Battery explodes at MCO and chaos ensues
#6
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: MidSouth
Programs: AA; Delta GM
Posts: 728
The first thing I saw on Twitter were reports from a verified account of an active shooter. THEN maybe 20-30 minutes later, there was a notice from the Orlando police that there was no active shooter; rather, people had been 'scared' of a loud noise. There was no mention in much of Twitterland about a battery exploding or anyone being rescreened.
#7
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
The first thing I saw on Twitter were reports from a verified account of an active shooter. THEN maybe 20-30 minutes later, there was a notice from the Orlando police that there was no active shooter; rather, people had been 'scared' of a loud noise. There was no mention in much of Twitterland about a battery exploding or anyone being rescreened.
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,162
#9
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
What is beyond me is that they KNEW it was a camera battery, why recall planes and rescreen passengers already boarded. Is it because TSA's failures at MCO were so high that they had no confidence that those already screened were, indeed, clear?
Also TSA screeners running and pushing passengers out of the way certainly does give the lie to these people being "officers" - a real officer would stay and help civilians.
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,082
I can't find any reports of that happening but the re-screening of passengers from planes recalled and those in the terminal consisted of just walking through WTMD - at least from what I am reading - after a dog had swept the termial.
What is beyond me is that they KNEW it was a camera battery, why recall planes and rescreen passengers already boarded. Is it because TSA's failures at MCO were so high that they had no confidence that those already screened were, indeed, clear?
Also TSA screeners running and pushing passengers out of the way certainly does give the lie to these people being "officers" - a real officer would stay and help civilians.
What is beyond me is that they KNEW it was a camera battery, why recall planes and rescreen passengers already boarded. Is it because TSA's failures at MCO were so high that they had no confidence that those already screened were, indeed, clear?
Also TSA screeners running and pushing passengers out of the way certainly does give the lie to these people being "officers" - a real officer would stay and help civilians.
You stated the answer to your own question.
TSA's effort to con people into respecting TSA screeners is a failure, just like TSA.
#11
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,638
IIRC, TSA trains its employees to protect themselves in time of crisis. Dealing with pax is not part of their job description - that is the responsibility of airport employees and police.
Unfortunately, any time you have a crisis and there are people in uniform, ordinary citizens assume the folks in uniform have a clue what is going on. I don't think that's misplaced confidence. In my company, we regularly have employee evacuation drills - and they are taken very seriously. Part of the training for the drills involves designated leaders (and backups, and backups for the backups) who are responsible for directing any non-company employees on the premises during a crisis.
In a grade school, everyone looks to the teachers and staff for guidance. In a church, folks look to the pastor and ushers. In a McDonald's, you assume the folks in company uniform are the most knowledgeable about what is going on, where the exits are, etc. In a hospital, you assume anyone in scrubs will have the best advice in a crisis/evacuation situation.
Not to bash TSA, but I am not aware of another organization like it, government or civilian. It deliberately dresses its employees up in LE-like uniforms, it calls them 'officers', and it directs all pax to comply with any and all orders issued by anyone in a TSA uniform at all times, no questions allowed.
Except in times of crisis. Right.
Unfortunately, any time you have a crisis and there are people in uniform, ordinary citizens assume the folks in uniform have a clue what is going on. I don't think that's misplaced confidence. In my company, we regularly have employee evacuation drills - and they are taken very seriously. Part of the training for the drills involves designated leaders (and backups, and backups for the backups) who are responsible for directing any non-company employees on the premises during a crisis.
In a grade school, everyone looks to the teachers and staff for guidance. In a church, folks look to the pastor and ushers. In a McDonald's, you assume the folks in company uniform are the most knowledgeable about what is going on, where the exits are, etc. In a hospital, you assume anyone in scrubs will have the best advice in a crisis/evacuation situation.
Not to bash TSA, but I am not aware of another organization like it, government or civilian. It deliberately dresses its employees up in LE-like uniforms, it calls them 'officers', and it directs all pax to comply with any and all orders issued by anyone in a TSA uniform at all times, no questions allowed.
Except in times of crisis. Right.
#12
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: MidSouth
Programs: AA; Delta GM
Posts: 728
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ATL Lost Luggage
Programs: Kettle with Kryptonium Medallion Tags
Posts: 10,275
The TSA commended the agent, saying he ran the bag away even as panicked passengers "knocked over the queuing stanchions and dropped roller bags, creating loud banging sounds which were perceived as gunshots, further spreading panic throughout the airport."
Another interesting detail:
The TSA agent, a 20-year Army veteran, said he believed the bag to be an improvised explosive device. He placed it between a concrete column and a concrete planter to mitigate any harm that might come with a full explosion.
#14
Join Date: Dec 2007
Programs: DL, WN, US, Avis, AA
Posts: 662
The Atlanta newspaper reported that the "gunshots" were actually queuing stanchions being knocked over:
I accept that stanchions falling onto a concrete floor could easily be perceived to be gunshots, but I'm having a much harder time accepting that the noise from a dropped roller bags could be perceived as a gunshot. Have any FTers ever confused the sound of dropping a roller bag with the sound of a gunshot?
I accept that stanchions falling onto a concrete floor could easily be perceived to be gunshots, but I'm having a much harder time accepting that the noise from a dropped roller bags could be perceived as a gunshot. Have any FTers ever confused the sound of dropping a roller bag with the sound of a gunshot?
#15
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
The Atlanta newspaper reported that the "gunshots" were actually queuing stanchions being knocked over:
I accept that stanchions falling onto a concrete floor could easily be perceived to be gunshots, but I'm having a much harder time accepting that the noise from a dropped roller bags could be perceived as a gunshot. Have any FTers ever confused the sound of dropping a roller bag with the sound of a gunshot?
Another interesting detail:
Link to full article: AJC.com - Army veteran TSA agent runs exploding battery away from passengers Orlando airport (7:18 a.m. Monday, Nov. 13, 2017)
I accept that stanchions falling onto a concrete floor could easily be perceived to be gunshots, but I'm having a much harder time accepting that the noise from a dropped roller bags could be perceived as a gunshot. Have any FTers ever confused the sound of dropping a roller bag with the sound of a gunshot?
Another interesting detail:
Link to full article: AJC.com - Army veteran TSA agent runs exploding battery away from passengers Orlando airport (7:18 a.m. Monday, Nov. 13, 2017)
http://www.wftv.com/news/local/watch...-oia/645873118