Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

Electronic devices ban Europe to the US [merged threads]

Electronic devices ban Europe to the US [merged threads]

Old May 17, 2017, 8:54 pm
  #796  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: LAX, EWR, LHR
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 227
Originally Posted by NickP 1K
Well BBC posted this three hours ago:

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-39956968

Seems like the conclusion is no ban but other changes may occur (I can assume we will see more aggressive gate screening of electronics)

Others

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...n-flights.html

Not seen any recent articles with differing messages.
Its not over yet. To me those articles are reading too much into the press release. This NYT article has more sources: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/17/w...e-us.html?_r=0

Particularity this quote:
The official added that the homeland security secretary, John F. Kelly, could impose the measure in the next several days or weeks.
FL390 is offline  
Old May 17, 2017, 9:44 pm
  #797  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 825
Originally Posted by s2kdriver80
Assuming that the new Europe rule will pretty much mirror the one set for the 10 Middle Eastern countries that is in effect now. What are the exact rules for that implementation? Do they allow battery-less electronics or no? Maybe we can sort of go by that.
No, they do not allow battery-less electronics in the cabin. So if the Europe ban is similar, be prepared to check your camera equipment (or be ready to Fed Ex it home).
artemis is offline  
Old May 17, 2017, 10:24 pm
  #798  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bay Area
Programs: DL SM, UA MP.
Posts: 12,729
That NY Times article has a link to an earlier article about a hidden bomb in Mogadishu, which only killed the bomber and did NOT take down the plane

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/05/m...on-planes.html

And it sounds like it didn't make it thru the scanners, but someone handed it to the bomber after security.
wco81 is offline  
Old May 18, 2017, 4:31 am
  #799  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: KBL
Programs: FB Gold - M&S Gold
Posts: 279
Originally Posted by wco81
That NY Times article has a link to an earlier article about a hidden bomb in Mogadishu, which only killed the bomber and did NOT take down the plane

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/05/m...on-planes.html

And it sounds like it didn't make it thru the scanners, but someone handed it to the bomber after security.
The "security" in Moga airport can hardly be compared to the security in LHR, CDG or FRA. So I don't see how this 15 month old incident in a crappy unsecured airport could be used to justify a ban on flights coming from ultra-secured airports like the French, Brit or Spanish ones...
Enthilza is offline  
Old May 18, 2017, 7:09 am
  #800  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Brussels, London, Geneva, ....
Programs: Priority Club Gold, Eurostar Carte Blanche, formerly BA Gold, formerly KLM silver
Posts: 245
I was nervous that the media interpretation of the communique from the meeting was too optimistic but this seems to support it;

https://apnews.com/da5f5f84f09b4fc4b02e3409086b0a9b

The key point is this "An official who followed the talks said the ban was “off the table” for now. He spoke on condition of anonymity to release details of the sensitive negotiations.".
traveller42 is offline  
Old May 18, 2017, 7:18 am
  #801  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: where lions are led by donkeys...
Programs: Lifetime Gold, Global Entry, Hertz PC, and my wallet
Posts: 20,340
Originally Posted by traveller42
I was nervous that the media interpretation of the communique from the meeting was too optimistic but this seems to support it;

https://apnews.com/da5f5f84f09b4fc4b02e3409086b0a9b

The key point is this "An official who followed the talks said the ban was “off the table” for now. He spoke on condition of anonymity to release details of the sensitive negotiations.".
I was doing ok until I read the ominously worded:

Nonetheless, airlines have said it is merely a matter of time before the ban is put in place.
And if this is true I don't see many of the transatlantic airlines being able to survive:

The initial ban has hit Middle Eastern airlines hardest. Emirates, the Middle East’s largest airline, this month cited the ban as one of the reasons for an 80 percent drop in profits last year. It said the ban had a direct impact on demand for air travel into the U.S. and it faced rising costs from introducing complimentary laptop loans to some passengers.
Silver Fox is offline  
Old May 18, 2017, 7:35 am
  #802  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,703
Originally Posted by Silver Fox



And if this is true I don't see many of the transatlantic airlines being able to survive:


The initial ban has hit Middle Eastern airlines hardest. Emirates, the Middle East’s largest airline, this month cited the ban as one of the reasons for an 80 percent drop in profits last year. It said the ban had a direct impact on demand for air travel into the U.S. and it faced rising costs from introducing complimentary laptop loans to some passengers.
While I am no fan of the ban and I am sympathetic of the plight of the ME3 in this instance I think that is some creative explaining by Emirates. Emirates fiscal year ran through March 31, 2017. The ban was implemented on I think March 24. Thus the ban was in place for only seven days of their fiscal year. It strains credibility to think it had any noticeable impact on their performance that year.

Last edited by 36902BRF; May 18, 2017 at 8:19 am Reason: Math is hard
36902BRF is online now  
Old May 18, 2017, 11:32 am
  #803  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: NYS
Programs: Days of Our Lives, General Hospital
Posts: 1,495
Originally Posted by Dieuwer
will make the US a huge no-go area.
I've begun to wonder if that isn't the real goal: to discourage travel to and from the United States, including by U.S. citizens.
kochleffel is offline  
Old May 18, 2017, 11:54 am
  #804  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: LAX, EWR, LHR
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 227
The Times is reporting that the ban will be in place by the end of the month: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/u...haos-002vgzjwv

Author's Twitter comments about the ban and his response to what other outlets are reporting: twitter.com/bopanc/status/865140555222790144

Last edited by FL390; May 18, 2017 at 11:55 am Reason: Removed direct link to Twitter as it doesn't appear to display
FL390 is offline  
Old May 18, 2017, 11:59 am
  #805  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: LAX, EWR, LHR
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 227
Financial Times reporting worldwide ban and not just Europe: https://www.ft.com/content/a5624c3c-...a-6027b8a20f23

US homeland security officials who met European commissioners in Brussels this week said that if Washington does extend its ban on large electronic devices, Europe would not be singled out and restrictions would apply to all flights to the US.
FL390 is offline  
Old May 18, 2017, 12:16 pm
  #806  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO
Programs: AA Gold
Posts: 3,647
Originally Posted by FL390
Financial Times reporting worldwide ban and not just Europe: https://www.ft.com/content/a5624c3c-...a-6027b8a20f23
Can you post a link to the FT where we can read the article? This link leads to a subscriber only article.
susiesan is offline  
Old May 18, 2017, 12:20 pm
  #807  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pacific Northwest
Programs: UA Gold 1MM, AS 75k, AA Plat, Bonvoyed Gold, Honors Dia, Hyatt Explorer, IHG Plat, ...
Posts: 16,801
Originally Posted by susiesan
Can you post a link to the FT where we can read the article? This link leads to a subscriber only article.
I pasted the quote above into Google, which found a link that worked. I don't know if that URL is any better for you if I paste it here, so just use the "recipe".
notquiteaff is offline  
Old May 18, 2017, 12:26 pm
  #808  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 17,395
Originally Posted by FL390
Financial Times reporting worldwide ban and not just Europe: https://www.ft.com/content/a5624c3c-...a-6027b8a20f23
I guess they think the know-how to build laptop bombs can be stopped at the border since no mention of domestic flights.
I'm still gobsmacked that US officials haven't been pushed hard on this major inconsistency.
And my guess is the only believable reason is the economic disruption it would wreak on the US. And US based carriers. The next question is whether the US gives a damn about their allies' economies at all.
rickg523 is offline  
Old May 18, 2017, 12:34 pm
  #809  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by rickg523
I guess they think the know-how to build laptop bombs can be stopped at the border since no mention of domestic flights.
I'm still gobsmacked that US officials haven't been pushed hard on this major inconsistency.
And my guess is the only believable reason is the economic disruption it would wreak on the US. And US based carriers. The next question is whether the US gives a damn about their allies' economies at all.
The masking of explosives by way of batteries has been known about for decades. It's really not new, not even with regard to laptop batteries. Being able to do so with the laptop powering on is also not rocket science and nowhere close to new.

These characters should be focusing on more effective ETD means more than trying to push in place such a ban in for all travel to the US. And it's all the more ridiculous to exclude travel within the US when the means and know-how knows no borders -- well, North Korea's border may be an exception.
GUWonder is offline  
Old May 18, 2017, 12:39 pm
  #810  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO
Programs: AA Gold
Posts: 3,647
Originally Posted by FL390
Financial Times reporting worldwide ban and not just Europe: https://www.ft.com/content/a5624c3c-...a-6027b8a20f23
And if it becomes a worldwide ban then it might as well become a domestic US ban. What's to prevent a terrorist from checking in his bomb laden laptop from Europe to a city in the US that requires a connection, taking the bomb out of the checked bag before rechecking through to final destination, and carrying the exploding laptop onto the domestic flight?
susiesan is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.