Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

Electronic devices ban Europe to the US [merged threads]

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Electronic devices ban Europe to the US [merged threads]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 11, 2017, 12:38 am
  #151  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: HNL
Programs: DL PM/1MM, BW DE (lifetime), HH DE, Marriott PE (lifetime), National Emerald Executive
Posts: 7,204
Easy solution. Global Entry, Nexus, and other pre-cleared low-risk pax can carry laptop aboard. Others can apply for laptop carry-on license (e.g. frequent business travelers who can demonstrate bona fide employment at a real employer qualify). It really impacts business, not leisure, travelers the most, so that is where it should be addressed. Sure, far from perfect, but better than a total ban...though probably neither the airlines nor other countries airport security will want to deal with who gets to bring a laptop aboard or no, so US may need to export TSA or other workers to all foreign airport US bound gates. Either way, this carries a real cost.

Actually, would make the most sense to do everywhere what is done now in Canada: US border clearance is done at origin airport prior to departure, not upon arrival. That would go a long way to making for a truly more secure experience, as far as real credible potential threats are the reason behind this. And then US CBP can be the laptop police.
RealHJ is offline  
Old May 11, 2017, 12:40 am
  #152  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: SPG-Gold
Posts: 371
Just wondering but are not Electronics restricted as part of lost baggage claimed stolen from your luggage? So if you check them you can't get compensated if lost or damaged?


Right from the Intl CoC http://content.delta.com/content/dam...riage_intl.pdf

Precious or other highly valuable items, including without limitation cash, cash equivalents, securities, negotiable instruments, irreplaceable documents, jewelry, silverware, precious metals, works of art, computers, electronic equipment, photographic equipment, and any other items that cannot be easily
replaced if lost or damaged may not be transported in checked baggage.
InsUW2 is offline  
Old May 11, 2017, 12:47 am
  #153  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 825
Originally Posted by RealHJ
Easy solution. Global Entry, Nexus, and other pre-cleared low-risk pax can carry laptop aboard. Others can apply for laptop carry-on license (e.g. frequent business travelers who can demonstrate bona fide employment at a real employer qualify). It really impacts business, not leisure, travelers the most...
Oh, leisure travelers are also badly impacted by this, as the ban also includes tablets such as iPads and Kindles as well as all digital cameras. Plenty of leisure travelers count on being able to take those items with the on their trips, and in particular a smartphone is NOT an adequate substitute for a good camera.
artemis is offline  
Old May 11, 2017, 12:48 am
  #154  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 39
Originally Posted by flyerCO
They don't comply with the size limitations. They get put in the box with my laptop every flight back to US.
If that is the case then I suspect DSLR cameras may fall into that same category?
Hachima is offline  
Old May 11, 2017, 12:52 am
  #155  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 825
Originally Posted by InsUW2
Just wondering but are not Electronics restricted as part of lost baggage claimed stolen from your luggage? So if you check them you can't get compensated if lost or damaged?
As things stand now, yes. So if you are forced to check your DSLR and your laptop and they are stolen, unless your homeowner's policy covers the loss you will be out of luck. (Right now most travel insurance policies also exclude from coverage theft of valuable items from checked bags.)
artemis is offline  
Old May 11, 2017, 12:54 am
  #156  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 825
Originally Posted by Hachima
If that is the case then I suspect DSLR cameras may fall into that same category?
Yes. The lenses (which might contain electronic components as well) may also not be allowed on board. Even most point-and-shoot digital cameras are going to be too big to fit the size guidelines.
artemis is offline  
Old May 11, 2017, 12:59 am
  #157  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bye Delta
Programs: AA EXP, HH Diamond, IHG Plat, Hyatt Plat, Marriott Plat, Nat'l Exec Elite, Avis Presidents Club
Posts: 16,264
Originally Posted by RealHJ
Easy solution. Global Entry, Nexus, and other pre-cleared low-risk pax can carry laptop aboard. Others can apply for laptop carry-on license (e.g. frequent business travelers who can demonstrate bona fide employment at a real employer qualify). It really impacts business, not leisure, travelers the most, so that is where it should be addressed. Sure, far from perfect, but better than a total ban...though probably neither the airlines nor other countries airport security will want to deal with who gets to bring a laptop aboard or no, so US may need to export TSA or other workers to all foreign airport US bound gates. Either way, this carries a real cost.

Actually, would make the most sense to do everywhere what is done now in Canada: US border clearance is done at origin airport prior to departure, not upon arrival. That would go a long way to making for a truly more secure experience, as far as real credible potential threats are the reason behind this. And then US CBP can be the laptop police.
Continuing to expand our border into other countries is the last thing this country should do.
javabytes is offline  
Old May 11, 2017, 12:59 am
  #158  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Hilton Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Antonio
Programs: DL DM, Former AA EXP now AY Plat, AC 75K, NW Plat, Former CO Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 27,040
Originally Posted by RealHJ
Easy solution. Global Entry, Nexus, and other pre-cleared low-risk pax can carry laptop aboard. Others can apply for laptop carry-on license (e.g. frequent business travelers who can demonstrate bona fide employment at a real employer qualify). It really impacts business, not leisure, travelers the most, so that is where it should be addressed. Sure, far from perfect, but better than a total ban...though probably neither the airlines nor other countries airport security will want to deal with who gets to bring a laptop aboard or no, so US may need to export TSA or other workers to all foreign airport US bound gates. Either way, this carries a real cost.

Actually, would make the most sense to do everywhere what is done now in Canada: US border clearance is done at origin airport prior to departure, not upon arrival. That would go a long way to making for a truly more secure experience, as far as real credible potential threats are the reason behind this. And then US CBP can be the laptop police.
Guess what airport bans electronic on flights from? AUH. That's right, an airport with preclearance, meaning upon arrival they're domestic cleared to get on other flights without additional screening.
flyerCO is offline  
Old May 11, 2017, 1:03 am
  #159  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Hilton Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Antonio
Programs: DL DM, Former AA EXP now AY Plat, AC 75K, NW Plat, Former CO Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 27,040
Every effected airline covers lose/damage now that required. Even before the change there was some doubt on the legality of the restrictions under Warsaw Convention/Montreal Protocol.
flyerCO is offline  
Old May 11, 2017, 1:06 am
  #160  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Brussels, London, Geneva, ....
Programs: Priority Club Gold, Eurostar Carte Blanche, formerly BA Gold, formerly KLM silver
Posts: 245
For occasional long haul business travel, take a USB stick with you, buy a new laptop when you arrive and give it to charity before you leave. A cheap new laptop these days doesn't cost that much compared to the cost of the flight.

Either that or go via Canada or Mexico assuming this is security theatre and they aren't bullied into following the US.
traveller42 is offline  
Old May 11, 2017, 1:10 am
  #161  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: SPG-Gold
Posts: 371
Originally Posted by artemis
As things stand now, yes. So if you are forced to check your DSLR and your laptop and they are stolen, unless your homeowner's policy covers the loss you will be out of luck. (Right now most travel insurance policies also exclude from coverage theft of valuable items from checked bags.)
Most insurance policies exclude from theft "that results from a voluntary parting with title or possession of any property by the insured or others to whom the insured has entrusted the property."
InsUW2 is offline  
Old May 11, 2017, 1:27 am
  #162  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Hilton Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Antonio
Programs: DL DM, Former AA EXP now AY Plat, AC 75K, NW Plat, Former CO Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 27,040
Originally Posted by InsUW2
Most insurance policies exclude from theft "that results from a voluntary parting with title or possession of any property by the insured or others to whom the insured has entrusted the property."
However this wouldn't be a voluntary parting. You are involuntarily required to part with possession by law. Plus without seeing the whole section I don't believe it is implying what you're saying. Otherwise homeowners policies wouldn't be recommended as the goto for lost/stolen luggage.
flyerCO is offline  
Old May 11, 2017, 2:06 am
  #163  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Programs: DL PM, MR Titanium/LTP, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 10,130
What a joke. I've been in Europe the past week and the security at every airport has been better than the TSA jokers. I mean in at ATH, they actually made us take out our laptops / iPads / kindles and turn them on to prove they were real. When was the last time the TSA made half that effort.

Depending on how quickly this goes into effect, might impact my travel home, will see how Delta implements in that case.

My guess is there is more danger long-term from all the lithium-ion batteries in the hold than the threat. This will kill the economy and seriously hurt productivity on those long daytime flights from Europe to the US.

Guess the carriers that invested in seatback AVOD will greatly benefit over those who were (or already have) gone to the streaming IFE model.

Air Canada might be seeing a lot more business ex-Europe if Canada doesn't follow suit. If you have to connect anyway in the US might as well connect through Canada if there's an AC flight to your final destination (certainly an option for me going to/from RDU).
Duke787 is offline  
Old May 11, 2017, 2:41 am
  #164  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Programs: LH Senator, Bonvoy Titanium, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 121
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
Step one: Ban and make it as inconvenient as possible for many frequent/business travelers.

Step two: Insist on spending lots and lots of money to screen so that the ban can be rescinded.

Bonus if the huge expenditure also requires the hiring and training of more staff.
Can't echo this enough. Friends of the administration who are involved/invested in security screening could make a good chunk of money this way.
bookeew is offline  
Old May 11, 2017, 3:19 am
  #165  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Programs: UA 1K/MM, EK Gold, CX Silver
Posts: 880
Personally, I would react by moving to night flights for long-haul. Of course that is not always an option. Crazy when the "theatre" takes over reality, but if a TV star can become President - why not?
sabbasolo is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.