CBP trains dogs to detect both currency and firearms so it is clear that dogs can be taught to detect more than one target item. Seems to me that a police search by canine during passenger screening without warrant would be a violation.
Boggie Dog is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.