FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/checkpoints-borders-policy-debate-687/)
-   -   US Senator Gets Resolution Patdown (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/checkpoints-borders-policy-debate/1447043-us-senator-gets-resolution-patdown.html)

GUWonder Mar 13, 2013 12:43 am


Originally Posted by SeriouslyLost (Post 20408337)
I've always worked on the assumption that the aides that churn out the letters pool their responses and simply cut and paste to the sender. That's why the letter can be stock. And ignore the actual content and questions sent to them.

The "aides" being mostly unpaid interns cutting and pasting from and/or into template text where the key content has likely been cleared by a person on government payroll of some sort. While the intent of the probable intern is probably not to ignore constituent letter's content and actual questions, the perceived outcome by the constituent may well seem the same in any era of questionable educational achievements and "hiring" practices.

javabytes Mar 15, 2013 12:53 am

Every congresscritter should be subject to an RPD every time they fly. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

SeriouslyLost Mar 15, 2013 8:28 pm


Originally Posted by javabytes (Post 20422644)
Every congresscritter should be subject to an RPD every time they fly. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

Your use of the word "goose" is appropriate there. On several levels. Well done!

chollie Mar 16, 2013 6:12 pm


Originally Posted by SeriouslyLost (Post 20427858)
Your use of the word "goose" is appropriate there. On several levels. Well done!

Sen. McCaskill would probably throw a hissy fit if someone told her that everytime she's in the scanner, the peep room viewer tells his fellow TSOs 'Take a gander at her'. :p

Global_Hi_Flyer Mar 17, 2013 12:57 pm


Originally Posted by GUWonder (Post 20405117)
Her office's constituent response letter claims that the TSA saves the strip search images of passengers when there is an incident. This runs contrary to the TSA propaganda at least in part.

I believe I've been saying that they would save them for that kind of purpose since the first time TSA stated they wouldn't save images. They have all the reason to save the images as they will want "proof".

GUWonder Mar 17, 2013 3:18 pm


Originally Posted by Global_Hi_Flyer (Post 20435846)
I believe I've been saying that they would save them for that kind of purpose since the first time TSA stated they wouldn't save images. They have all the reason to save the images as they will want "proof".

You have been saying that over the years, and the constituent response letter seems to validate the concern that the TSA is deceiving the public about how it approaches the images of electronically strip searched passengers in its possession.

I have been thinking much the same as you on this matter of strip searched passenger images.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:26 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.