Pre-Check - denied more often than not
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: RDU, Gate C1
Programs: DL Diamond, HHonors Diamond, AA, UA, WN, E+ Gold
Posts: 261
Pre-Check - denied more often than not
Am I the only one this happens to?
I was approved for pre-check at least 14-16 months ago. ONly problem is for the last 1+ year, I seldom came in contact with it so usually couldn't take advantage of it. Now that it's showing up more in more places (including now RDU my home airport), I should be breezing through all the time. But in fact, it's exactly the opposite. I go thru the express lane to TSA, but then get diverted over to the barefoot line.
I've asked TSA about it and they always tell me it's random and a number of factors can affect approval or denial. But since February I'm batting zero and that's BS. Did i somehow get myself kicked out of pre-check?
I was approved for pre-check at least 14-16 months ago. ONly problem is for the last 1+ year, I seldom came in contact with it so usually couldn't take advantage of it. Now that it's showing up more in more places (including now RDU my home airport), I should be breezing through all the time. But in fact, it's exactly the opposite. I go thru the express lane to TSA, but then get diverted over to the barefoot line.
I've asked TSA about it and they always tell me it's random and a number of factors can affect approval or denial. But since February I'm batting zero and that's BS. Did i somehow get myself kicked out of pre-check?
#2
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Land of ORD
Programs: AA Plat UA Premier
Posts: 9,154
When I was downgraded to Platinum on AA I didn't get Pre-Check for a whole month. The last two trips I was Pre-Check again
Yeah it's weird.
Also a co-worker told me that if you change your reservation within two weeks of the flight you are denied Pre-Check. Has this been anyone else's experience?
Yeah it's weird.
Also a co-worker told me that if you change your reservation within two weeks of the flight you are denied Pre-Check. Has this been anyone else's experience?
#4
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: RDU, Gate C1
Programs: DL Diamond, HHonors Diamond, AA, UA, WN, E+ Gold
Posts: 261
I don't typically change a reservation in advance of my travel dates, but I often change my reservation on the day of travel via SDC on DL. But so does every other Platinum, Diamond, etc, and that doesn't seem to have an adverse affect on their pre-check success.
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Denver • DEN-APA
Programs: AF Platinum, EK Gold, AA EXP, UA 1K, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 21,598
The only problem I have with Pre-Check are the non-TTs that clog up the line and the TSA agents that don't kick them out of the line and send them back to the regular line.
#6
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,444
Bubbaloop, in a rebellious mood.
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Denver • DEN-APA
Programs: AF Platinum, EK Gold, AA EXP, UA 1K, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 21,598
More like an a$$, and even more reason to screen the line before it gets to the checker. TSA should NOT permit non-PreCheck pax to jump the queue. They should be kicking them out of the line and sending them on the walk of shame back to the regular kettle line. Start doing that and it will cure the problem.
Last edited by SFO777; Apr 9, 2013 at 6:07 am
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: jfk area
Programs: AA platinum; 2MM AA, Delta Diamond, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 10,291
Am I the only one this happens to?
I was approved for pre-check at least 14-16 months ago. ONly problem is for the last 1+ year, I seldom came in contact with it so usually couldn't take advantage of it. Now that it's showing up more in more places (including now RDU my home airport), I should be breezing through all the time. But in fact, it's exactly the opposite. I go thru the express lane to TSA, but then get diverted over to the barefoot line.
I've asked TSA about it and they always tell me it's random and a number of factors can affect approval or denial. But since February I'm batting zero and that's BS. Did i somehow get myself kicked out of pre-check?
I was approved for pre-check at least 14-16 months ago. ONly problem is for the last 1+ year, I seldom came in contact with it so usually couldn't take advantage of it. Now that it's showing up more in more places (including now RDU my home airport), I should be breezing through all the time. But in fact, it's exactly the opposite. I go thru the express lane to TSA, but then get diverted over to the barefoot line.
I've asked TSA about it and they always tell me it's random and a number of factors can affect approval or denial. But since February I'm batting zero and that's BS. Did i somehow get myself kicked out of pre-check?
#9
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: RDU, Gate C1
Programs: DL Diamond, HHonors Diamond, AA, UA, WN, E+ Gold
Posts: 261
No, GE I am not. But I was approved at the pre-check checK point this norning at msp and wss ablle to proceed thru thankfully. My averages still aren't that great, but I'll take what I can get.
#10
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SYD (perenially), GVA (not in a long time)
Programs: QF PS, EK-Gold, Security Theatre Critic
Posts: 6,781
More like an a$$, and even more reason to screen the line before it gets to the checker. TSA should NOT permit non-PreCheck pax to jump the queue. They should be kicking them out of the line and sending them on the walk of shame back to the regular kettle line. Start doing that and it will cure the problem.
This is one of the (numerous) perception problems created by Pre-Check; that those who are not PreCheck eligible are "kettles." BubbaLoop may very well be a far more frequent flyer than many US citizens who qualify for Pre-Check through their FF program, but as a non-US citizen she is not eligible.
Those people you call "kettles" standing in the "regular line" clutching their Freedom Baggies and with shoes off, waiting to be groped by a representative of the United States Government, may well be influential business owners, acclaimed academics, important scientific researchers, professional musicians or artists, world-class medical doctors, or entrepreneurs - any of whom could bring significant economic, practical or intellectual benefit to the US if they chose to do business or practice their profession there - but they're treated like garbage by the TSA (and by the people in the Pre-Check line) simply because they're not US citizens.
There was a time when the US proclaimed to the rest of the world: "Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, ... with the understanding that the "huddled masses" would, in time, become productive members of society. Today the message is "Line up the furriners over there to be treated like criminals, regardless of what value they may be willing to bring to the country."
Last edited by RadioGirl; Apr 9, 2013 at 7:52 am
#11
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 821
Unless you can show me the data that supports the notion that a passenger who flies 100,000 miles per year is less likely to be harboring a bomb in his or her shoes or laptop or jacket than a passenger who flies 15,000 miles a year and has done so uneventfully for the past decade.
#12
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SYD (perenially), GVA (not in a long time)
Programs: QF PS, EK-Gold, Security Theatre Critic
Posts: 6,781
The most egregious misconception is that PreCheck is about security.
Unless you can show me the data that supports the notion that a passenger who flies 100,000 miles per year is less likely to be harboring a bomb in his or her shoes or laptop or jacket than a passenger who flies 15,000 miles a year and has done so uneventfully for the past decade.
Unless you can show me the data that supports the notion that a passenger who flies 100,000 miles per year is less likely to be harboring a bomb in his or her shoes or laptop or jacket than a passenger who flies 15,000 miles a year and has done so uneventfully for the past decade.
But I'm attacking the (equally ludicrous) notion that a non-US citizen who flies 100,000 miles/year is statistically MORE likely to be harboring a bomb in his or her shoes or laptop or jacket than a US citizen who joined a FF program last week.
#13
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SEA/YVR/BLI
Programs: UA "Lifetime" Gold, AS MVPG100K, OW Emerald, HH Lifetime Diamond, IC Plat, Marriott Gold, Hertz Gold
Posts: 9,489
The most egregious misconception is that PreCheck is about security.
Unless you can show me the data that supports the notion that a passenger who flies 100,000 miles per year is less likely to be harboring a bomb in his or her shoes or laptop or jacket than a passenger who flies 15,000 miles a year and has done so uneventfully for the past decade.
Unless you can show me the data that supports the notion that a passenger who flies 100,000 miles per year is less likely to be harboring a bomb in his or her shoes or laptop or jacket than a passenger who flies 15,000 miles a year and has done so uneventfully for the past decade.
Well, yeah, that's the main one.
But I'm attacking the (equally ludicrous) notion that a non-US citizen who flies 100,000 miles/year is statistically MORE likely to be harboring a bomb in his or her shoes or laptop or jacket than a US citizen who joined a FF program last week.
But I'm attacking the (equally ludicrous) notion that a non-US citizen who flies 100,000 miles/year is statistically MORE likely to be harboring a bomb in his or her shoes or laptop or jacket than a US citizen who joined a FF program last week.
Am I cynical to believe the main purpose of TSA Pre✓™ is to divide and con, i.e. to buy off the frequent flyers who will otherwise be complaining repeatedly (and occasionally even effectively) about TSA procedures?
If we're to take everything done by the TSA seriously, doesn't this open up another opportunity for terrorists to coerce or bribe someone in this category to carry something through the check point, just as certain exemptions for airline crew, the very old, and the very young have?
My rhetorical questions have been asked and answered repeatedly here and elsewhere. In other words, it's just one more bit of security theater, coupled with damage control.
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Denver • DEN-APA
Programs: AF Platinum, EK Gold, AA EXP, UA 1K, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 21,598
Those people you call "kettles" standing in the "regular line" clutching their Freedom Baggies and with shoes off, waiting to be groped by a representative of the United States Government, may well be influential business owners, acclaimed academics, important scientific researchers, professional musicians or artists, world-class medical doctors, or entrepreneurs - any of whom could bring significant economic, practical or intellectual benefit to the US if they chose to do business or practice their profession there - but they're treated like garbage by the TSA (and by the people in the Pre-Check line) simply because they're not US citizens.
As for supposedly being treated like garbage, my non Pre-Check TSA experience is, I suspect, far more extensive than yours, or most FTers here. I have never once been treated like garbage by any TSA. Then again, I don't cop an attitude.
There was a time when the US proclaimed to the rest of the world: "Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, ... with the understanding that the "huddled masses" would, in time, become productive members of society. Today the message is "Line up the furriners over there to be treated like criminals, regardless of what value they may be willing to bring to the country."
As for US immigration policies, once upon a time your characterization was true. And once upon a time, the US was not a socialist, entitlement country with an embarrassing government. IMO, considering the current direction of this (once great) country, not sure why anyone would want to come here anyway, unless they were looking for a handout, apparently like BubbaLoop.
Last edited by SFO777; Apr 9, 2013 at 10:35 am
#15
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 821
Passengers receiving a quicker and less burdensome screening are being told by a government agency that they are more trustworthy because of the amount of money they have spent with a private company.
Huge difference.
The passenger who flies coach three times a year is paying the same 9/11 security fee in his fare as the passenger who pays $1,000 for his first-class transcontinental flight once a month.
Why should the latter be assumed to be less of a risk than the former? Where is the data that shows that the former is more likely to be hiding a bomb in his shoes than the latter? I mean, PreCheck is "risk-based security," so surely there has to be data showing that 100,000-mile-per-year road warriors are less of a risk than the woman who flies twice a year at the holidays to visit her parents and has been doing so for the past ten years.
Right?
Should drivers who buy a new luxury sports car every year be entitled to a higher speed limit, with their own special lanes? Should road warriors who drive 100,000 miles a year be entitled to their own special fast lane?