Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

TSA wants to get more intimate when doing passenger pat downs.

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

TSA wants to get more intimate when doing passenger pat downs.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 17, 2017, 12:46 pm
  #151  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,106
Originally Posted by NotaCriminal
Because should someone else either file an administrative or civil action against TSA/DHS, I want my complaint on the record to be found through either a FOIA request or discovery request. Further, our airport's TSA manager forwards complaints to the Deputy Assistant Federal Security Director of Screening as he always sends feedback up the food chain Will that do anything? Probably not, but at least it's one more tick in the "customer hates it" column.

Further, should I ever decide to take some form of legal or administrative action, I will want my evidence ready that I did in fact complain directly to the TSA as the necessary first step that I've complied with their administrative protocol for complaints.

That's why I filed a complaint with the TSA, as well as letting other entities and my congressional representatives know about the experience and my concerns as to the new protocol. Obviously, YMMV as to bothering with it.
+

Filing with DHS OIG gets your concern on record. Complaining to TSA is like complaining to the guy that just mugged you.
Boggie Dog is online now  
Old Mar 17, 2017, 1:10 pm
  #152  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
+

Filing with DHS OIG gets your concern on record. Complaining to TSA is like complaining to the guy that just mugged you.
Yes, except that now, if you file online, a complaint to the TSA gets you a file number so that they can no longer claim they never got your complaint. However, over all, your chances of getting some action are better if you file with DHS and, as you say, your complaint is on record. I have a suspicion that DHS doesn't have a clue as to how many complaints TSA receives.
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2017, 2:27 pm
  #153  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: CMH
Programs: Delta Gold Medallion, United
Posts: 433
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
+

Filing with DHS OIG gets your concern on record. Complaining to TSA is like complaining to the guy that just mugged you.
I have already filed one with DHS OIG. I've written my congressional representatives, etc.

Administrative law is my day job. As such, I tend to follow administrative procedure to preserve future options. Hence, a complaint to TSA in addition to the others, despite the likely futility.
NotaCriminal is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2017, 2:37 pm
  #154  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,106
Originally Posted by NotaCriminal
I have already filed one with DHS OIG. I've written my congressional representatives, etc.

Administrative law is my day job. As such, I tend to follow administrative procedure to preserve future options. Hence, a complaint to TSA in addition to the others, despite the likely futility.
I wish you all the success in the world but to date getting any kind of satisfaction through TSA is very unlikely. I don't know why but it seems that TSA believes they are exempt from oversight.
Boggie Dog is online now  
Old Mar 17, 2017, 4:47 pm
  #155  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 245
Originally Posted by Badenoch
Exactly!

"Wow, thanks. Now all I need is a happy landing to go along with my happy ending!"
Unfortunately, I expect that's a good way to get thrown out of the sterile area or end up facing criminal charges.

But I would love to watch someone else do it.
mauve is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2017, 5:31 pm
  #156  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,410
Originally Posted by GUWonder
Some breasts with some kind of breast implants (and implant placement) would feel very different than some kinds of breasts with different kind of implants and implant placement; and those would perhaps feel different than breasts without implants. Should the TSA really be doing breast examinations? Such examination is not necessary, even for weapons and explosives interdiction to be done effectively.

And are the TSA screeners going to stroke male genitals to make sure there are no penile implants and they are "all real"? Will they do the same to male breasts?

Welcome to the "romantic" TSA screening:

https://consumerist.com/2017/03/08/s...mer-cia-chief/
I didn't say it was a good reason.

I do think a "breast" made of C4 would not feel anything like the real thing if lifted. (Remember, the scanner can't tell the difference if the edge is carefully feathered.)
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2017, 5:38 pm
  #157  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,106
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
I didn't say it was a good reason.

I do think a "breast" made of C4 would not feel anything like the real thing if lifted. (Remember, the scanner can't tell the difference if the edge is carefully feathered.)

Explosive Trace Portals seem to be the logical solution.
Boggie Dog is online now  
Old Mar 17, 2017, 6:09 pm
  #158  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
I didn't say it was a good reason.

I do think a "breast" made of C4 would not feel anything like the real thing if lifted. (Remember, the scanner can't tell the difference if the edge is carefully feathered.)
I wouldn't be so sure of that. There are some pretty creative concealment methods using prosthetics/prostheses that would be systematically missed by these TSA fondling acts. And there are some "real" breasts, augmented or otherwise, that don't "lift". And C4 isn't the only thing out there for explosives to be "shaped".

Breast fondling isn't required to effectively interdict contraband explosives on a person.

Last edited by GUWonder; Mar 17, 2017 at 6:17 pm
GUWonder is offline  
Old Mar 18, 2017, 10:48 am
  #159  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,668
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
I didn't say it was a good reason.

I do think a "breast" made of C4 would not feel anything like the real thing if lifted. (Remember, the scanner can't tell the difference if the edge is carefully feathered.)
Are we talking about 'lifting' or full-on squeezing and manipulating?

Of course, given that we're talking about TSA, the definition of 'lifting' is subject to each screener's 'discretion', so it may very well include squeezing, smashing, gripping, twisting and pinching.

How does 'lifting' a breast reveal whether it is naturally heavy, heavy because of silicone, heavy because of saline implants, heavy because of post-mastectomy expanders, or heavy because of implanted nefarious substances (like drugs or the fabled liquid explosives)?

Are guys with well-developed pecs going to be similarly assaulted, or will TSA limit its male focus to ramping up the duration and nature of its genital probing?

I was introduced to someone recently who worked for TSA for over a decade. I'm sad to admit that I had zero desire to get to know this person better. All I could do was look at them and wonder how an apparently decent human being could make a living sticking their hands and faces in people's crotches and butt cracks and grabbing breasts, doubling down on harassing people whose only crime is being physically or mentally challenged and wanting to fly. I was so repulsed I shifted around awkwardly to avoid sitting near this individual at dinner.

I have no desire to know more about this person and I made my feelings known. Normal decent people don't do things abusive screeners do. It's possible this person never actually personally groin-chopped anyone or jabbed stiffened fingers into the sensitive privates of a wheel-chair bound partially-paralyzed stroke victim to teach him/her not to show up at a checkpoint if you're physically incapable of 'moving' when a screener orders you to move.

It is not, however, possible that this person worked at TSA for over a decade and never heard about or personally witnessed this behavior. Continuing to work in an environment where your co-workers do this while you stand by and say nothing means you're just as guilty and disgusting as they are.
chollie is offline  
Old Mar 18, 2017, 11:24 am
  #160  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,106
Originally Posted by chollie
Are we talking about 'lifting' or full-on squeezing and manipulating?

Of course, given that we're talking about TSA, the definition of 'lifting' is subject to each screener's 'discretion', so it may very well include squeezing, smashing, gripping, twisting and pinching.

How does 'lifting' a breast reveal whether it is naturally heavy, heavy because of silicone, heavy because of saline implants, heavy because of post-mastectomy expanders, or heavy because of implanted nefarious substances (like drugs or the fabled liquid explosives)?

Are guys with well-developed pecs going to be similarly assaulted, or will TSA limit its male focus to ramping up the duration and nature of its genital probing?

I was introduced to someone recently who worked for TSA for over a decade. I'm sad to admit that I had zero desire to get to know this person better. All I could do was look at them and wonder how an apparently decent human being could make a living sticking their hands and faces in people's crotches and butt cracks and grabbing breasts, doubling down on harassing people whose only crime is being physically or mentally challenged and wanting to fly. I was so repulsed I shifted around awkwardly to avoid sitting near this individual at dinner.

I have no desire to know more about this person and I made my feelings known. Normal decent people don't do things abusive screeners do. It's possible this person never actually personally groin-chopped anyone or jabbed stiffened fingers into the sensitive privates of a wheel-chair bound partially-paralyzed stroke victim to teach him/her not to show up at a checkpoint if you're physically incapable of 'moving' when a screener orders you to move.

It is not, however, possible that this person worked at TSA for over a decade and never heard about or personally witnessed this behavior. Continuing to work in an environment where your co-workers do this while you stand by and say nothing means you're just as guilty and disgusting as they are.
Do you know why they left?

Just speculation but I don't think just lifting breast will disclose if something has been added.

The things TSA is doing are because they have no idea of how to screen people without resorting to extreme measures that simply would not be acceptable.

TSA is trying to prevent another 9/11 where airplanes were used as guided missiles, that threat vector was closed by adding locked and hardened flight deck doors. The biggest threat facing air travelers today are from insiders, the one threat vector that TSA refuses to address. Knives, guns, and such present an individual threat but WTMD, MMW, and X-ray units mitigate that threat. The rest of it is just power building by power hungry government workers.
Boggie Dog is online now  
Old Mar 18, 2017, 12:33 pm
  #161  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,668
If they're really 'just' lifting breasts to see if something is 'artfully concealed' between the torso and a low-hanging breast, then people with sagging fat rolls should also be seeing a new focus on 'lifting' their rolls and folks with ostomy bags will likely be required to lift their bags during the scrutiny - which will require backroom clothing 'rearrangement'.

Also mentioned in TSA's recent announcements was an acknowledgement of something they've been doing all along but have denied: TSO's can exercise their 'discretion' to require pax to 'rearrange' their clothing.

eta: I've met and chatted briefly with TSOs prior to the body scanners and the gropes. I have nothing to say to any current employee. The fact that they continue to work in an environment where they routinely mistreat pax themselves or witness co-workers mistreating pax without saying something or finding another job - sorry, that's just not someone I'm interested in getting to know better.

No surprise that I've flown through the airport the former TSO I was introduced to recently worked at, one particularly rife with pax abuse. The TSO left voluntarily, something family-related that required a relocate over two hours away from an airport, IIRC. I'm glad it wasn't the kind of social setting where a handshake was expected.

Last edited by chollie; Mar 18, 2017 at 12:42 pm
chollie is offline  
Old Mar 18, 2017, 6:57 pm
  #162  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,410
Originally Posted by chollie
Are we talking about 'lifting' or full-on squeezing and manipulating?

Of course, given that we're talking about TSA, the definition of 'lifting' is subject to each screener's 'discretion', so it may very well include squeezing, smashing, gripping, twisting and pinching.

How does 'lifting' a breast reveal whether it is naturally heavy, heavy because of silicone, heavy because of saline implants, heavy because of post-mastectomy expanders, or heavy because of implanted nefarious substances (like drugs or the fabled liquid explosives)?
I'm not talking about explosive implants, but "breasts" that are really a mass of C4. It's not going to lift like flesh.
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2017, 12:55 am
  #163  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
I'm not talking about explosive implants, but "breasts" that are really a mass of C4. It's not going to lift like flesh.
The purpose of the TSA "lifting" breasts is questionable, or at least more questionable than "lifting" scrotums and penises. Looking forward to a TSA scrotum squeeze? Will the TSA be telling people whether the passenger testicles are dropped properly and actually healthy testicles or not? And what about vaginal or rectal or oral concealment? Time for TSA digital inspections of body cavities?

This TSA "more intimate" "fondling" of passengers is ineffective and unnecessarily dehumanizes passengers, for explosive trace detection requires no such intimate contact in order to have a reasonably effective means of contraband WEI interdiction.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2017, 1:14 am
  #164  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,668
If it was just about rubbing every body part to get a good sample for ETD testing, then TSA could let me put on the gloves and publicly rub my pubes vigorously, stroke and squeeze and lift the rest of my body parts, stick my hands inside my pants, and then give up the gloves for testing.
chollie is offline  
Old Mar 19, 2017, 8:27 am
  #165  
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 597
Originally Posted by chollie
Are we talking about 'lifting' or full-on squeezing and manipulating?



I was introduced to someone recently who worked for TSA for over a decade. I'm sad to admit that I had zero desire to get to know this person better. All I could do was look at them and wonder how an apparently decent human being could make a living sticking their hands and faces in people's crotches and butt cracks and grabbing breasts, doubling down on harassing people whose only crime is being physically or mentally challenged and wanting to fly. I was so repulsed I shifted around awkwardly to avoid sitting near this individual at dinner.

I have no desire to know more about this person and I made my feelings known. Normal decent people don't do things abusive screeners do. It's possible this person never actually personally groin-chopped anyone or jabbed stiffened fingers into the sensitive privates of a wheel-chair bound partially-paralyzed stroke victim to teach him/her not to show up at a checkpoint if you're physically incapable of 'moving' when a screener orders you to move.
My Uncle was executive director of the Sanitary Authority in a major metropolitan area - the agency that handled sewage and water treatment. When I was in college, I qualified for a summer job there. Other college kids worked in the office, or in the gardens on the grounds. He put me on a truck, going to the pumping stations in low-lying areas.

After rainstorms, we might have to get dressed up in rubber and plastic suits and go into those stations, wading in sewage waist deep - armed with aluminum rakes to rake logs, rags, trash, and condoms off the grates so that storm water and sewage could pass through. Though that work took less than five percent of our work week, it was as vile and disgusting as anything one can imagine.

I came home from college over Thanksgiving of my freshman year, and asked my Uncle why I ended up on a truck while the other guys had other jobs. His answer still resonates:

"First, I didn't want anyone saying I gave you special treatment. But most important, I wanted you to respect what some have to do people do to provide for their families and put food on the table. And once you've shoveled **** in the sewers, you'll never look down on anyone doing an honest job."


I learned that lesson, and I still believe it. I don't look down on anyone doing an honest job. And that certainly includes TSA screeners.
HomerJay is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.