Terminal dump at JFK 7
It took two hours but they realized a metal detector wasn't working.
http://news.yahoo.com/hundreds-evacu...171415179.html Flights must have taken off and yet did not explode. |
So the WTMD alarms SO SELDOM that two hours can pass without an alarm and the minder doesn't think that's odd? How numb can they be?
Or else the job itself is so numbing that they swap minders out every 5 minutes, so each one's visibility of the problem is only five minutes wide? Sheesh. Every SINGLE slot machine in a casino (or the gambling state's airports) is network monitored to make sure they don't "malfunction" and pay off too often, aren't they? I suppose the country's security is less important than the profitability of the smallest casino. Shouldn't the WTMD be emitting a random "screen this victim" alarm every so often? Did they fail to notice THIS for two hours as well? Another porous layer. They should just shut up about the fallibility of the machines. No bad guy was going to notice anyway. No need for the terminal dump to call attention to their idiocy. |
Originally Posted by TheRoadie
(Post 18809161)
So the WTMD alarms SO SELDOM that two hours can pass without an alarm and the minder doesn't think that's odd? How numb can they be?
|
Originally Posted by TheRoadie
(Post 18809161)
So the WTMD alarms SO SELDOM that two hours can pass without an alarm and the minder doesn't think that's odd? How numb can they be?
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/u..._content=Local Good job TSA! :rolleyes: |
They named the perp? Cool. Alija Abdul Majed, for the record.
And they "had no choice" but to run a terminal dump? Nah, they could have easily said - no bad guy got through. Let's just add one item to the checkpoint checklist and carry on. But no........ |
Got to love the comments to the NY Post article. How long have we got to put up with these TSA clowns before somebody takes a serious look at them and starts correcting these problems? They are a disgrace to this once proud country.
|
Originally Posted by spd476
(Post 18811217)
These fools are keeping us safe?!? The TSA’s bungling reached a new low yesterday when a JFK Airport terminal had to be evacuated and hundreds of passengers marched back through security screening all because one dimwitted agent failed to realize his metal detector had been unplugged, sources told The Post. The stunning error led to hours of delays, two planes called back from the runway and infinite frustration for furious passengers. “The truth is, this is the failure of the most basic level of diligence,” a law-enforcement source said. “How can you expect the public to feel confident of the mission of the TSA if they don’t even know if the lights are turned on?” |
The TSA would not confirm or deny that its detector had been unplugged, releasing a statement saying only that a metal detector suffered a “malfunction.” *actually cry because this is simply just so sad..... |
Originally Posted by goalie
(Post 18811419)
Sorry, but I just have to chuckle* with this piece of prose :rolleyes:
*actually cry because this is simply just so sad..... Others, like Jason Bailey, who was headed to San Diego, didn’t mind the delay. “It’s a big inconvenience, but it’s better safe than sorry,” he said. |
Originally Posted by mules
(Post 18808787)
It took two hours but they realized a metal detector wasn't working.
http://news.yahoo.com/hundreds-evacu...171415179.html Flights must have taken off and yet did not explode. Perhaps the TSA "trainers" could invent a new tool called checklists? Perhaps one prior to opening checkpoint and another for hand-off? Although I certainly do appreciate the TSA's efforts and giving us material. :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by TheRoadie
(Post 18809161)
How numb can they be?
|
Originally Posted by TheRoadie
(Post 18811283)
They named the perp? Cool. Alija Abdul Majed, for the record.
And they "had no choice" but to run a terminal dump? Nah, they could have easily said - no bad guy got through. Let's just add one item to the checkpoint checklist and carry on. But no........ |
did the other layers of security ensure that there was no risk to the traveling public?
|
Originally Posted by Combat Medic
(Post 18812351)
did the other layers of security ensure that there was no risk to the traveling public?
I meant, of course, the illusion was imposing and impregnable. To characterize the existing theater as infallible would be an insult to the word. That said, the risk was slightly elevated during the screening gap. From 1 in 42,000,000,000 to 1 in 45,000,000,000 I estimate. Less than my choking to death on tropical drink umbrella, I figure. |
If one of the pax going through the powerless WTMD noticed the lights weren't on and said something, would they get charged with "interfering in the screening process"?
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:14 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.