Community
Wiki Posts
Search

TSA wants to be armed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 26, 2015, 3:35 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ORD
Programs: status free since 2017
Posts: 2,188
TSA wants to be armed

http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/23/politi...ns-protection/

Hell no! I don't trust these idiots to slice my bagel properly much less handle a gun.

What are they smoking?
carsnoceans is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2015, 9:26 am
  #2  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,878
Its the typical knee jerk reaction as the same thing was said after the shooting of a TSO at LAX and I am 100% against arming TSO's (and for sake of argument, it would be fun to see how many would wash out after failing the background check required for this as it's different than the background check they passed to become a TSO )
goalie is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2015, 9:43 am
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ORD
Programs: status free since 2017
Posts: 2,188
Originally Posted by goalie
Its the typical knee jerk reaction as the same thing was said after the shooting of a TSO at LAX and I am 100% against arming TSO's (and for sake of argument, it would be fun to see how many would wash out after failing the background check required for this as it's different than the background check they passed to become a TSO )
Haha! I didnt think of that.

One of my coworkers commented on TSA by saying - they are a workforce that has jobs after events of 9-11 and otherwise and would have stayed perpetually unemployed.

Should have found a more suitable job for them.
carsnoceans is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2015, 9:52 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: San Antonio, TX
Programs: AA EXP, DL Silver, Global Entry
Posts: 1,863
To be more correct it's the TSA employees' union that's calling for an armed special TSA unit not DHS/TSA. The union obviously claims its interest is to protect its members but wouldn't hurt the union in terms of increased membership, higher waged members, etc. Personally I don't see the need for more Federal police. If DHS/TSA thinks they need to bring armed uniformed police back to security checkpoints then let local authorities supply them.
Randyk47 is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2015, 10:46 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
Originally Posted by goalie
(and for sake of argument, it would be fun to see how many would wash out after failing the background check required for this as it's different than the background check they passed to become a TSO )
Which is kinda my point about how arming TSOs could be a good thing ... pointing out the gap in training would be informative. (I don't want to say "amusing" ... I'm not much into schadenfreude.)

But, yeah, nobody likes that point of view, so back into the penalty box I go ...
jkhuggins is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2015, 11:26 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: San Antonio, TX
Programs: AA EXP, DL Silver, Global Entry
Posts: 1,863
Originally Posted by jkhuggins
Which is kinda my point about how arming TSOs could be a good thing ... pointing out the gap in training would be informative. (I don't want to say "amusing" ... I'm not much into schadenfreude.)

But, yeah, nobody likes that point of view, so back into the penalty box I go ...
Actually I have no problem with your point of view. TSOs are not and were not hired to be armed law enforcement officers. Totally or at least significantly different set of skills. Locally there are a number of what appear to be physically disabled TSOs. Good for them. They got a job they can do despite their disability but probably no way they'd ever pass the physical requirements to be an armed officer. I suppose some would fail for other reasons like a background check. I'd go as far as to say there probably are a number right now who couldn't get enrolled in GE much less become an armed officer.
Randyk47 is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2015, 12:33 pm
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Finally back in Boston after escaping from New York
Posts: 13,644
Oh, great, they've already started implementing policies...

"As part of our managed inconsistencies, we will randomly shoot a passenger every hour. We understand that this cause some inconvenience and appreciate your patience as we do our best to secure the checkpoint. Passengers under the age of 18 and over the age of 75 are excluded. Any passenger with a yellow tag on their carry-on will automatically become that hour's lucky winner..."
Mike
mikeef is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2015, 12:45 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 247
the only time they should be assosiated with weapon is when they are facing it due to treason !
DIFIN is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2015, 1:30 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Retired in Houston, TX
Programs: Platinum-CO-DL-Priority Club WN A-list Diomond-Hilton-BW Gold-Choice Hertz Presidents Club
Posts: 305
I don't think it will happen. Are we to arm Movie Theater Ushers, or School Teachers because of shootings? Let's arm the Homeless too. They get the worst of it.
Houston.Business is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2015, 7:22 pm
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,082
Originally Posted by Houston.Business
I don't think it will happen. Are we to arm Movie Theater Ushers, or School Teachers because of shootings? Let's arm the Homeless too. They get the worst of it.
As you probably know some school districts in Texas have moved to allow some teachers to be armed.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2015, 8:59 pm
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Finally back in Boston after escaping from New York
Posts: 13,644
Originally Posted by Houston.Business
I don't think it will happen. Are we to arm Movie Theater Ushers, or School Teachers because of shootings? Let's arm the Homeless too. They get the worst of it.
As long as we don't give the guns to postal clerks...

Mike
mikeef is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2015, 9:16 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Scotland
Programs: Star Alliance
Posts: 476
Yeah, just what people need, MORE morons with guns
chris19992 is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2015, 11:55 pm
  #13  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ORD
Programs: status free since 2017
Posts: 2,188
I follow BoardingArea on twitter and every few days they will retweet something utterly retarded from @TSA. I wonder if they are doing it as sarcasm? They really can't be supporting them (I hope)! ::eeps::
carsnoceans is offline  
Old Apr 3, 2015, 1:19 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: LAS
Posts: 1,279
Originally Posted by Houston.Business
I don't think it will happen. Are we to arm Movie Theater Ushers, or School Teachers because of shootings? Let's arm the Homeless too. They get the worst of it.
^ I see you trying to use logic. That's not allowed.

There is no call to arm non-government/non-union victims.

There is a call to arm TSA's government/union clerks, but it has nothing to do with safety or security.

Wanna guess why?
ScatterX is offline  
Old Apr 6, 2015, 9:46 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 959
Originally Posted by ScatterX
^ I see you trying to use logic. That's not allowed.

There is no call to arm non-government/non-union victims.

There is a call to arm TSA's government/union clerks, but it has nothing to do with safety or security.

Wanna guess why?
Ooh, ooh, let me guess, please, please! It looks like this:
$
DeafBlonde is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.