FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/checkpoints-borders-policy-debate-687/)
-   -   Interesting experience at JFK opt out (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/checkpoints-borders-policy-debate/1314017-interesting-experience-jfk-opt-out.html)

clrankin Feb 16, 2012 12:16 pm


Originally Posted by Global_Hi_Flyer (Post 18027848)
I find IAD to be not only totally unprepared but outright hostile to keeping things in sight. And hostile to the grope - the last one I had the screener was visibly angry at being asked to change gloves. I also had to get vocal and demand a supervisor when they tried to place me out of sight of my belongings.

I've tried to avoid IAD in my travels as much as possible. If it tells you anything about how bad TSA is there (bad as in disrespectful, hostile, not following SOP, etc). I live in western Loudoun county and will drive the ~90 minutes to get to DCA rather than take the ~25 minute drive to IAD. In fact, this week I opted to drive to BWI and fly from there, rather than deal with IAD.

I don't know what the problem is with IAD TSA, but there is a problem. I wish their FSD would start looking for ways to solve these things, but alas TSA doesn't appear to care about customer service issues.

chollie Feb 16, 2012 12:25 pm


Originally Posted by barbell (Post 18027994)
In this scenario, do they test the gloves for explosives, or do they just do a full-on grope, or a resolution grope, or what?

I've never seen an ETD machine at the exit of a NoS, and I've only ever seen half-hearted rubbing there.

Full-on grope, because nothing has been 'resolved' (or not) by the scan - but if you're opting out, you're going to get some version of a 'full-on' grope anyway. Same goes for ETD testing - opt-out, you may or may not get the ETD testing (at least in my experience).

It avoids a possible punitive wait for a dedicated groper that you experience at some airports. There's always a groper stationed at the exit of the NoS to immediately resolve any anomalies (or else the line starts backing up). Depending on checkpoint configuration, it can be easier to track your belongings and you're less likely to encounter a TSO who deliberately steps in your line of sight when you say you can't see your belongings from where you are waiting.

Superguy Feb 16, 2012 1:29 pm


Originally Posted by clrankin (Post 18028292)
I've tried to avoid IAD in my travels as much as possible. If it tells you anything about how bad TSA is there (bad as in disrespectful, hostile, not following SOP, etc). I live in western Loudoun county and will drive the ~90 minutes to get to DCA rather than take the ~25 minute drive to IAD. In fact, this week I opted to drive to BWI and fly from there, rather than deal with IAD.

Given BWI's rep for TSA, it must be really bad at IAD if you'd drive that far and would rather put up with them. :eek:

Global_Hi_Flyer Feb 16, 2012 1:56 pm


Originally Posted by Superguy (Post 18028824)
Given BWI's rep for TSA, it must be really bad at IAD if you'd drive that far and would rather put up with them. :eek:

My last experience through BWI was far and away better than IAD. Used to be you could avoid the strip-search machine at BWI if you were on AA or DL.... but DL's moved to a strip-search concourse. I *think* AA still can avoid the machines. But that will change before long.

BWI is bad, but IAD is really bad.

mybodyismyown Feb 16, 2012 4:29 pm

BWI now has a scanner-free checkpoint for A/B gates which serve Southwest airlines and Airtran! It's located downstairs next to the baggage conveyer belts. Ever since it opened, I've been able to fly from BWI without (much) fear of being ogled or sexually abused. It's also usually operating with zero wait time.

clrankin Feb 18, 2012 9:28 am

I flew US this time from BWI and had no problem going through the checkpoint last Monday. I don't even think the cancertrons were up and running then.

Coming back from DFW on Thursday, I took a short walk to the DL gates at Terminal E and found a pervert-o-vision free checkpoint relatively easily. I almost used the checkpoint closer to the US counters there, but when I saw that TSA had an employee just standing there and blocking off the WTMD I decided to go elsewhere. It's amazing that someone actually has a job that just involves standing there and blocking the WTMD... welfare at work, I guess.

jason8612 Feb 18, 2012 9:38 am


Originally Posted by clrankin (Post 18039425)
I flew US this time from BWI and had no problem going through the checkpoint last Monday. I don't even think the cancertrons were up and running then.

Coming back from DFW on Thursday, I took a short walk to the DL gates at Terminal E and found a pervert-o-vision free checkpoint relatively easily. I almost used the checkpoint closer to the US counters there, but when I saw that TSA had an employee just standing there and blocking off the WTMD I decided to go elsewhere. It's amazing that someone actually has a job that just involves standing there and blocking the WTMD... welfare at work, I guess.

I wish my job was so easy

InkUnderNails Feb 18, 2012 6:42 pm


Originally Posted by jason8612 (Post 18039480)
I wish my job was so easy

Actually, my job is much easier than theirs.

I do not have the ethical and moral weaknesses nor the comfort of overriding Constitutional protections required to to what they do, and if I tried to do so I would find it greatly difficult, if not impossible.

Pesky Monkey Feb 18, 2012 10:20 pm


Originally Posted by clrankin (Post 18039425)
I flew US this time from BWI and had no problem going through the checkpoint last Monday. I don't even think the cancertrons were up and running then.

Coming back from DFW on Thursday, I took a short walk to the DL gates at Terminal E and found a pervert-o-vision free checkpoint relatively easily. I almost used the checkpoint closer to the US counters there, but when I saw that TSA had an employee just standing there and blocking off the WTMD I decided to go elsewhere. It's amazing that someone actually has a job that just involves standing there and blocking the WTMD... welfare at work, I guess.

DCA on Tuesday had TWO people blocking the metal detector. For the first time in my short opt-out career the guy behind me opted out as well. We discussed why the second guy was just standing there looking straight ahead as we made fun of him. Eventually they made him do my companion's grope. It was amazing how slow the line moved. 20 minutes for 6 people. Every single person through the nude-o-scope got groped. Several had to wait for me to get my grope due to the double opt out. So much for technology. :)

squatch Feb 19, 2012 6:11 pm


Originally Posted by jason8612 (Post 18011766)
I was flying out of T4 (LX F) and when they escorted me to the security checkpoint, I was waived to the body scanner. I opted out and waited...and waited...and waited until looking at the time and the agent waiting for me, decided I'll go thru the body scanner. I told the TSO that I will decline the opt out and go thru, which I was waived in. Just as I started collecting my bags, another TSO came over and told me that I need a pat down as I opted out. I argued a bit, but got nowhere, which then he proceeded to give me the pat down in slow motion taking a good 10minutes. Of course by this time I was quite angry but they did hold the plane for me (being in F) .
If I declined the opt out and go thru the body scanners am I still subject to a secondary search?

i have experienced the same BS at T5 at JFK.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 4:15 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.