![]() |
Land of the paranoid
Hi All
I just wanted to share what happened to my niece. My niece got married to an American at the beginning of October. We are Australians. She was moving to Houston and of course was taking her baby (Chinchilla Cat) with her. They flew from Brisbane into LAX and collected her little fluff ball. Then had to go back through security to catch her flight to Houston. She gets to the screeners and said to them i have never travelled with a animal before. She was screened then had to get her baby and go through the scanner. And now the funny part. Her baby was padded down and swiped for explosives!!! Are you serious!!!! She just paid $2500 to fly her baby to the good old USA why the hell would she blow her baby up! She said the TSA agents were very nice but OMG. Talk about paranoia. |
I'm not suprised that the cat and its carrier were checked for exposure to explosive residue. My daughter's wheelchair is randomly wiped down at checkpoints for explosive residue testing and I certainly don't have any intent of blowing her up. :p
$2500 seems awfully expensive to fly a pet. Did the cat have its own seat assignment? |
Originally Posted by ozcaz
(Post 21873503)
She gets to the screeners and said to them i have never travelled with a animal before. She was screened then had to get her baby and go through the scanner. And now the funny part. Her baby was padded down and swiped for explosives!!! Are you serious!!!! She just paid $2500 to fly her baby to the good old USA why the hell would she blow her baby up!
|
Originally Posted by El Cochinito
(Post 21873630)
Did the cat have its own seat assignment?
|
Originally Posted by El Cochinito
(Post 21873630)
$2500 seems awfully expensive to fly a pet. Did the cat have its own seat assignment? |
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
(Post 21873649)
If a terrorist could spend $2500 to slip a bomb past TSA they would be happy to.
|
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
(Post 21873649)
If a terrorist could spend $2500 to slip a bomb past TSA they would be happy to.
|
A cat is not a bomb. |
Originally Posted by FredAnderssen
(Post 21874774)
A cat is not a bomb. A dead cat COULD be used as a bomb.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-23250977 I'm not sure enough explosives could be placed in a live cat to present a real threat to an aircraft, though. It'd likely just look a lot like the cat scene in "The Boondock Saints." |
Originally Posted by VelvetJones
(Post 21874219)
And Loren just proved that America is broken. Tell us Loren, how many "terrorist" have the TSA thwarted?
I do agree that the cat isn't a bomb but the fact she spent that money to bring it isn't evidence of that. |
Originally Posted by Caradoc
(Post 21875507)
So could a live one. Live animals have been used to smuggle drugs, for example.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-23250977 I'm not sure enough explosives could be placed in a live cat to present a real threat to an aircraft, though. It'd likely just look a lot like the cat scene in "The Boondock Saints." |
Land of the paranoid
I challenge any TSA clerk out there to try to pat down my 13 year old female tabby.
|
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
(Post 21876260)
A pregnant cat can deliver a pound of kittens. Thus a cat can hold a pound inside it. A pound of HE can bring down a plane if it's placed right.
|
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
(Post 21876260)
A pound of HE can bring down a plane if it's placed right.
After all, there was the guy with the pound of HE in his rectum that didn't manage to kill the guy he was standing right next to... Abdullah Hassan al-Asiri. The body seems to damp the effects rather well. |
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog
(Post 21877181)
So any person could be the carrier of a plane killing butt bomb.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 4:09 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.