![]() |
Gate patdowns and detainment at DEN
I was flying from DEN recently...
TSA came along for the gate checks. This gate had an area that was segregated for inspections. In this case, they were pulling people out of line for thorough pat-downs. :mad: After the pat-downs, they forced people to stay within this segregated area. :mad::mad: One person tried to leave and was coerced by TSA to stay withing the inspection area. Since the flight wasn't ready to leave (about 10 min.), these people, IMO, were being detained unlawfully by TSA. FWIW, there was no LEO in sight. Has anyone else seen this? Do any of our resident legal beagles have thoughts on the legality of this approach? |
I wonder if cows feel the same way...
No wondering needed, now we know. |
Originally Posted by ScatterX
(Post 17479715)
Do any of our resident legal beagles have thoughts on the legality of this approach?
:mad: |
Originally Posted by saulblum
(Post 17480591)
Unless a passenger (prisoner?) decided to leave the detainment area and enter the sterile side...
|
Originally Posted by Wally Bird
(Post 17480674)
Gate checks are already in the "sterile side". Which I think was the point.
|
While I don't like the gate searches, once you have passed muster, you are "free to go" and cannot be told that you must be kept segregated as that is a detention and TSO's have no power to detain and only a LEO can detain and TSO's are not LEO's. :mad:
|
Originally Posted by ScatterX
(Post 17479715)
I was flying from DEN recently...
TSA came along for the gate checks. This gate had an area that was segregated for inspections. In this case, they were pulling people out of line for thorough pat-downs. |
Not sure if these links will help, but they may shed some light on TSA policies regarding sterile areas and bag searches. I should have some more (recent) info regarding policy and procedure in the upcoming weeks.
*I posted these in another thread as well, but for some reason the thread is not visible (yet). Cheers http://cryptome.org/tsa-ssi-02.pdf http://www.airsafe.com/issues/securi...t-redacted.pdf http://publicintelligence.net/ssi-t....ncy-amendment/ http://www.leighfisher.com/trb/575-3-05-0258.pdf |
Originally Posted by goalie
(Post 17481336)
While I don't like the gate searches, once you have passed muster, you are "free to go" and cannot be told that you must be kept segregated as that is a detention and TSO's have no power to detain and only a LEO can detain and TSO's are not LEO's. :mad:
Originally Posted by RatherBeOnATrain
(Post 17481568)
Was it a DCA-bound flight?
|
Originally Posted by goalie
(Post 17481336)
While I don't like the gate searches, once you have passed muster, you are "free to go" and cannot be told that you must be kept segregated as that is a detention and TSO's have no power to detain and only a LEO can detain and TSO's are not LEO's. :mad:
Pure speculation would venture that YES said non-conforming party could be escorted from the 'sterile area' as it appears on the surface that the TSOs do have the authority to deny entry to the 'sterile area' and/or to an aircraft. |
Originally Posted by ScatterX
(Post 17481803)
I agree. If this had happened to me (I just witnessed it), I would have made a pretty big stink and given them the "am I free to leave" rigamarole.
|
Originally Posted by MIT_SBM
(Post 17481862)
I think this begs another question - IF one were to decide that they were "free to go" when the TSO obviously did not agree with that sentiment could said TSO then have the party in question escorted from the 'sterile area'?
Pure speculation would venture that YES said non-conforming party could be escorted from the 'sterile area' as it appears on the surface that the TSOs do have the authority to deny entry to the 'sterile area' and/or to an aircraft. Escorting a person that has completed the gate check out of the sterile area, simply for getting back in line or joining his companions, is something I'd love to see them try. This seems like easy pickings for a good lawyer. |
Originally Posted by ScatterX
(Post 17481966)
I think there is a big difference between somebody who refuses a gate search and somebody who complies with it fully, but is then told they must stay within certain area.
Escorting a person that has completed the gate check out of the sterile area, simply for getting back in line or joining his companions, is something I'd love to see them try. This seems like easy pickings for a good lawyer. |
Originally Posted by MIT_SBM
(Post 17481862)
I think this begs another question - IF one were to decide that they were "free to go" when the TSO obviously did not agree with that sentiment could said TSO then have the party in question escorted from the 'sterile area'?
Pure speculation would venture that YES said non-conforming party could be escorted from the 'sterile area' as it appears on the surface that the TSOs do have the authority to deny entry to the 'sterile area' and/or to an aircraft. "Gate Checks" rarely involve a supervisor, so to have someone escorted from the sterile area (for whatever reason) either an STSO (unlikely, they have checkpoints to run) or a LEO must be involved. TSORon |
Originally Posted by TSORon
(Post 17482019)
The standard TSO does not have the authority to deny access to the sterile area, only a supervisor or manager and above can do that. And of course LEO's, Airport Security Managers, etc.
"Gate Checks" rarely involve a supervisor, so to have someone escorted from the sterile area (for whatever reason) either an STSO (unlikely, they have checkpoints to run) or a LEO must be involved. TSORon |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:11 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.