Terminal Dump at MAF after US Soldier attempts to bring bomb thru TSA checkpoint
#91
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Catania, Sicily/South Jersey (PHL)/Houston, Texas/Red Stick/airborne in-between
Programs: United Global Svs, AA PlatPro, WN RR, AZ/ITA Freccia, Hilton Diam, Bonvoy Gold, Hertz Prez, IHG
Posts: 3,535
#92
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Wash D.C. metro area
Posts: 254
#93
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: LGA - JFK
Programs: UA, AA, DL, B6, CX, KE, Latitude, VIFP, Crown & Anchor, etc.
Posts: 2,589
Wait, if every elite Army special forces team are routinely backpacking safely 2.5 pounds of clay, amng other things, wherever they go - would somebody mind running an inventory audit inside our armory every so often - my neighbors next door would feel a little safer from hometown would-be terrorists just in case we cannot account for more than 2 lbs. but assumed it's been blown up already?
I wouldn't worry about the blasting caps or ignitors as I'm sure "they" all knew how to improvise & make it work, out of necessity ...
#94
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,320
That was already answered previously.
We know, but at what point? How about the question of whether he traveled with the C4 on the outbound?
BTW, C4 is a heavy duty explosive, but it is very stable such that you can pretty much hit it, light it and throw it without an explosion occurring (unlike the liquid explosives that were purported to be the subject of the "liquid bomb plot").
We know, but at what point? How about the question of whether he traveled with the C4 on the outbound?
BTW, C4 is a heavy duty explosive, but it is very stable such that you can pretty much hit it, light it and throw it without an explosion occurring (unlike the liquid explosives that were purported to be the subject of the "liquid bomb plot").
They even tried robotically stomping on it while it was on fire, no boom.
#95
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Catania, Sicily/South Jersey (PHL)/Houston, Texas/Red Stick/airborne in-between
Programs: United Global Svs, AA PlatPro, WN RR, AZ/ITA Freccia, Hilton Diam, Bonvoy Gold, Hertz Prez, IHG
Posts: 3,535
#96
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,237
I'd be very surprised if that ever happens. There have been a couple times when TSA went very quiet - John Tyner and Yukio Miyamae come to mind.
The guy is Special Forces. If he maintains that the C4 (and smoke grenade) were in his bag from the time he left Afghanistan until the checkpoints, they're going to have a tough time getting him to change his story. No waterboarding allowed!
I think the real fall-out from this is that we (pax) are all going to pay the price for TSA's lapse somehow.
'Re-training' for TSOs (instead of discipline).
'Re-education' for citizens who just want to travel by air.
The guy is Special Forces. If he maintains that the C4 (and smoke grenade) were in his bag from the time he left Afghanistan until the checkpoints, they're going to have a tough time getting him to change his story. No waterboarding allowed!
I think the real fall-out from this is that we (pax) are all going to pay the price for TSA's lapse somehow.
'Re-training' for TSOs (instead of discipline).
'Re-education' for citizens who just want to travel by air.
#97
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,195
Maybe.
He brought the C4 back with him from the war, stored it for a couple of weeks in his garage, then took it with him on the flight in question. Most likely he flew back from Afghanistan using a military contract flight, if not an actual military flight, and would not have been screened by the TSA. How he got from his flight termination point to his home is a good question, and may not have involved a commercial flight.
Been there, done that. It burns pretty good, better than wax.
Several weeks earlier this individual was the subject of another EIR with TSA. The item he was carrying then contained parts that were designed specifically as a detonator.
emphasis mine
Military hops do not use the TSA for screening. Sounds to me like he never went through a TSA checkpoint until he was found with the smoke grenade (initiator), and then again with the C4.
Special forces huh? Obviously not the brightest bulb in the pack.
Several weeks earlier this individual was the subject of another EIR with TSA. The item he was carrying then contained parts that were designed specifically as a detonator.
Military hops do not use the TSA for screening. Sounds to me like he never went through a TSA checkpoint until he was found with the smoke grenade (initiator), and then again with the C4.
Special forces huh? Obviously not the brightest bulb in the pack.
Last edited by TSORon; Jan 5, 2012 at 6:50 pm Reason: Add
#98
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ATL Lost Luggage
Programs: Kettle with Kryptonium Medallion Tags
Posts: 10,211
Most likely he flew back from Afghanistan using a military contract flight, if not an actual military flight, and would not have been screened by the TSA. How he got from his flight termination point to his home is a good question, and may not have involved a commercial flight.
Anyway, as many of us FTers have vivid memories of being on regular commercial flights with returning soldiers, I trust that you can understand why we suspect that Sergeant Atwater flew to MAF on a commercial flight.
#99
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 8,956
He brought the C4 back with him from the war, stored it for a couple of weeks in his garage, then took it with him on the flight in question. Most likely he flew back from Afghanistan using a military contract flight, if not an actual military flight, and would not have been screened by the TSA. How he got from his flight termination point to his home is a good question, and may not have involved a commercial flight.
Several weeks earlier this individual was the subject of another EIR with TSA. The item he was carrying then contained parts that were designed specifically as a detonator.
Military hops do not use the TSA for screening. Sounds to me like he never went through a TSA checkpoint until he was found with the smoke grenade (initiator), and then again with the C4.
Several weeks earlier this individual was the subject of another EIR with TSA. The item he was carrying then contained parts that were designed specifically as a detonator.
Military hops do not use the TSA for screening. Sounds to me like he never went through a TSA checkpoint until he was found with the smoke grenade (initiator), and then again with the C4.
You state, "He brought the C4 back with him from the war, stored it for a couple of weeks in his garage, then took it with him on the flight in question." You conveniently skipped over the crux of the issue: how did the C4 make it from his garage in North Carolina to Texas. You admit that he went through a TSA checkpoint on his trip from NC to Texas as that is when the smoke grenade was found. The issue is whether the C4 was also in the carry-on and missed.
"The item he was carrying then contained parts that were designed specifically as a detonator" makes it sounds ominous and a nefarious plot as opposed to the item being a "smoke grenade (initiator)". I'm not trying to minimize the damage that can be done with releasing a smoke grenade in an airplane, but I wouldn't think that if someone was trying to smuggle a detonator on board, they would do it in the guise of a smoke grenade.
Last edited by ND Sol; Jan 6, 2012 at 7:43 am Reason: Not not
#100
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,237
Number one question still remains unanswered: if his story is true, screeners in Fayetteville looked in his bag, confiscated the smoke grenade and left 2 pounds of explosive.
I expect the spin on this will be that Fayetteville took the smoke grenade (possible detonator) and 'admonished' him. TSA will then point out that, as Mythbusters has shown, the explosive by itself, without a detonator, was not a threat and 'at no time was the travelling public at risk'.
Not that the same logic applies where cupcakes are concerned, of course...
I expect the spin on this will be that Fayetteville took the smoke grenade (possible detonator) and 'admonished' him. TSA will then point out that, as Mythbusters has shown, the explosive by itself, without a detonator, was not a threat and 'at no time was the travelling public at risk'.
Not that the same logic applies where cupcakes are concerned, of course...
#101
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Wash D.C. metro area
Posts: 254
He brought the C4 back with him from the war, stored it for a couple of weeks in his garage, then took it with him on the flight in question. Most likely he flew back from Afghanistan using a military contract flight, if not an actual military flight, and would not have been screened by the TSA. How he got from his flight termination point to his home is a good question, and may not have involved a commercial flight.
He flew commercial from NC to Midland TX. Thats where they caught the smoke grenade. FAIL
#102
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Catania, Sicily/South Jersey (PHL)/Houston, Texas/Red Stick/airborne in-between
Programs: United Global Svs, AA PlatPro, WN RR, AZ/ITA Freccia, Hilton Diam, Bonvoy Gold, Hertz Prez, IHG
Posts: 3,535
Just admit the failure.
#103
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
It is amazing that many peolpe do not get this.
As pointed out by the GAO, the FBI, and various other agencies, the greatest risk is an un-assembled IED. It is more difficult to see on the x-ray. It can potentially be brought in at different airports. People involved do not need be on the same flight; they do not need to meet - one person can dump an item in a trash can for another to pick up in an hour or so later.
Explosives found at the checkpiont is such a rare event that dumping the terminal is a prudent measure. After which a sweep of the terminal should be conducted, and passengers/employees re-screened. To not do so would be silly. Would be stupid, actually.
But I suspect that many on this site will complain about TSA no matter what happens. Goes with the territory, I guess.
As pointed out by the GAO, the FBI, and various other agencies, the greatest risk is an un-assembled IED. It is more difficult to see on the x-ray. It can potentially be brought in at different airports. People involved do not need be on the same flight; they do not need to meet - one person can dump an item in a trash can for another to pick up in an hour or so later.
Explosives found at the checkpiont is such a rare event that dumping the terminal is a prudent measure. After which a sweep of the terminal should be conducted, and passengers/employees re-screened. To not do so would be silly. Would be stupid, actually.
But I suspect that many on this site will complain about TSA no matter what happens. Goes with the territory, I guess.
There's a reason why people don't wear broken wristwatches, notwithstanding that they display the right time twice a day.
#104
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: BWI
Programs: UA 1K, IC RA
Posts: 147
It may have been said before but C4 by itself is harmless. I've used the stuff on the bottom of a canteen cup to heat coffee and never once was blown up. The Soldier is question did not have a "bomb" he had explosive material, there is a big difference.
#105
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,974
Incredibly stupid on both counts, but not a threat. The issue is the TSA apparently missing a large enough block of explosive (if inert) material which they are paid to umm... notice. Attempts to deflect this incredible error serve only to emphasize just how damaging it is. What's that about "getting it right every time" ? Pah!