FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/checkpoints-borders-policy-debate-687/)
-   -   Is screening about to get LESS secure? (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/checkpoints-borders-policy-debate/1755898-screening-about-get-less-secure.html)

FliesWay2Much Apr 1, 2016 8:00 pm

Fortunately, the TSA and airport screening is pretty irrelevant in the overall counterterrorism effort. It's very effective at security theater, which keeps Congress, the media, and a large percentage of the American public happy and "feeling safe." The only things that happens at an airport checkpoints are:

1. Catching the amateurs, defined as the guy who forgot he had a gun in his carry-on;
2. Catching common criminals using the cover of an "administrative search".
3. Taking on the mission of human trafficking by demanding that little kids state their names in front of their parents at the ID checker interrogation.

Himeno Apr 1, 2016 8:43 pm


Originally Posted by gingersnaps (Post 26421040)
Are you suggesting that private security firm - motivated by profit - would attempt to report security issues/violations to a TSA Management that has shown IT WILL NOT be called out on security issues/violations.

Such a company should report it to Congress. If TSA management is the problem, report the issue to those with oversight of said problem.

Boggie Dog Apr 1, 2016 8:50 pm


Originally Posted by Himeno (Post 26423805)
Such a company should report it to Congress. If TSA management is the problem, report the issue to those with oversight of said problem.

The public has been reporting its problems with TSA to Congress for years, all to no avail.

RadioGirl Apr 3, 2016 11:38 pm


Originally Posted by Boggie Dog (Post 26420476)
If RadioGirl was your boss I bet it would be very hard to BS your way out of a problem.

True. Fortunately the people who work for (and with) me are incredibly competent and working on very hard problems. Consequently, the (very few) mistakes are due to the complexity of our work, are therefore quickly acknowledged, forgiven, rectified, and serve to increase our collective knowledge. No one who tried to BS their way out of it would get hired in the first place. (Hint to TSA?)

Originally Posted by WillCAD (Post 26421037)
RadioGirl for TSA Administrator!
:cool:^^^:cool:

Thanks for your support, but no. ;)
Problem 1: Living in Washington DC. Been there, done that, got the scars.
Problem 2: Imagine what happens at the approval hearing when they find my FT history. :eek:

Boggie Dog Apr 4, 2016 9:05 am


Originally Posted by RadioGirl (Post 26432480)
True. Fortunately the people who work for (and with) me are incredibly competent and working on very hard problems. Consequently, the (very few) mistakes are due to the complexity of our work, are therefore quickly acknowledged, forgiven, rectified, and serve to increase our collective knowledge. No one who tried to BS their way out of it would get hired in the first place. (Hint to TSA?)

Thanks for your support, but no. ;)
Problem 1: Living in Washington DC. Been there, done that, got the scars.
Problem 2: Imagine what happens at the approval hearing when they find my FT history. :eek:

You could commute.;)

JoeBas Apr 4, 2016 12:53 pm


Originally Posted by Boggie Dog (Post 26422314)
I just Googled "TSA Screening Test Failures" and received 363,000 returns.

Thanks Boggie. I was going to do the whole "Let me google that for you" thing, but I think this is sufficient. ;)

WillCAD Apr 4, 2016 4:21 pm


Originally Posted by Boggie Dog (Post 26434161)
You could commute.;)

If she did, she'd be the first TSA administrator who actually flew commercial on a regular basis.

Boggie Dog Apr 4, 2016 5:18 pm


Originally Posted by WillCAD (Post 26436714)
If she did, she'd be the first TSA administrator who actually flew commercial on a regular basis.

Who said she would go commercial?

Section 107 Apr 5, 2016 12:33 pm


Originally Posted by Boggie Dog (Post 26436971)
Who said she would go commercial?

DHS has lots of aircraft at its disposal - but only in rare circumstances would an Administrator get to use one. However, she could hitch rides with the Commandant of the Coasties or with CBP...

One of my Dad's friends used to rate a helo when he was with DoD. Alas, he was never so bold as to bring us along to play golf.

Boggie Dog Apr 5, 2016 1:03 pm


Originally Posted by Section 107 (Post 26440914)
DHS has lots of aircraft at its disposal - but only in rare circumstances would an Administrator get to use one. However, she could hitch rides with the Commandant of the Coasties or with CBP...

One of my Dad's friends used to rate a helo when he was with DoD. Alas, he was never so bold as to bring us along to play golf.

Rated a helo, hmmm. They didn't like that person very much did they.;)

mikeef Apr 6, 2016 12:30 pm


Originally Posted by Boggie Dog (Post 26434161)
You could commute.;)

I bet if we took up a collection, we could get enough FTers to sponsor upgrades for all of her weekly round-trips.

Mike

chollie Apr 6, 2016 1:35 pm


Originally Posted by mikeef (Post 26446350)
I bet if we took up a collection, we could get enough FTers to sponsor upgrades for all of her weekly round-trips.

Mike

I'm in. ;)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:13 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.