![]() |
EMTs Frisked Before Treating Pax?
It seemed odd today to witness FA's, who called Narita paramedics for a man in cardiac distress, frisk both EMTs in the jetway before they were allowed to rush aboard. I thought EMT's operating at airports already had full clearance.
Elapsed time between the crew (DL 296) call and the techs arriving was roughly 21 minutes. |
As sad as this sounds, if they arrived via the tarmac, I can see the jetway/airplane being one "zone", and the tarmac being another "zone" ("sterile" vs. "safe"?). Then again, given the tools and instruments that is part of their job... huh!
At DTW, I've seen the fire/safety (in full gear, coats and boxes) in the terminal, presumably to respond to a pax issue in the terminal. I couldn't imagine that they wouldn't have something such as a SIDA badge, so they can cross in/out as required. If we're worried about fire/safety passing something to pax, we have bigger fish to fry. |
Originally Posted by sbagdon
(Post 18851151)
As sad as this sounds, if they arrived via the tarmac, I can see the jetway/airplane being one "zone", and the tarmac being another "zone" ("sterile" vs. "safe"?). Then again, given the tools and instruments that is part of their job... huh!
At DTW, I've seen the fire/safety (in full gear, coats and boxes) in the terminal, presumably to respond to a pax issue in the terminal. I couldn't imagine that they wouldn't have something such as a SIDA badge, so they can cross in/out as required. If we're worried about fire/safety passing something to pax, we have bigger fish to fry. |
If the outbound 296, it is headed for the US and must therefor abide by TSA rules on liquids.
There had been previous reported incedents of EMT's bringing on board substantially more than 6 ounces of saline solution. So now they are restricted to 6 ounces (for each EMT). Stay tuned for next week's episode of "Security Theater", brought to you by your friendly TSA management. We will be discussing the latest IED made from Woodord Reserve amd how this will effect PDB service. [Yes, I know this is NRT and one can not blaim the TSA, but we do seam to the world leader in this insanity] |
Originally Posted by Syrgul
(Post 18851259)
At DTW I've also seen Police Officers, with sidearm mind you, just walk in through the exit and TSA doesn't even bat an eye.
|
Thread Alert
The new home for this discussion is the Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate forum, as this really has nothing to do with Delta Air Lines or the SkyMiles frequent flier loyalty program.
Regards, Canarsie Co-Moderator, Delta SkyMiles forum |
Here in the USSA, everybody is a terrorist until proven innocent. That is, except low IQ thieves and perverts hired from pizza boxes.
|
Originally Posted by Canarsie
(Post 18854327)
The new home for this discussion is the Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate forum, as this really has nothing to do with Delta Air Lines or the SkyMiles frequent flier loyalty program.
Regards, Canarsie Co-Moderator, Delta SkyMiles forum Apologies. |
The TSA requires that any employee entering an aircraft bound for the US be frisked before entering (this is one reason that there are contract security agents standing at the Jetway entrance.)
That said, I have two thoughts: 1. It would be a complicated by potentially useful way to stage an attack. Have someone feign a serious medical condition, then have fake EMTs come on board. 2. Why don't these people have "trusted vendor" IDs that would let them aboard without further formalities? 3. The TSA is clearly unfamiliar with the "golden hour." How much myocardium died while waiting for the EMTs to be searched?? "We're just keeping you safe... by watching you die." |
Originally Posted by LegalTender
(Post 18854734)
Should have guessed that "Checkpoints and Border Policy" is the logical forum to discuss Delta personnel declaring a medical emergency at a major DL station and the on-board response.
Apologies. The purpose of the move of this discussion was meant to be helpful, not punitive — and there is a re-direct in place in the Delta SkyMiles forum which will last for a month. |
Your story doesn't hold water. EMT would have been at the gate prior. That's number one. Number 2) flight attendants don't frisk....ANYONE. We get "frisked" coming through security and we have access to the cockpit :rolleyes:. 3) Many lives are saved by flight attendants in air with CPR and defibrillation. Not to mention we page for medical and have a direct patch to a Doctor on the ground should medical volunteers not be present. Aircraft are equipped with a vast array of medicines as well as IV's and other vital equipment for use in flight.
You know what they say about assuming.
Originally Posted by LegalTender
(Post 18850231)
It seemed odd today to witness FA's, who called Narita paramedics for a man in cardiac distress, frisk both EMTs in the jetway before they were allowed to rush aboard. I thought EMT's operating at airports already had full clearance.
Elapsed time between the crew (DL 296) call and the techs arriving was roughly 21 minutes. |
Originally Posted by DontCallMeShirley
(Post 18943182)
Your story doesn't hold water. EMT would have been at the gate prior. That's number one. ...
You know what they say about assuming. |
Originally Posted by DontCallMeShirley
(Post 18943182)
Your story doesn't hold water. EMT would have been at the gate prior. That's number one. Number 2) flight attendants don't frisk....ANYONE. We get "frisked" coming through security and we have access to the cockpit :rolleyes:. 3) Many lives are saved by flight attendants in air with CPR and defibrillation. Not to mention we page for medical and have a direct patch to a Doctor on the ground should medical volunteers not be present. Aircraft are equipped with a vast array of medicines as well as IV's and other vital equipment for use in flight.
You know what they say about assuming. Yes some large airports do have EMT's and Paramedics on duty, but they usually have other duties too. But if they don't have them they call 911 and know exactly when we arrive and who was sent by 911. Here it could be Green Bay, Ashwaubenon, or Depere so it would be very unlikely someone just showing up and being in the right Rescue Squad. We also do yearly exercises with the Airport to coordinate responses and work out any problems before they can happen. |
I thought basically all airports with air carrier services had to have ARFF (aircraft rescue and firefighting) on site as part of their Part 139 certification. Maybe EMTs and not paramedics, but I'd think they would have EMS available with airport IDs.
|
I've been called to the airport a number of times. For the most part to avoid TSA we drive on the tarmac to the jetway with a police or fire escort. Which we bypass TSA since they cause more harm then good.
TSA leaves us alone now, but 2 years was a different story. http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/15900230-post31.html |
Originally Posted by exwannabe
(Post 18851610)
So now they are restricted to 6 ounces (for each EMT).
|
Yeah, it's a real pain to do a rapid infusion of a liter of saline using TEN 100 mL vials from a plastic bag :) Maybe we can work around it by having the TSA wave magic test strips over the IV bags.
On the other hand, we now have free portable x-ray from the backscatter machines. |
Originally Posted by Mats
(Post 18946343)
Yeah, it's a real pain to do a rapid infusion of a liter of saline using TEN 100 mL vials from a plastic bag :) Maybe we can work around it by having the TSA wave magic test strips over the IV bags.
On the other hand, we now have free portable x-ray from the backscatter machines. |
Originally Posted by fordan
(Post 18944162)
I thought basically all airports with air carrier services had to have ARFF (aircraft rescue and firefighting) on site as part of their Part 139 certification. Maybe EMTs and not paramedics, but I'd think they would have EMS available with airport IDs.
|
Originally Posted by Mats
(Post 18946343)
Yeah, it's a real pain to do a rapid infusion of a liter of saline using TEN 100 mL vials from a plastic bag :) Maybe we can work around it by having the TSA wave magic test strips over the IV bags.
On the other hand, we now have free portable x-ray from the backscatter machines. |
EWR-LGA-JFK paramedics
EWR-paramedics are on site from Newark's University Hospital.
JFK-ambulance is staffed by Port Authority PD police officer EMTs, paramedics come from Kennedy Medical Clinic. LGA-ambulance from New York Hospital-Queens. Not sure if EMT or paramedic, but I would bet paramedic because of New York State Department of Health public event medical staffing requirements. What's odd is that all three airports are covered by PAPD for policing and crash-rescue, yet they only provide EMS at one of the three. Many, many PAPD police officers have previous EMS experience (probably between 1/3-1/2 of the force were/are EMTs or paramedics.) Scot |
Originally Posted by jjmiller69
(Post 18946953)
Yes they all have(CRF) Crash Fire Rescue.
|
Originally Posted by jjmiller69
(Post 18943933)
Being a Paramedic <<SNIP>>The flight attendent said the Pilot was asking if we needed to divert. I made the decission not to and gave him the pt.'s vitals and that she was improving.
|
Originally Posted by OrvilleWright
(Post 18966444)
Hope this isn't too pedantic (is that even possible on FT?) but you didn't make that decision. You provided advice in the form of an opinion to the captain, who made the decision.
|
FYI for the public’s information from an available online SOP supposedly from a certain gumment agency, nothing in the redacted zone, I have no idea if this is real or an internet fabrication ;), bolding mine:
"T*A SCREENING MANAGEMENT SOP 4.3.8. EMERGENCY PERSONNEL If emergency personnel (for example, law enforcement, fire, medical) approach a TSO, the TSO must notify the STSO. The STSO must permit emergency personnel responding to an emergency and their equipment into the sterile area without screening. Emergency personnel must be accompanied into the sterile area by a sufficient number of escorts to preclude the transfer of a weapon between emergency personnel and other individuals in the sterile area. The escorts may be representatives of the airport or aircraft operator or individuals who are authorized unescorted access to the airport’s secured areas." |
Okay, so we have some evidence that the TSA would not interrupt emergency personnel in the event of an emergency.
But the rule still stands for US carriers operating international flights to the United States. It sounds like the staff at Narita were following a rule that pre-dated the TSA: anyone with access to a US-operated plane must be searched. The same rule (theoretically) applies to contract airline staff who are permitted access to a US-operated plane destined for Israel. If you watch at the gate, contract catering and support staff are frisked or wanded if they need to set foot on a Tel Aviv-bound flight. I should add that these friskings or wandings are usually very, very brief and ceremonial. It's questionable if this serves any purpose at all, but it certainly would defy common sense in the setting of a life-threatening emergency. |
Originally Posted by Flaflyer
(Post 18972036)
FYI for the public’s information from an available online SOP supposedly from a certain gumment agency, nothing in the redacted zone, I have no idea if this is real or an internet fabrication ;), bolding mine:
"T*A SCREENING MANAGEMENT SOP 4.3.8. EMERGENCY PERSONNEL If emergency personnel (for example, law enforcement, fire, medical) approach a TSO, the TSO must notify the STSO. The STSO must permit emergency personnel responding to an emergency and their equipment into the sterile area without screening. Emergency personnel must be accompanied into the sterile area by a sufficient number of escorts to preclude the transfer of a weapon between emergency personnel and other individuals in the sterile area. The escorts may be representatives of the airport or aircraft operator or individuals who are authorized unescorted access to the airport’s secured areas."
Originally Posted by Mats
(Post 18974713)
Okay, so we have some evidence that the TSA would not interrupt emergency personnel in the event of an emergency.
The only problem is it has never happened that way...Again theory ("policy") and reality are 180 degrees off. When I've responded to the airport; TSA has been more of a hindernce that required LE involvement to get TSA removed so we could work and help the patient. |
Originally Posted by Mats
(Post 18854986)
The TSA requires that any employee entering an aircraft bound for the US be frisked before entering (this is one reason that there are contract security agents standing at the Jetway entrance.)
Originally Posted by Mats
(Post 18854986)
2. Why don't these people have "trusted vendor" IDs that would let them aboard without further formalities?
|
Tehiota,
I should correct my statement. Based on my observation in nine countries, non-crew who need to gain access to an aircraft operated by a US carrier have to be frisked or wanded. There is usually contract agent standing at the entrance to the aircraft with a wand or to do the frisking. I assumed that this was a TSA regulation (and it predates September 11th, so it was probably an FAA regulation before then.) I can't imagine that they would require this procedure without a US mandate. It's possible that this only applies at "Category X" ("extraordinary risk") airports. Flights from Canada, Bermuda, etc. may be exempt. You're right, I've never seen a document stating that this is the rule, but I've also haven't searched for one. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 7:15 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.