TSA puts controversial scanners in storage
Nov 15, 2012, 3:04 pm
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 595
Nov 15, 2012, 3:32 pm
#3
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 8,956
So it was the privacy concern that pushed the backscatter machines into the warehouse, not the radiation concern. But yet many TSOs are more than happy to inform passengers that the MMW machines are not the backscatter radiation ones, so no concerns. 
$14 million worth of backscatter machines are now in storage, but the TSA spent $40 million for backscatters. Where is the delta? Still in the field or written off?
Also note, "Sanders couldn’t say how soon the software would be updated for the warehoused scanners." That means an intent still exists to use these machines in the field if the stick software can be made to work.
$14 million worth of backscatter machines are now in storage, but the TSA spent $40 million for backscatters. Where is the delta? Still in the field or written off?
Also note, "Sanders couldn’t say how soon the software would be updated for the warehoused scanners." That means an intent still exists to use these machines in the field if the stick software can be made to work.
Nov 15, 2012, 5:25 pm
#4
Join Date: Oct 2011
Programs: Ham Sandwich Medallion
Posts: 889
I think the biggest joke is the claim of an "80-second patdown". I've never had a patdown waste less than three minutes of my life, including the time spent waiting for the one-striper to finish his donut and come grab your nuts. Typically, it's at least a five-minute deal for me. I can speed it up somewhat by intentionally blocking the line and refusing to put my belongings through until I'm able to join them on the other side, but not by much. Besides, doing that prompts an even harder nut-shot.
Nov 15, 2012, 5:29 pm
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The best state in the USA - Florida!
Programs: Marriott Titanium/LT Plat, AS MVP75K, AA PlatPro, UA Premier, Disney AP
Posts: 14,497
So it was the privacy concern that pushed the backscatter machines into the warehouse, not the radiation concern. But yet many TSOs are more than happy to inform passengers that the MMW machines are not the backscatter radiation ones, so no concerns.
$14 million worth of backscatter machines are now in storage, but the TSA spent $40 million for backscatters. Where is the delta? Still in the field or written off?
Also note, "Sanders couldn’t say how soon the software would be updated for the warehoused scanners." That means an intent still exists to use these machines in the field if the stick software can be made to work.
$14 million worth of backscatter machines are now in storage, but the TSA spent $40 million for backscatters. Where is the delta? Still in the field or written off?
Also note, "Sanders couldn’t say how soon the software would be updated for the warehoused scanners." That means an intent still exists to use these machines in the field if the stick software can be made to work.
Nov 15, 2012, 5:43 pm
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,410
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/201...udulent-tests/
Nov 15, 2012, 5:43 pm
#7
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 219
No, this is the funniest line:
Except the 'full-body scanner' would NOT have found the underwear bomb, and it wasn't 'discovered', either.
Do they think we're that stupid?
Full-body scanners are used to find non-metallic items, such as the underwear bomb discovered on Christmas 2009.
Do they think we're that stupid?
Nov 15, 2012, 7:33 pm
#10
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Programs: WN Nothing and spending the half million points from too many flights, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 8,043
They were at BDL a month ago as well.
Privacy is the excuse. Safety is the reason. They can not say that. (My humble opinion.)
Never works for me.
Welcome to FlyerTalk mrstraveler. Nice first post.
Privacy is the excuse. Safety is the reason. They can not say that. (My humble opinion.)
Sanders couldn’t say how soon the software would be updated for the warehoused scanners.
Welcome to FlyerTalk mrstraveler. Nice first post.
Nov 15, 2012, 8:45 pm
#11
Join Date: May 2008
Location: CT
Programs: AA EXP, UA Plat, Marriott Ambassador, Hyatt Diamond, National Executive Elite
Posts: 340
The backscatter machines were pulled three weeks ago from New York's LaGuardia and JFK, Chicago O'Hare, Los Angeles, Boston, Charlotte and Orlando airports. The move was designed to speed up security lines at checkpoints there.
Sanders said it's worked and that lines at those airports are now moving 180,000 more passengers each day.
Sanders said it's worked and that lines at those airports are now moving 180,000 more passengers each day.
What did those 180,000 people do? Wait in line until it closed/they missed their flight, then try again another day? Decide not to fly?
Nov 15, 2012, 9:29 pm
#13
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Land of ORD
Programs: AA Plat UA Premier
Posts: 9,154
Maker of Airport Body Scanners Suspected of Falsifying Software Tests
Rapiscan has a contract to produce 500 machines for the TSA at a cost of about $180,000 each. The company could be fined and barred from participating in government contracts, or employees could face prison terms if it is found to have defrauded the government.
It’s not the first time Rapiscan has been at the center of testing problems with the machines. The company previously had problems with a “calculation error” in safety tests that showed the machines were emitting radiation levels that were 10 times higher than expected.
It’s not the first time Rapiscan has been at the center of testing problems with the machines. The company previously had problems with a “calculation error” in safety tests that showed the machines were emitting radiation levels that were 10 times higher than expected.
Nov 15, 2012, 10:02 pm
#14
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,676
Fewer full body gropes after the BSX and there are folks who opt-out of the BSX who do not opt-out of MMW (although there are so few who voluntarily opt-out that it isn't really a factor in overall time).
The business about 180k more people per day was hogwash. Maybe he was trying to say that they are capable, based on time saved, of processing that many more people a day, but as it stands, there's no way his statement makes any sense at all.
Nov 15, 2012, 10:04 pm
#15
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,676
Plenty of people shuffle into the NoS wearing socks, too...and the NoS won't catch anything attached to the soles of the feet, like those famous ceramic knives (that could take down a plane how?) or, for that matter, razor blades or molded nastiness...