Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

Heightened security at U.S airports (and overseas?)

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Heightened security at U.S airports (and overseas?)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 6, 2014, 8:59 am
  #16  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NC
Programs: AAConciergeKey/1MM, DL DM/2 MM, UA Gold,Hilton Diamond, IHG Plat, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 11,967
Has anyone seen jetway gate checks in any airports outside of where they were already? Typically central and South America have them and China-departing flights. Also I've seen them at JNB...has the new threat brought them elsewhere?
SkyTeam777 is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2014, 12:10 pm
  #17  
RJ1
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 622
I saw a breaking news headline this morning that says we will be required to turn on our smartphones (presumably to prove they are indeed smartphones).
RJ1 is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2014, 12:34 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Seattle, Wash. USA
Posts: 1,531
Originally Posted by RJ1
I saw a breaking news headline this morning that says we will be required to turn on our smartphones (presumably to prove they are indeed smartphones).
Heard a similar report on the BBCWS this morning. If they ask you to power up your laptop/pad/gadget at the checkpoint, and it has a dead batt or otherwise won't turn on, it won't be making the flight.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-28185149

Last edited by chucko; Jul 6, 2014 at 2:28 pm Reason: added link to BBC story
chucko is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2014, 12:36 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SEA
Programs: AS MVP, Hhonors Gold, National Executive, Identity Gold, MLife Gold
Posts: 2,687
Originally Posted by RJ1
I saw a breaking news headline this morning that says we will be required to turn on our smartphones (presumably to prove they are indeed smartphones).
If the bomb goes off on a plane or at a checkpoint, doesn't it still have the same impact on the world economy?
OverThereTooMuch is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2014, 1:38 pm
  #20  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bye Delta
Programs: AA EXP, HH Diamond, IHG Plat, Hyatt Plat, Marriott Plat, Nat'l Exec Elite, Avis Presidents Club
Posts: 16,273
Originally Posted by chucko
Heard a similar report on the BBCWS this morning. If they ask you to power up your laptop/pad/gadget at the checkpoint, and it has a dead batt or otherwise won't turn on, it won't be making the flight.
Sheer idiocy, confiscating phones and laptops just because they have a dead battery.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/07/06/us/tsa...html?hpt=hp_t2
javabytes is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2014, 2:05 pm
  #21  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 57,952
Originally Posted by javabytes
Sheer idiocy, confiscating phones and laptops just because they have a dead battery.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/07/06/us/tsa...html?hpt=hp_t2
This scumbag agency appears to be trying to do its Christmas shopping early.

Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson directed the TSA last week to enhance security at overseas airports that have direct flights to the United States. The specifics of the enhanced measures weren't originally released, and it isn't known what other measures the TSA may employ.

Meet the new jackass. Same as the old jackass. At least the last couple of jackasses had complete first names.
Spiff is online now  
Old Jul 6, 2014, 2:09 pm
  #22  
KDS
 
Join Date: May 2011
Programs: Delta Diamond Medallion 1MM, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Gold, National Car Executive Elite
Posts: 550
Originally Posted by Spiff
This scumbag agency appears to be trying to do its Christmas shopping early.

Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson directed the TSA last week to enhance security at overseas airports that have direct flights to the United States. The specifics of the enhanced measures weren't originally released, and it isn't known what other measures the TSA may employ.

Meet the new jackass. Same as the old jackass. At least the last couple of jackasses had complete first names.


I didn't see this thread before I'd posted a related reply in another thread; so I'll "repeat" it here:
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/23152433-post15.html
KDS is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2014, 2:51 pm
  #23  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by javabytes
Sheer idiocy, confiscating phones and laptops just because they have a dead battery.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/07/06/us/tsa...html?hpt=hp_t2
They are trying to roll this out to more airports but it hasn't been implemented for all US-bound flights yet at least.

These DHS/TSA circus characters are so busy obsessing over the trivial that they can't focus on contraband WEI interdiction in an intelligent manner -- instead they come up with another circus show performance which doesn't focus even on screening for explosives. This does focus on electronics which may be used to conceal explosives but don't have any explosives -- this seems a desperate CYA move by DHS/TSA that just goes to show how DHS/TSA is unable to reliably interdict contraband WEIs even when frogmarching its covered airlines, the related contractors and foreign authorities too.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2014, 2:54 pm
  #24  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by OverThereTooMuch
If the bomb goes off on a plane or at a checkpoint, doesn't it still have the same impact on the world economy?
If IEDs start going off in rapid succession at airport screening checkpoints with unnecessarily long lines because of the TSA dog and pony show, then you can bet that would turn off air travel (in some places) way more than a single plane or handful of planes from that airport being attacked by terrorist's bomb(s),
GUWonder is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2014, 3:10 pm
  #25  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,165
Skeletor

Anybody notice they interviewed Chertoff in the CNN story???
FliesWay2Much is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2014, 4:25 pm
  #26  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,129
This is exactly why TSA/directives exist in the first place. To be able to make intelligence based adjustments to evolving threats. And it seems that is exactly what they are doing.

Don't always agree with TSA but glad they are there instead of our gang of anti-government extremists.
jpetekYXMD80 is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2014, 4:29 pm
  #27  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 821
Originally Posted by jpetekYXMD80
This is exactly why TSA/directives exist in the first place. To be able to make intelligence based adjustments to evolving threats. And it seems that is exactly what they are doing.

Don't always agree with TSA but glad they are there instead of our gang of anti-government extremists.
Until these cunning terrorists realize that they just have to ensure their devices that look like tablets or laptops have the capability to look like they're booting up.
saulblum is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2014, 4:29 pm
  #28  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 57,952
Originally Posted by jpetekYXMD80
This is exactly why TSA/directives exist in the first place. To be able to make intelligence based adjustments to evolving threats. And it seems that is exactly what they are doing.

Don't always agree with TSA but glad they are there instead of our gang of anti-government extremists.
TSA scumbag "leaders" employ no intelligence when they issue stupid directives like these.

I hope you're still willing to fly after TSA is kicked out of out airports and its scumbag leaders and many of its employees are sent to prison.
Spiff is online now  
Old Jul 6, 2014, 4:34 pm
  #29  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,129
Originally Posted by Spiff
TSA scumbag "leaders" employ no intelligence when they issue stupid directives like these.

And you know this how? Of course it came from intelligence.


Originally Posted by Spiff

I hope you're still willing to fly after TSA is kicked out of out airports and its scumbag leaders and many of its employees are sent to prison.

I can't say much other than you are one of the most delusional men completely out of touch with reality as i've ever come across. With the conviction you type, it almost sounds like you see that as even a faint possibility. You live in a dream. If you really believe that, make a bet with me on it. 1000:1 odds. Put your money where your mouth is.
jpetekYXMD80 is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2014, 4:35 pm
  #30  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 821
Originally Posted by GUWonder
If IEDs start going off in rapid succession at airport screening checkpoints with unnecessarily long lines because of the TSA dog and pony show, then you can bet that would turn off air travel (in some places) way more than a single plane or handful of planes from that airport being attacked by terrorist's bomb(s),
A series of coordinated suicide bombings at checkpoints at a few major airports nationwide would bring US aviation to its knees. And not one damn thing the TSA does would be able to stop such an attack.
saulblum is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.