Mental Patient Escapes and Flies to San Francisco
#16
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards. Tha... that's about it.
Posts: 4,332
Any screw-up, if any, by TSA in this incident pales in comparison to the preceding fiasco at the mental institution. How does a dangerous sex offender, a murderer, casually stroll out of the facility, hop in a cab, and take a leisurely jaunt to the airport? And to boot, he evidently had sexual relations with three staff members? Nut screws and bolts.
Must be the Maui wowie.
Must be the Maui wowie.
Which means he either had the fake ID and enough cash to charter a plane ON HIM when he left the hospital, or he had an accomplice on the outside who met him at the airport to give him the cash and ID. Neither option is very appealing. I hope the relatives in CA who were mentioned to have been minding his money for him are being thoroughly investigated, as they most likely supplied him with the cash, the ID, or both.
As for TSA's screw-up in this case, I doubt that they screwed anything up beyond failing to spot a fake ID, but that is one area where I'll cut them a little slack. They're not really trained to spot phony IDs, they're just trained to make sure the name on the ID matches the name on the BP, and look at the photo to make sure it matches the person who presents it. And to check the ID's dates of validity, since we all know that the photo on an expired ID can no longer be trusted for... some vague reason that I don't really understand.
I agree with everyone else - -ID doesn't matter. The ID check provides no security benefit whatsoever. It was originally put in place to limit security screening to ticketed passengers, so the checkpoints wouldn't become overloaded with families and friends seeing off Gramma or waiting to greet Aunt Marge at the gate. But the bogus idea that the ID check will stop terrorists is laughable, and this case proves it - a guy who has been locked up in a mental hospital for over thirty years was able to procure a fake ID that was good enough to fool TSA, and use it to book a flight (I guess the booking system doesn't actually check an ID for validity, but only looks to see if the name on it is on the NFL). Couldn't a well-funded terr'ist do the same?
#17
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
As for TSA's screw-up in this case, I doubt that they screwed anything up beyond failing to spot a fake ID, but that is one area where I'll cut them a little slack. They're not really trained to spot phony IDs, they're just trained to make sure the name on the ID matches the name on the BP, and look at the photo to make sure it matches the person who presents it. And to check the ID's dates of validity, since we all know that the photo on an expired ID can no longer be trusted for... some vague reason that I don't really understand.
IF the premise of requiring photo ID at a checkpoint is to allow the screener to match the person's live visual appearance with that on the ID card, then the picture on the ID card needs to be "relatively" recent. Expiration dates on the ID card are a simple mechanism to ensure that.
Of course, ID checks have numerous other problems, as you (and many others) have posted here (and on many other threads). I'm certainly not endorsing ID card checks. I'm just explaining why expiration dates on visual images make sense.
#18
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards. Tha... that's about it.
Posts: 4,332
"Greetings, TSA Screener. Here's my expired driver's license that I had when I graduated high school 40 years ago. Since then, I've added fifty pounds, gone bald, grown a mustache and a goatee, and started wearing eyeglasses. But I'm sure you can tell that the photo on the ID matches me, right?"
IF the premise of requiring photo ID at a checkpoint is to allow the screener to match the person's live visual appearance with that on the ID card, then the picture on the ID card needs to be "relatively" recent. Expiration dates on the ID card are a simple mechanism to ensure that.
Of course, ID checks have numerous other problems, as you (and many others) have posted here (and on many other threads). I'm certainly not endorsing ID card checks. I'm just explaining why expiration dates on visual images make sense.
IF the premise of requiring photo ID at a checkpoint is to allow the screener to match the person's live visual appearance with that on the ID card, then the picture on the ID card needs to be "relatively" recent. Expiration dates on the ID card are a simple mechanism to ensure that.
Of course, ID checks have numerous other problems, as you (and many others) have posted here (and on many other threads). I'm certainly not endorsing ID card checks. I'm just explaining why expiration dates on visual images make sense.
#19
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
And therein lies the problem. How does one define "reasonably recent"? Clearly 40 years (as in my strawman) is too long; clearly 40 days is too short. TSA, IIRC, has picked one year as the limit past which they won't accept an expired ID. It's an arbitrary decision, and we could debate what the actual number should be ... but at least it's a clear objective standard.
#20
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,668
It is an arbitrary decision. After all, if a member of ZZ Top shaved his head and beard but had a current DL with hair, is he going to have to provide further proof that he is who he says he is because the visual doesn't match? Many things - injury, plastic surgery, dramatic weight loss/gain, shaving/growing a beard, getting a facial tattoo are just a few - can dramatically change an appearance.
If the guy was properly screened and exited the checkpoint without any harmful contraband, then TSA did their job and any risk - like a nutter attacking people on a plane - was beyond their reasonable control.
If the guy was properly screened and exited the checkpoint without any harmful contraband, then TSA did their job and any risk - like a nutter attacking people on a plane - was beyond their reasonable control.
#21
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,110
And therein lies the problem. How does one define "reasonably recent"? Clearly 40 years (as in my strawman) is too long; clearly 40 days is too short. TSA, IIRC, has picked one year as the limit past which they won't accept an expired ID. It's an arbitrary decision, and we could debate what the actual number should be ... but at least it's a clear objective standard.
Is there a report of what was fake about his ID? Was it something he created on a hospital computer, or an old one he still had or someone else's? I think knowing that would be informative of whether TSA screwed up and not.
#22
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
And therein lies the problem. How does one define "reasonably recent"? Clearly 40 years (as in my strawman) is too long; clearly 40 days is too short. TSA, IIRC, has picked one year as the limit past which they won't accept an expired ID. It's an arbitrary decision, and we could debate what the actual number should be ... but at least it's a clear objective standard.
#23
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
It looks like my memory is faulty. While traveling on expired ID was an explicit possibility in the past, it looks like approaching a checkpoint with an expired ID today now subjects you, at TSA's discretion, to TSA's infamous "identity verification process". I appreciate the correction.
#24
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Under the Cone of Silence
Programs: UA Gold; AA Dirt; HH Diamond; National Emerald; CONTROL SecretAgent Platinum; KAOS EvilFlyer Gold
Posts: 1,499
Aside from investigating the myriad failures throughout this whole episode, I think the bigger concern might be in the government response to this. Some disturbing possibilities I can envision:
1. More/new/improved Name Game
2. Purchasing of fancy, expensive new ID-checking/scanning devices for all airports for untold millions of dollars
3. Using the above new devices to scan/store ID info
4. Expansion of Secure Flight/no-fly list to include all warrants, thus making the checkpoints into dragnets for any/all criminal offenses, whether accurate or not (since traveler probably won't be able to prove immediately if a warrant is in error/outdated/resolved, and thus missing a flight)
1. More/new/improved Name Game
2. Purchasing of fancy, expensive new ID-checking/scanning devices for all airports for untold millions of dollars
3. Using the above new devices to scan/store ID info
4. Expansion of Secure Flight/no-fly list to include all warrants, thus making the checkpoints into dragnets for any/all criminal offenses, whether accurate or not (since traveler probably won't be able to prove immediately if a warrant is in error/outdated/resolved, and thus missing a flight)
#25
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Park, CO
Programs: Tegridy Elite
Posts: 5,678
Saito was able to make his escape with $6,000 he had in cash as well as a "bogus" driver's license that featured his photograph but an alias for the name, he said, declining to reveal how he obtained the identification or the money.
I'd guess that it was a fairly decent fake that someone working in the hospital and/or someone on the outside obtained for him, as this seems to have been pretty well coordinated with assistance from someone...just my guess though without seeing it of course.
#26
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,110
The most detail that's been mentioned so far is this:
http://abcnews.go.com/US/hawaii-psyc...ry?id=51203525
I'd guess that it was a fairly decent fake that someone working in the hospital and/or someone on the outside obtained for him, as this seems to have been pretty well coordinated with assistance from someone...just my guess though without seeing it of course.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/hawaii-psyc...ry?id=51203525
I'd guess that it was a fairly decent fake that someone working in the hospital and/or someone on the outside obtained for him, as this seems to have been pretty well coordinated with assistance from someone...just my guess though without seeing it of course.
http://www.usaidshop.com/driver-license-c-1.html
Apparently good enough to fool some government employees who claim to be on the front lines of the war on terror.
#27
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: AA Gold AAdvantage Elite, Rapids Reward
Posts: 38,321
That's correct. You have to go to get new ID or Driver License. You must have reissued a new expired date. Also, I have unexpired Arizona ID and I have valid ID. I don't like TSA at FLL who complaining about my Arizona ID. I already send email to TSA at FLL and they will get a disciplinary action against the screeners. I informed to my friend in MIA & FLL about what happened.