Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

Electronic devices ban Europe to the US [merged threads]

Electronic devices ban Europe to the US [merged threads]

Old May 17, 2017, 3:25 am
  #751  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: where lions are led by donkeys...
Programs: Lifetime Gold, Global Entry, Hertz PC, and my wallet
Posts: 20,339
I seriously hope that, if some of the ideas being mooted become true only for EU-US, then a tit-for-tat US-EU measure is put in place that looks remarkably similar to whatever it does look like after John Kelly has shown his cards.
Silver Fox is offline  
Old May 17, 2017, 3:26 am
  #752  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: PIT
Programs: OZ Diamond, UA Gold
Posts: 9,898
Originally Posted by GUWonder
You mean "may they keep us safe"? A higher risk of batteries and other stuff going up in flames in the cargo hold doesn't seem like a recipe for keeping us safe.
I should have added sane and safe. The laptop ban is idiotic, for a variety of reasons, I'm very happy that the EU is arguing against it. Someone has to stand up to the US.
dinoscool3 is offline  
Old May 17, 2017, 3:54 am
  #753  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Brussels, London, Geneva, ....
Programs: Priority Club Gold, Eurostar Carte Blanche, formerly BA Gold, formerly KLM silver
Posts: 245
Originally Posted by GUWonder
It's not just the British talking and doing the talking against this. The Germans, the French and the Dutch are amongst those involved heading up against a new/expansion ban of sorts. It will be interesting to see if John Kelly can change the weekly news cycle/narrative for his boss.
The UK are more likely to have seen the actual intelligence that motivated this than the Germans, French or Dutch. Also the UK Prime Minister was previously home secretary and is towards the law-and-order / security / authoritarian end of the political spectrum. She might be expected to be particularly sympathetic to security arguments. An authorised briefing to the media is therefore particularly significant.

Last edited by traveller42; May 17, 2017 at 4:08 am
traveller42 is offline  
Old May 17, 2017, 5:08 am
  #754  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by traveller42
The UK are more likely to have seen the actual intelligence that motivated this than the Germans, French or Dutch. Also the UK Prime Minister was previously home secretary and is towards the law-and-order / security / authoritarian end of the political spectrum. She might be expected to be particularly sympathetic to security arguments. An authorised briefing to the media is therefore particularly significant.
The UK relationship with the Saudis and (more so) the Emiratis and Jordanians -- I could go a lot into personal relationships of the ruling Arab cadre, but that's for elsewhere -- is rather different than the relationship of the Germans, Dutch and even the French with those Arabian Peninsula countries. So while the US gets more "intelligence" (than most European countries) from those Arab-majority countries, it's not because the US has any actual foreign-sourced intelligence on this to actually show the UK beyond that which the UK would get anyway regardless of the US.

I agree with you about what May is.
GUWonder is offline  
Old May 17, 2017, 5:41 am
  #755  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Posts: 239
Why is there no talk of banning laptops from passing through every other security checkpoint that uses an x-ray? Courthouses, the Capitol, the White House, etc. Why the tunnel vision and focusing only on airplanes?
Mad_Max_Esq is offline  
Old May 17, 2017, 6:00 am
  #756  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by Mad_Max_Esq
Why is there no talk of banning laptops from passing through every other security checkpoint that uses an x-ray? Courthouses, the Capitol, the White House, etc. Why the tunnel vision and focusing only on airplanes?
Violent, non-governmental actors certainly don't have their eyes on airplanes as targets as much as some governmental actors do. But airplanes going down violently tends to be much bigger news than a huge number of people dying daily in violent car accidents.

Tourists aren't allowed to take laptops into the White House unless as a very special kind of visitor. The Capitol building also has restrictions on tourist visitors coming in with stuff.

The Capitol building has this, all from the public domain:

The following items are strictly prohibited in the Capitol, including the Capitol Visitor Center:

Prohibited BeveragesProhibited FoodProhibited Weapons

Liquid, including water
Food or beverages of any kind, including fruit and unopened packaged food
Aerosol containers
Non-aerosol spray (Prescriptions for medical needs are permitted.)
Any pointed object, e.g. knitting needles and letter openers (Pens and pencils are permitted.)
Any bag larger than 18" wide x 14" high x 8.5" deep
Electric stun guns, martial arts weapons or devices
Guns, replica guns, ammunition, and fireworks
Knives of any size
Mace and pepper spray
Razors and box cutters

Please note that the U.S. Capitol Police are authorized to make exceptions if a prohibited item is determined to be necessary and required to serve child care, medical or other special needs. If you have questions, please call the Office of Congressional Accessibility Services at 202.224.4048.

The following items are not allowed in the Senate and House Galleries:

Battery-operated electronic devices (medical devices are permitted)
Cameras
Cans and bottles
Creams, lotions or perfume
Packages, briefcases, backpacks or suitcases
Strollers
Video recorders or any type of recording device
GUWonder is offline  
Old May 17, 2017, 8:46 am
  #757  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Next stop: "the Israelis told us (about this threat) and they are right on security", or something like that.

How the narrative keeps getting "fixed".
GUWonder is offline  
Old May 17, 2017, 11:06 am
  #758  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Virginia City Highlands
Programs: Nothing anymore after 20 years
Posts: 6,899
Does anybody know what are alternative means to get from FRA to NYC and how much will it cost?
invisible is offline  
Old May 17, 2017, 11:09 am
  #759  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 27,220
Originally Posted by traveller42
Someone in the UK has apparently been talking to the newspapers.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...-eu-officials/

> Senior officials in Whitehall told The Telegraph on Tuesday that the UK security establishment did not believe a laptop ban was justified and were working, alongside European officials, to convince Washington it was unnecessary.
> "We just don't think a laptop ban is justified," the source said, "not for flights from Europe or from the UK."
Best news I've heard all day! Keeping fingers crossed.
ijgordon is offline  
Old May 17, 2017, 11:10 am
  #760  
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: NYC
Posts: 427
Originally Posted by invisible
Does anybody know what are alternative means to get from FRA to NYC and how much will it cost?
Try Google Flights?
jbeans is offline  
Old May 17, 2017, 11:11 am
  #761  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,072
Originally Posted by ijgordon
Best news I've heard all day! Keeping fingers crossed.
If DHS really had the means to implement this ban it would have happened on the 12th when the signs (up thread) were posted in at least one airport.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old May 17, 2017, 11:18 am
  #762  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS
Posts: 15,027
Originally Posted by traveller42
The UK are more likely to have seen the actual intelligence that motivated this than the Germans, French or Dutch.
The "intelligence" was based on the fact that a laptop and soda can bomb were used to bring down a Russian Metrojet aircraft over the Sinai in October 2015.
The "logic" goes like this: Bomb in object X caused accident, thus ban object x.
Dieuwer is offline  
Old May 17, 2017, 11:31 am
  #763  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bay Area
Programs: DL SM, UA MP.
Posts: 12,729
Originally Posted by Dieuwer
The "intelligence" was based on the fact that a laptop and soda can bomb were used to bring down a Russian Metrojet aircraft over the Sinai in October 2015.
The "logic" goes like this: Bomb in object X caused accident, thus ban object x.
Sounded more recent than that, with the claims that they were able to integrate explosive material with battery packs, leaving enough battery to function and for this sabotaged device to pass airport scanners, which apparently ISIS has access to.
wco81 is offline  
Old May 17, 2017, 11:58 am
  #764  
Moderator: Hilton Honors forums
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Marietta, Georgia, United States
Posts: 24,996
Originally Posted by GUWonder
Violent, non-governmental actors certainly don't have their eyes on airplanes as targets as much as some governmental actors do. But airplanes going down violently tends to be much bigger news than a huge number of people dying daily in violent car accidents.
...and unfortunately, an airplane going down has the potential of becoming an unwanted political issue.

“Why did you not do something if you knew about the threat to laptop computers from Europe?”
Originally Posted by Dieuwer
The "intelligence" was based on the fact that a laptop and soda can bomb were used to bring down a Russian Metrojet aircraft over the Sinai in October 2015.
The "logic" goes like this: Bomb in object X caused accident, thus ban object x.
...and yet, people are still flying as passengers on airplanes.

Go figure...
Canarsie is offline  
Old May 17, 2017, 12:49 pm
  #765  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Programs: HH Gold and lowly DL FO
Posts: 250

Press Office

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Press Release


May 17, 2017

Contact: DHS Press Office, 202-282-8010



JOINT STATEMENT BY THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION AND DHS ON AVIATION SECURITY COOPERATION



BRUSSELS – Today, European Commissioner for Migration, Home Affairs and Citizenship, Dimitris Avramopoulos, and European Commissioner for Transport, Violeta Bulc, hosted a delegation from the United States in Brussels, led by Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security Elaine Duke, to discuss issues related to aviation security and safety.



At the meeting, both sides exchanged information on the serious evolving threats to aviation security and approaches to confronting such threats. Participants provided insight into existing aviation security standards and detection capabilities as well as recent security enhancements on both sides of the Atlantic related to large electronic devices placed in checked baggage.



The United States and the European Union reaffirmed their commitment to continue working closely together on aviation security generally, including meeting next week in Washington D.C. to further assess shared risks and solutions for protecting airline passengers, whilst ensuring the smooth functioning of global air travel.

# # #
lexi is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.