Why are stolen passports not detected?
#16
Join Date: Feb 2014
Programs: AA Plat SPG Gold
Posts: 292
Really? If you're from the US, State Department takes loss of passport seriously. I recall that when I reported it to the embassy, they were doing a follow up investigation as to who stole it. I lost mine many many years ago and I still get taken to secondary everytime I land into IAH.
#17
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: AA Gold AAdvantage Elite, Rapids Reward
Posts: 38,313
Something wasn't right. They stolen passports from Thailand. Immigration computer system do not have database access. No one who responsible for this. I am very concerns about those 5 passengers who stolen passports. They didn't put on "No Fly Lists". He could be arrested or deported. Immigration computer system that do not have invalid or stolen. Could be big mistake. It wasn't their fault. No one who blame them against those guys, but they didn't caught the guys. They have keep terrorist off the plane. Do not put him onboard the aircraft unless if the passport is valid. Every time they have to check the passport before boarding the aircraft.
#18
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Really? If you're from the US, State Department takes loss of passport seriously. I recall that when I reported it to the embassy, they were doing a follow up investigation as to who stole it. I lost mine many many years ago and I still get taken to secondary everytime I land into IAH.
State doesn't have the resources to extensively investigate most reported passport thefts. If a pattern is noticed in those or other reports, then there may be increased resource allocation to investigate specific incidents. If there is strong suspicion of the passport having been voluntarily sold or "shared" by the person (or a related party) whose passport is reported lost/stolen and/or otherwise misused, then your kind of outcome becomes more probable than would otherwise be the case.
Last edited by GUWonder; Mar 12, 2014 at 12:09 am
#19
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Paris
Posts: 577
You're an exception then; that and/or the government considers that you may have a history of voluntarily "sharing" your passport and be up to that currently. Most people who have had a reported lost or stolen US passport don't end up taken to secondary inspection everytime they arrive at a US port of entry/CBP clearance facility.
State doesn't have the resources to extensively investigate most reported passport thefts. If a pattern is noticed in those or other reports, then there may be increased resource allocation to investigate specific incidents. If there is strong suspicion of the passport having been voluntarily sold or "shared" by the person (or a related party) whose passport is reported lost/stolen and/or otherwise misused, then your kind of outcome becomes more probable than would otherwise be the case.
State doesn't have the resources to extensively investigate most reported passport thefts. If a pattern is noticed in those or other reports, then there may be increased resource allocation to investigate specific incidents. If there is strong suspicion of the passport having been voluntarily sold or "shared" by the person (or a related party) whose passport is reported lost/stolen and/or otherwise misused, then your kind of outcome becomes more probable than would otherwise be the case.
#21
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
(In)SecureFlight data filings don't require passport data -- a large proportion of domestic passengers don't have currently valid passport data -- and name discrepancies between the filed field data for the above fields and the passport name/data generally comes with no adverse outcomes for the passenger even on international flights out of the US.
Absent the passport number+country in the MRZ coming up as flagged, this stuff also gets missed even by the USG/US CBP when passengers are flying out of the US using doctored stolen docs.
Absent the passport number+country in the MRZ coming up as flagged, this stuff also gets missed even by the USG/US CBP when passengers are flying out of the US using doctored stolen docs.
Early on in the Malaysia Air story, a security expert was on television saying that people fly all the time with documents that conceal their true identity.
#22
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Perhaps other governments share my opinion. Or that they simply aren't interested in checking Interpol's database. Or that they don't think Interpol's database is reliable/accurate. Who knows?
I hope that Interpol is not successful in spreading hysteria about fake/false passports due to this incident, which is looking less and less likely to have any real sinister happenings re: the passengers whose passports were not accurate.
I hope that Interpol is not successful in spreading hysteria about fake/false passports due to this incident, which is looking less and less likely to have any real sinister happenings re: the passengers whose passports were not accurate.
http://rt.com/news/interpol-stolen-p...-database-318/
http://www.interpol.int/Crime-areas/...ting/I-Checkit
The following may be interesting to some but it's not news to me:
http://www.interpol.int/enเธ%20%20เธ.../SLTD-Database
Noble still wants it to be used systematically by airlines, hotels and banks. It would make it easier for his US backers and the closest intelligence sharing allies to expand the international mass surveillance infrastructure, as Edward Snowden's docs show too.
Last edited by GUWonder; Mar 12, 2014 at 6:59 am
#23
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
An ATS score may change due to what the USG files when a passport is reported stolen/lost. If the passport reported has been acknowledged somehow -- automatically or manually -- as misused after the report was taken, then you're more likely to have more issues than others; much the same and worse goes for those suspected of selling/sharing a passport. "No good deed goes unpunished" .... sometimes but not always.
#24
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
You mean which governments almost always physically scan most passengers' passports on exit from the country and/or immigration/customs union/zone? And scan for what?
If you answer those questions, then I likely already know the answer or can get a very good one.
If you answer those questions, then I likely already know the answer or can get a very good one.
#26
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
I mean scan the passport via some machine rather than just look at it. Nobody scans my passport if I travel FCO-LHR and back for example. Then again, when thinking of l/h flights my passport is scanned at LHR and at security in the US, so perhaps it is all l/h flights. Or is it? I can't say I take all that much notice!
The FCO passport control people sometimes scan passports; and sometimes they just look at the cover of my passport and perhaps only flip to a random visa page to place an exit stamp (if even that).
It's uncommon for government authorities to physically scan exiting passengers' passports to do the scan against the Interpol SLTD database.
The US, UK and the UAE account for most of the passport queries against the SLTD database, and the US and UK most frequently don't have physical exit control checks that have the government authorities directly scanning the passport against SLTD databases. The US and UK are mainly relying upon the airlines and/or passenger-supplied data when it comes to checking exiting passengers against SLTD and other databases.
Last edited by GUWonder; Mar 12, 2014 at 7:43 am
#28
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Yes, my passport details are entered on the airline's site. But that doesn't actually show I possess that passport or it has my photo on it.
They don't scan my passport going in or out (UK passport) and half the time they don't even open it.
Interesting. Thanks for the info.
They don't scan my passport going in or out (UK passport) and half the time they don't even open it.
Interesting. Thanks for the info.
We know that what the airline or passenger supplies can be gamed. No skin off my back, as long as contraband WEIs don't get allowed onto my flights -- something that passport checking cannot do.
#29
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,335
Ron Noble (who I've met from when we were both federal prosecutors) says that only about 20 of the 190 or so countries check their airline passenger rosters against the list of known stolen passports maintained by Interpol. Malaysia is not one of them.
#30
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 57,952
How can we get the other 20 to stop wasting time/resources?