FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/checkpoints-borders-policy-debate-687/)
-   -   TSA needs to change (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/checkpoints-borders-policy-debate/1703450-tsa-needs-change.html)

danielonn Aug 18, 2015 3:41 am

TSA needs to change
 
I think the TSA needs an overhaul and emulate Israel. If we want to avoid people breaching the security and flying without a proper boarding pass or stowaways there first needs to be vehicle checkpoints before entering the airport terminal zone sort of like an entrance to a parking garage where the door closes behind you upon entering and the exit door only opens after the check. If you are deemed a risk you will be escorted off the property by the TSA.

If you are picking up a passenger you will be asked to verify the name and flight details or if you are a person who is a plane spotter or wants to visit the terminal or escort someone through security you would need to register 72 hours before on the TSA APIS system failure to do so would result in denied access except for outdoor pickups which can only occur up to 40 minutes before and after the scheduled landing time.

Drop offs can occur 4 hours prior the flight up until 90 minutes prior.

Before entering the terminal everyone must show an ID.

Before entering the checkin area passengers will have their checked bags screened by an X-ray or hand bag check along with answering questions.

When you are cleared and deemed low risk by an overall ranking you can take liquids keep shoes on as well as belts and laptops. Higher risk passengers would still follow today's procedures and go to a different secondary screening area away from the general area so as to not slow things down.

Your ranking would be based on past travel history if you have cooperated with the search your current standing whether you have a criminal record or not but it would not be based on religion or other discriminating factors like applying for a credit card.

Arriving passengers may also be subjected to an X-Ray screen if deemed a threat before being allowed into the public area. At baggage claims all bags and bag tags would be matched with your ID.

Customs would also be more secure with an exit booth whereby alll Passports are verified and registered to be sure passengers have no warrants etc.

What are your thoughts? This is my 2 cents. So essentially the TSA Pre Check and Global Entry would be implemented on a day to day basis via the ranking and no fee or application.

FliesWay2Much Aug 18, 2015 5:17 am

I'll Go First...
 

justforfun Aug 18, 2015 5:25 am

Didn't realize it was April 1st already.

petaluma1 Aug 18, 2015 5:30 am

Oy vey!

But on second thought, perhaps such a plan would rid the airports of the TSA - because it would bring air travel to a halt in this country. With no air travel, no need for the TSA.

84fiero Aug 18, 2015 6:16 am


Originally Posted by petaluma1 (Post 25287632)
Oy vey!

But on second thought, perhaps such a plan would rid the airports of the TSA - because it would bring air travel to a halt in this country. With no air travel, no need for the TSA.

My doctor has been advising me to get more exercise, maybe walking ORD-LAX is just what I need!

Often1 Aug 18, 2015 6:18 am

Total rubbish. Not one shred of evidence that the US needs this.

ChangingNappies Aug 18, 2015 6:24 am

So, this all transfers a lot of air travel to the road. The latter having a death toll by passenger*mile higher by many orders of magnitude, all this ends up doing is killing more people.
And the terrorists win..

SimonB77 Aug 18, 2015 6:38 am


Originally Posted by danielonn (Post 25287308)
If you are picking up a passenger you will be asked to verify the name and flight details or if you are a person who is a plane spotter or wants to visit the terminal or escort someone through security you would need to register 72 hours before on the TSA APIS system failure to do so would result in denied access except for outdoor pickups which can only occur up to 40 minutes before and after the scheduled landing time.

HUH?? So you want the security theater to be even scarier, more expensive and overreaching to the outside of airports? I can just imagine the gridlock this would cause at airports like LAX. Traffic would be backed up for miles. Not to mention the thought of TSA taking Starbucks and water bottles out of vehicles. Absolute worst idea I've read on a message board in a long long time.

Airports don't need more security. They need much less, more effective security. At this point not having the TSA is better than what we have now. Proposing more of a circus is just nuts.

DaveBlaine Aug 18, 2015 7:02 am

http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/...2361-ibuf6.jpg

Pup7 Aug 18, 2015 7:42 am

No words. Just....no....words.

Boggie Dog Aug 18, 2015 8:55 am

OP, why do you think steps like this are needed? What has happened that makes doing these things necessary or even reasonable?

chgoeditor Aug 18, 2015 11:32 am


Originally Posted by Boggie Dog (Post 25288486)
OP, why do you think steps like this are needed? What has happened that makes doing these things necessary or even reasonable?

This.

Why in the world? How much do you think this would add to the cost of airline tickets? How would you propose dealing with buses and trains that come directly into airports?

RadioGirl Aug 18, 2015 8:48 pm

Hey, it's a slow day. :cool:

Originally Posted by danielonn (Post 25287308)
I think the TSA needs an overhaul

Yes.

Originally Posted by danielonn (Post 25287308)
and emulate Israel.

No. No, no no no no.

Originally Posted by danielonn (Post 25287308)
If we want to avoid people breaching the security

Are they doing that? Where?

Originally Posted by danielonn (Post 25287308)
and flying without a proper boarding pass

For the most part, the airline checks for a proper boarding pass at the gate. Why does TSA need to get involved.

Originally Posted by danielonn (Post 25287308)
or stowaways

Huh? Recent stories about stowaways were people (stupidly) hiding in wheel wells, not seated in 13B, apart from that odd repeat-offender woman.

Originally Posted by danielonn (Post 25287308)
there first needs to be vehicle checkpoints before entering the airport terminal zone ...

Vehicle checkpoints would ensure that people don't (later) breach the TSA security checkpoint and that they have a "proper boarding pass" (before they've checked in at the airport??) or that they won't stow away? How?

Originally Posted by danielonn (Post 25287308)
If you are deemed a risk you will be escorted off the property by the TSA.

Uh, no, because TSA's idea of "risk" is "anyone intending to fly."

Originally Posted by danielonn (Post 25287308)
If you are picking up a passenger you will be asked to verify the name and flight details

Why?

Originally Posted by danielonn (Post 25287308)
or if you are a person who is a plane spotter or wants to visit the terminal or escort someone through security you would need to register 72 hours before on the TSA APIS system failure to do so would result in denied access except for outdoor pickups which can only occur up to 40 minutes before and after the scheduled landing time.

What magic occurs in the 40 minutes before and after a flight that makes a person safer?

Originally Posted by danielonn (Post 25287308)
Drop offs can occur 4 hours prior the flight up until 90 minutes prior.

What if I've checked out of my hotel and just want to hang at the lounge for 5 hours? What if I'm running late and someone's dropping me off 30 minutes before the flight?

Originally Posted by danielonn (Post 25287308)
Before entering the terminal everyone must show an ID.

So a checkpoint before the checkpoint. What about another checkpoint on the highway before you turn off onto the road to the airport?

Originally Posted by danielonn (Post 25287308)
Before entering the checkin area passengers will have their checked bags screened by an X-ray or hand bag check along with answering questions.

More checkpoints. I guess unemployment is going to fall.

Originally Posted by danielonn (Post 25287308)
When you are cleared and deemed low risk by an overall ranking you can take liquids keep shoes on as well as belts and laptops.

Oh, well, thanks. Who decided I was "low risk"? TSA thinks everyone is a risk.

Originally Posted by danielonn (Post 25287308)
Higher risk passengers would still follow today's procedures and go to a different secondary screening area away from the general area so as to not slow things down.

Wait a minute - higher risk people got escorted "off the property by the TSA" five or six checkpoints ago.

Originally Posted by danielonn (Post 25287308)
Your ranking would be based on past travel history if you have cooperated with the search your current standing whether you have a criminal record or not but it would not be based on religion or other discriminating factors like applying for a credit card.

Frankly, religion and whether you've applied for a credit card are as accurate at determining risk as your past travel history or your willingness to cooperate with the search. Which is to say, not at all.

Originally Posted by danielonn (Post 25287308)
Arriving passengers may also be subjected to an X-Ray screen if deemed a threat before being allowed into the public area.

Deemed a threat by whom. Are you x-raying their bags (the ones you x-rayed 3 (or was it 4) times at the departing airport)? Or x-raying the passengers themselves? Do you have medical training for that?

Originally Posted by danielonn (Post 25287308)
At baggage claims all bags and bag tags would be matched with your ID.

By this point there are so few passengers who have passed the 16 checkpoints and continue to be considered "low risk" that I guess that won't take long.

Originally Posted by danielonn (Post 25287308)
Customs would also be more secure with an exit booth whereby alll Passports are verified and registered to be sure passengers have no warrants etc.

Isn't that what the customs officer does now? So you want a second booth to do the same thing again?

Originally Posted by danielonn (Post 25287308)
What are your thoughts? This is my 2 cents. So essentially the TSA Pre Check and Global Entry would be implemented on a day to day basis via the ranking and no fee or application.

My thoughts: TSA needs to change. But not in the direction of more checks and more discretion in assigning "risk."

Himeno Aug 18, 2015 10:14 pm

Yes, TSA needs to change. Not like OP has suggested.

It needs to be taken apart, most of its staff sacked as incompetent and return airport screening checkpoints to the airports and airlines. TSA, at most, needs to be a small office under either the FAA or DoT that sets the base standards. Those standards should be based on what happens at checkpoints in Japan, Hong Kong, Korea, Singapore and/or Australia (domestic).

WillCAD Aug 19, 2015 3:51 am


Originally Posted by danielonn (Post 25287308)
I think the TSA needs an overhaul and emulate Israel. If we want to avoid people breaching the security and flying without a proper boarding pass or stowaways there first needs to be vehicle checkpoints before entering the airport terminal zone sort of like an entrance to a parking garage where the door closes behind you upon entering and the exit door only opens after the check. If you are deemed a risk you will be escorted off the property by the TSA.

If you are picking up a passenger you will be asked to verify the name and flight details or if you are a person who is a plane spotter or wants to visit the terminal or escort someone through security you would need to register 72 hours before on the TSA APIS system failure to do so would result in denied access except for outdoor pickups which can only occur up to 40 minutes before and after the scheduled landing time.

Drop offs can occur 4 hours prior the flight up until 90 minutes prior.

Before entering the terminal everyone must show an ID.

Before entering the checkin area passengers will have their checked bags screened by an X-ray or hand bag check along with answering questions.

When you are cleared and deemed low risk by an overall ranking you can take liquids keep shoes on as well as belts and laptops. Higher risk passengers would still follow today's procedures and go to a different secondary screening area away from the general area so as to not slow things down.

Your ranking would be based on past travel history if you have cooperated with the search your current standing whether you have a criminal record or not but it would not be based on religion or other discriminating factors like applying for a credit card.

Arriving passengers may also be subjected to an X-Ray screen if deemed a threat before being allowed into the public area. At baggage claims all bags and bag tags would be matched with your ID.

Customs would also be more secure with an exit booth whereby alll Passports are verified and registered to be sure passengers have no warrants etc.

What are your thoughts? This is my 2 cents. So essentially the TSA Pre Check and Global Entry would be implemented on a day to day basis via the ranking and no fee or application.

You forgot to put in the emoticons to show whether you're serious or kidding. :D^:rolleyes:

If you're kidding, this is hilarious, much like the suggestions to implement martial law around all college campuses during sporting events so the kids won't tear the place apart after a big win or big loss.

If you're serious, I have no words for how ridiculous all of these suggestions are. The United States is not Isreal. We're not surrounded on all sides by countries dedicated to our violent destruction, now do we suffer bombings, riots, or mass shootings at our airports on a routine basis. There is no need whatsoever for such draconian, un-Constitutional, horrendously expensive methodology.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:01 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.