Executive orders banning entry to US ... [merged threads]
#76
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 245
#81
Moderator: Travel Safety/Security, Travel Tools, California, Los Angeles; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: LAX
Programs: oneword Emerald
Posts: 20,631
#82
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,403
According to WSJ, the ban also applies to dual citizens! I don't have access to the full article but if true, this could even impact naturalized US citizens e.g. those considered citizen of one of the countries by birth, etc.
Here's the link: http://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-vi...ays-1485628654
Here's the link: http://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-vi...ays-1485628654
#83
Moderator: Travel Safety/Security, Travel Tools, California, Los Angeles; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: LAX
Programs: oneword Emerald
Posts: 20,631
#84
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
According to WSJ, the ban also applies to dual citizens! I don't have access to the full article but if true, this could even impact naturalized US citizens e.g. those considered citizen of one of the countries by birth, etc.
Here's the link: http://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-vi...ays-1485628654
Here's the link: http://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-vi...ays-1485628654
#85
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
An official with the Department of Homeland Security who briefed reporters by phone said 109 people who were in transit on airplanes had been denied entry and 173 had not been allowed to get on their planes overseas.
No green-card holders had been ultimately been prevented from entering the U.S. as of Saturday, the official said, though several spent long hours in detention before being allowed in. Abdollah Mostafavi, 80, was released six hours after his flight arrived in San Francisco from Frankfurt.
No green-card holders had been ultimately been prevented from entering the U.S. as of Saturday, the official said, though several spent long hours in detention before being allowed in. Abdollah Mostafavi, 80, was released six hours after his flight arrived in San Francisco from Frankfurt.
I have some doubt about the accuracy of those numbers.
#87
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: IAD
Posts: 735
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-us...ource=facebook
Looks like crews are also affected
"The recent change to the U.S. entry requirements for nationals of 7 countries applies to all travellers and flight operations crew," the spokeswoman said in emailed comments. "We have made the necessary adjustments to our crewing, to comply with the latest requirements."
#88
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dulles, VA
Programs: UA Life Gold, Marriott Life Titanium
Posts: 2,757
https://news.google.com/news/amp?cau...tml#pt0-839996
I have some doubt about the accuracy of those numbers.
I have some doubt about the accuracy of those numbers.
#89
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: GAI
Programs: TK *G, all statuses that come with Ritz, Amex Plat, Citi Prestige cards
Posts: 364
I'm so exhausted at this point that I probably won't be posting here as much today, though I will be at the rally at 1pm today in Boston at Copley Square.
My sister-in-law got a slightly different cancellation email from State a few minutes after the Massachusetts injunction.
There is a more complete FAQ on State's website today, basically saying that Iranians et al can continue to work on cases heading to the National Visa Center, but the NVC is now some sort of visa purgatory where those cases will wait for an all-clear before being released to Ankara or Abu Dhabi (in Iranian cases).
My read of reporting on the MA injunction is that there should now be a window in which ordinary visa holders (not just LPRs) can land at Logan, though it does nothing for those of us worried about cases in the pipeline. I have no idea if that is CBP's read of things or how they are handling things on the ground. I must say that the treatment and questioning of arriving LPRs on Saturday in contrast to, say, Friday, was just bizarre - who knows what they are being directed to investigate and how they are interpreting it on the ground.
My sister-in-law got a slightly different cancellation email from State a few minutes after the Massachusetts injunction.
There is a more complete FAQ on State's website today, basically saying that Iranians et al can continue to work on cases heading to the National Visa Center, but the NVC is now some sort of visa purgatory where those cases will wait for an all-clear before being released to Ankara or Abu Dhabi (in Iranian cases).
My read of reporting on the MA injunction is that there should now be a window in which ordinary visa holders (not just LPRs) can land at Logan, though it does nothing for those of us worried about cases in the pipeline. I have no idea if that is CBP's read of things or how they are handling things on the ground. I must say that the treatment and questioning of arriving LPRs on Saturday in contrast to, say, Friday, was just bizarre - who knows what they are being directed to investigate and how they are interpreting it on the ground.
#90
Moderator: Travel Safety/Security, Travel Tools, California, Los Angeles; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: LAX
Programs: oneword Emerald
Posts: 20,631
Moderator's Note:
2nd Reminder!
Additional posts have been deleted.
Before posting in this thread, please review your message to make sure that it directly pertains to travel and border security and is not political in nature.
Thank you for understanding,
TWA884
Travel Safety/Security co-moderator
This is the Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate forum.
This is not the place to discuss terrorism and violent extremism in general, policies and actions of the Iranian government or anything that is not directly related to travel security and border protection policy.
Posts that are political in nature belong in OMNI/PR. If you wish to debate issues that do not directly pertain to travel and border security, please do so there (access to OMNI/PR is limited to FlyerTalk members who have been on FT for 180 days and have made 180 posts).
Thank you.
TWA884
Travel Safety/Security co-moderator
This is not the place to discuss terrorism and violent extremism in general, policies and actions of the Iranian government or anything that is not directly related to travel security and border protection policy.
Posts that are political in nature belong in OMNI/PR. If you wish to debate issues that do not directly pertain to travel and border security, please do so there (access to OMNI/PR is limited to FlyerTalk members who have been on FT for 180 days and have made 180 posts).
Thank you.
TWA884
Travel Safety/Security co-moderator
Before posting in this thread, please review your message to make sure that it directly pertains to travel and border security and is not political in nature.
Thank you for understanding,
TWA884
Travel Safety/Security co-moderator