Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

Blogger Bob answers question "do TSO's have to identify themselves"

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Blogger Bob answers question "do TSO's have to identify themselves"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 6, 2012, 6:14 pm
  #16  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,685
TSA may not require first and last name be given or displayed, but do individual airports mandate that SIDA credentials be visible at all times?

Heck, if you're issued a sporting venue credential, the first thing most say on the back is, "must be visible at all times."
Ysitincoach is offline  
Old Dec 7, 2012, 5:27 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 150
Originally Posted by N965VJ
Apologies in advance to Mike for the crosspost but ,


§ 1520.5 Sensitive security information.
(11) Identifying information of certain transportation security personnel. (i) Lists of the names or other identifying information that identify persons as—

(A) Having unescorted access to a secure area of an airport, a rail secure area, or a secure or restricted area of a maritime facility, port area, or vessel;

(B) Holding a position as a security screener employed by or under contract with the Federal government pursuant to aviation or maritime transportation security requirements of Federal law, where such lists are aggregated by airport;

(C) Holding a position with the Coast Guard responsible for conducting vulnerability assessments, security boardings, or engaged in operations to enforce maritime security requirements or conduct force protection;

(D) Holding a position as a Federal Air Marshal; or

(ii) The name or other identifying information that identifies a person as a current, former, or applicant for Federal Flight Deck Officer.


So this is a SSI violation then?
§ 1520.17 Consequences of unauthorized disclosure of SSI.

Violation of this part is grounds for a civil penalty and other enforcement or corrective action by DHS, and appropriate personnel actions for Federal employees. Corrective action may include issuance of an order requiring retrieval of SSI to remedy unauthorized disclosure or an order to cease future unauthorized disclosure.
Chaos.Defined is offline  
Old Dec 7, 2012, 8:07 am
  #18  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,165
Originally Posted by Chaos.Defined
§ 1520.5 Sensitive security information.
(11) Identifying information of certain transportation security personnel. (i) Lists of the names or other identifying information that identify persons as—

(A) Having unescorted access to a secure area of an airport, a rail secure area, or a secure or restricted area of a maritime facility, port area, or vessel;

(B) Holding a position as a security screener employed by or under contract with the Federal government pursuant to aviation or maritime transportation security requirements of Federal law, where such lists are aggregated by airport;

(C) Holding a position with the Coast Guard responsible for conducting vulnerability assessments, security boardings, or engaged in operations to enforce maritime security requirements or conduct force protection;

(D) Holding a position as a Federal Air Marshal; or

(ii) The name or other identifying information that identifies a person as a current, former, or applicant for Federal Flight Deck Officer.


So this is a SSI violation then?
§ 1520.17 Consequences of unauthorized disclosure of SSI.

Violation of this part is grounds for a civil penalty and other enforcement or corrective action by DHS, and appropriate personnel actions for Federal employees. Corrective action may include issuance of an order requiring retrieval of SSI to remedy unauthorized disclosure or an order to cease future unauthorized disclosure.
No, because requirements for "safeguarding" SSI apply only to "covered persons" of which passengers are not (unless the passenger happens to be a DHS employee). There's absolutely nothing they can do except for checkpoint harassment or personal lawsuits.
FliesWay2Much is offline  
Old Dec 7, 2012, 1:46 pm
  #19  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Marriott or Hilton hot tub with a big drink <glub> Beverage: To-Go Bag™ DYKWIA: SSSS /rolleyes ☈ Date Night: Costco
Programs: Sea Shell Lounge Platinum, TSA Pre✓ Refusnik Diamond, PWP Gold, FT subset of the subset
Posts: 12,509
Originally Posted by Chaos.Defined
Originally Posted by N965VJ
Apologies in advance to Mike for the crosspost but ,

So this is a SSI violation then?
Just to clarify, the Mike I was referring to is at TravelUnderground.org, not any of the TSA employees named in the PR fluff that were handed awards at a Marriott Resort event.
N965VJ is offline  
Old Dec 8, 2012, 11:20 am
  #20  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,388
Originally Posted by Tom M.
[I]Our officers have a right to privacy, and TSA has the responsibility of protecting our officers from the harassment that could result from revealing their full names.
And apparently passengers don't.

"STATE YOUR NAME"
Global_Hi_Flyer is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2012, 7:26 am
  #21  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards. Tha... that's about it.
Posts: 4,332
This whole identity mess is another morass created by an agency that seems above any sort of oversight or accountability, either from the public they're supposed to be protecting, or the Congress they're supposed to be accountable to.

I certainly understand the concept of protecting a person in a public service job from being harassed; my dad is a career cop, and early in his career he learned the hard way that cops need unlisted phone numbers or scumbags they arrest can look up your number in the phone book and make harassing calls at all hours of the day and night.

However, the idea of a uniformed, badged government workforce, with the power to deny people their Constitutional rights, whose identities are considered secret, is horribly frightening. We aren't supposed to have secret police, secret laws, or secret courts in this country; the mere existence of such secret government is antithetical to the concepts of freedom and democracy upon which this country was founded.

TSOs have badges and name tags; they should all have a unique badge number or employee number, and should be required by law - not just by TSA regs, but by federal law - to both display that identifying information and to provide it to anyone who asks, as ALL times when on duty.

Likewise, non-uniformed TSA personnel such as TSMs and AFSDs should also be subject to this requirement. Anyone in the TSA command structure who has any decision-making ability when it comes to traverlers, luggage, cargo, or sterile area access should be held to this standard.

Beyond that, I have noticed that it's darn difficult to find out who the FSD is at any particular airport. TSA doesn't publish contact information for any of them, nor does it maintain any sort of list of their positions; the best you can do is to find press releases when someone is appointed FSD, but just because someone may have been appointed FSD at a particular airport 2 years ago doesn't mean they're still FSD, and there seems to be a lot of turnover in that job, with few people lasting more than 2-3 years. Local contact information for each airport's FSD's offices, and a list of all current FSDs and AFSDs should be kept up to date on the TSA web site.

But, that will never happen. Never. TSA is, as we all know, completely beyond any sort of transparency or accountability.

I'm just venting my frustration. I've said these things many times before, as have lots of others on FT. It just twist my knickers really tight whenever I think about it.
WillCAD is offline  
Old Dec 9, 2012, 5:20 pm
  #22  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Programs: United
Posts: 2,710
Originally Posted by WillCAD
We aren't supposed to have secret police, secret laws, or secret courts in this country; the mere existence of such secret government is antithetical to the concepts of freedom and democracy upon which this country was founded.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign...rveillance_Act
Combat Medic is offline  
Old Dec 10, 2012, 4:06 am
  #23  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards. Tha... that's about it.
Posts: 4,332
Originally Posted by Combat Medic
Yeah, I've known about the FISA for some time and I'm of the opinion that it's also very un-Constitutional.

In my opinion, any part of the government being kept secret, especially courts or law enforcement, denies the People the rights of due process and redress of grievances, and secret courts deny the right to a speedy and public trial and the right to confront one's accuser in open court.
WillCAD is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.