Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

TSA wants to get more intimate when doing passenger pat downs.

TSA wants to get more intimate when doing passenger pat downs.

Old Mar 28, 2017, 7:17 pm
  #301  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,072
Originally Posted by petaluma1
And according to that report, the kid left his laptop in its case; it didn't alarm as TSA has been saying.

So the kid was punished by being sexually assaulted in order to teach him the valuable lesson of never leaving his laptop in its case again.
TSA Blog post up. Complete denial of the CBS accounting.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2017, 4:46 am
  #302  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,157
I'm in no way justifying these sexual assaults that we continue to allow to happen. However, given that they are groping our bodies hoping to pick up some sort of residue on their gloves that will set off the ETD machines, I wonder if this would be happening if the infamous puffer machines had worked?
FliesWay2Much is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2017, 5:32 am
  #303  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 245
Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much
I'm in no way justifying these sexual assaults that we continue to allow to happen. However, given that they are groping our bodies hoping to pick up some sort of residue on their gloves that will set off the ETD machines, I wonder if this would be happening if the infamous puffer machines had worked?
Is there any data that shows the current ETD machines work better, or that they have ever detected a legitimate threat?

For that matter, why would TSA think the enhanced patdown works better with the ETD process than the old patdown procedure?
mauve is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2017, 6:03 am
  #304  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
TSA Blog post up. Complete denial of the CBS accounting.
Holy cow! I presume you've read some of the responses by now. How many of the Kool-Aid drinkers are TSA employees? The comments on the blog are in no way representative of Twitter comments or comments elsewhere on line.
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2017, 6:12 am
  #305  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Originally Posted by mauve
Is there any data that shows the current ETD machines work better, or that they have ever detected a legitimate threat?

For that matter, why would TSA think the enhanced patdown works better with the ETD process than the old patdown procedure?
Screeners apparently missed "threats" attached to bodies during the testing in 2015. (IIRC, a pat down missed something taped to a passenger's back that had been initially identified by either MMW or WTMD, as one example.) Therefore, because TSA apparently can't train its people to do a proper pat down (cognitive burdens, you know) they had to turn to teaching them to sexually assault passengers in order to attempt to find non-existent items.
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2017, 6:26 am
  #306  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by petaluma1
Holy cow! I presume you've read some of the responses by now. How many of the Kool-Aid drinkers are TSA employees? The comments on the blog are in no way representative of Twitter comments or comments elsewhere on line.
I'm curious if someone has hired an internet army to respond to the criticism of the TSA. These kind of things are done by some within and beyond government.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2017, 6:40 am
  #307  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Originally Posted by GUWonder
I'm curious if someone has hired an internet army to respond to the criticism of the TSA. These kind of things are done by some within and beyond government.
I am sure that is so in some respects. If you've followed the blog at all you would have noticed that very often comments supportive of the current thread are time-stamped within a few minutes of posting of the thread in question.
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2017, 6:49 am
  #308  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by petaluma1
I am sure that is so in some respects. If you've followed the blog at all you would have noticed that very often comments supportive of the current thread are time-stamped within a few minutes of posting of the thread in question.
I don't usually read that government propaganda, but this time the government propaganda is trying to paint this whole incident as being a myth. Now I see why Baghdad Bob is such a fan of TSA Blogdad Bob.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2017, 6:57 am
  #309  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Originally Posted by GUWonder
I don't usually read that government propaganda, but this time the government propaganda is trying to paint this whole incident as being a myth. Now I see why Baghdad Bob is such a fan of TSA Blogdad Bob.
Burns uses that "myth" graphic every time there's a damage-control thread put up.
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2017, 6:59 am
  #310  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Programs: DL, WN, US, Avis, AA
Posts: 662
Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much
I'm in no way justifying these sexual assaults that we continue to allow to happen. However, given that they are groping our bodies hoping to pick up some sort of residue on their gloves that will set off the ETD machines, I wonder if this would be happening if the infamous puffer machines had worked?
I'm not sure that your assumption, "they are groping our bodies hoping to pick up some sort of residue on their gloves that will set off the ETD machines" is sound. If they are really hoping to find ETD residue it would be much better to directly brush our clothing with the swabs rather than hoping for an indirect transfer from clothing to gloves and then from gloves to swab. If TSA truly thinks that the pat-down is the best way to test for ETD residue then I question their judgement.

More likely the pat-down is:
  • At attempt to appear diligent (security theater),
  • An intimidation tactic to encourage passengers not to opt-out of the scanners,
  • A way for agents to retaliate against any passenger they judge to be problematic,
  • A way for power-tripping agents to "show you who's boss".
T-the-B is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2017, 7:03 am
  #311  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards. Tha... that's about it.
Posts: 4,331
Originally Posted by GUWonder
I'm curious if someone has hired an internet army to respond to the criticism of the TSA. These kind of things are done by some within and beyond government.
I tend to doubt conspiracy theories as being mostly paranoid delusion. Groupthink is a much more plausible explanation for most things of that nature.

In this case, there is no shortage of people who suffer from aerophbia, terrorphobia (a real word, phobic fear of terrorist attack, though it does seem weird), and islamaphobia, who will accept any and all draconian measures purported to keep them "safe". SO I have no doubt that most, if not all, of the comments in all venues supporting this type of pat-down are a legitimate outpouring of support.

I've reached my limit. I'm not flying until this practice is reversed and the targeted area pat-downs for resolving MMW alarms are restored. I don't alarm the MMW every time, but it's happened enough - usually due to sweat - that I now have a fairly high chance of being on the receiving end of one of these sexual assaults, and I don't want to risk ruining a trip by refusing and being escorted from airport property.

I'll drive instead.
WillCAD is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2017, 7:19 am
  #312  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Originally Posted by T-the-B
I'm not sure that your assumption, "they are groping our bodies hoping to pick up some sort of residue on their gloves that will set off the ETD machines" is sound. If they are really hoping to find ETD residue it would be much better to directly brush our clothing with the swabs rather than hoping for an indirect transfer from clothing to gloves and then from gloves to swab. If TSA truly thinks that the pat-down is the best way to test for ETD residue then I question their judgement.

More likely the pat-down is:
  • At attempt to appear diligent (security theater),
  • An intimidation tactic to encourage passengers not to opt-out of the scanners,
  • A way for agents to retaliate against any passenger they judge to be problematic,
  • A way for power-tripping agents to "show you who's boss".

I believe it's a combination of desperation on the part of the TSA to find a real explosive and your list above.

Always remember that sexual assault is not about sex, but about power and control.
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2017, 7:29 am
  #313  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by petaluma1
I believe it's a combination of desperation on the part of the TSA to find a real explosive and your list above.

Always remember that sexual assault is not about sex, but about power and control.
Yes and yes.

Originally Posted by WillCAD
I tend to doubt conspiracy theories as being mostly paranoid delusion. Groupthink is a much more plausible explanation for most things of that nature.

In this case, there is no shortage of people who suffer from aerophbia, terrorphobia (a real word, phobic fear of terrorist attack, though it does seem weird), and islamaphobia, who will accept any and all draconian measures purported to keep them "safe". SO I have no doubt that most, if not all, of the comments in all venues supporting this type of pat-down are a legitimate outpouring of support.

I've reached my limit. I'm not flying until this practice is reversed and the targeted area pat-downs for resolving MMW alarms are restored. I don't alarm the MMW every time, but it's happened enough - usually due to sweat - that I now have a fairly high chance of being on the receiving end of one of these sexual assaults, and I don't want to risk ruining a trip by refusing and being escorted from airport property.

I'll drive instead.
As someone who makes money doing business with governments, I'll just say that it's not a conspiracy theory that created a market for selling services to engage in online PR operations on behalf of interested parties.

I'm sure there are lots of TSA employees and others who casually cheer for the TSA in everything or just about everything the TSA does and go online without being paid to do so. How much of it is a sort of coordinated response and not, who knows.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2017, 7:35 am
  #314  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
<redacted>

<redacted>.

A couple of complaints to the DHS IG could put pressure on him to allow them since not doing so is a violation of your First Amendment rights. Then again, when did TSA ever care about any rights?

Last edited by TWA884; Sep 15, 2018 at 2:04 pm Reason: Redacted quote of deleted post / personal exchange (FT Rule 12.2)
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Mar 29, 2017, 8:20 am
  #315  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,072
Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much
I'm in no way justifying these sexual assaults that we continue to allow to happen. However, given that they are groping our bodies hoping to pick up some sort of residue on their gloves that will set off the ETD machines, I wonder if this would be happening if the infamous puffer machines had worked?
The Puffers worked fine. TSA employees didn't have the skills set to use the tools provided.
Boggie Dog is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.