Gate patdowns and detainment at DEN
#46
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Up in the air far too often.
Programs: Star Gold
Posts: 354
#47
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards. Tha... that's about it.
Posts: 4,332
Not necessarily - it might be part of some Double Secret Investigation and can't be revealed to the public or it would compromise National Sequrtee.
Geez, I can't even type that stuff sarcastically without wincing. I have heard the argument so many times, and it frustrates me - "You don't know how many terrorist attacks the government has stopped and not told us about them!"
Geez, I can't even type that stuff sarcastically without wincing. I have heard the argument so many times, and it frustrates me - "You don't know how many terrorist attacks the government has stopped and not told us about them!"
#50
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: LAS
Posts: 1,279
Wally had fair chance. The answer is ZERO.
The more important question is whether or not TSA made any reasonable evaluation of the cost of this activity (in terms of dollars, time, degradation of rights, etc.) versus the benefit of it. If they are acting responsibly, they should be able to demonstrate that this program is reasonable.
Of course the likelihood that they did this properly (including independent review of the analysis) is, not surprising, also ZERO.
The more important question is whether or not TSA made any reasonable evaluation of the cost of this activity (in terms of dollars, time, degradation of rights, etc.) versus the benefit of it. If they are acting responsibly, they should be able to demonstrate that this program is reasonable.
Of course the likelihood that they did this properly (including independent review of the analysis) is, not surprising, also ZERO.
#51
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: LGA
Programs: Double Unobtainium, Grace L. Ferguson Airline & Storm Door Co.
Posts: 154
No response yet.
If SATTSO apparently is unwilling to respond, perhaps TSORon will answer the question. How about it?
#53
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,195
My primary question is, "Why do gate screenings or any sort of screenings within the sterile area exist at all? Don't these screenings presuppose a failure of the screening at the checkpoint? After all, one cannot get into the sterile area without going through a checkpoint and being screened."
I'd like to see the TSA's response if a traveler is selected for a gate screening and flat out refuses, stating, "No, I will not submit. I was screened thoroughly at the checkpoint. I am not carrying any prohibited items and have no evil intent, and those facts were confirmed by your own co-workers when I was screened at the checkpoint on entry to the sterile area. If you want confirmation, go talk to the TSOs who conducted my screening at the checkpoint."
You take far too narrow a view of what "screening" is. Passenger screening begins a long time before you ever get to the airport, and continues well past your last flight. TSA screening is not just at the checkpoint.
#54
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
My primary question is, "Why do gate screenings or any sort of screenings within the sterile area exist at all? Don't these screenings presuppose a failure of the screening at the checkpoint? After all, one cannot get into the sterile area without going through a checkpoint and being screened."
Last edited by jkhuggins; Nov 25, 2011 at 6:50 pm Reason: typo
#55
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,592
Not necessarily - it might be part of some Double Secret Investigation and can't be revealed to the public or it would compromise National Sequrtee.
Geez, I can't even type that stuff sarcastically without wincing. I have heard the argument so many times, and it frustrates me - "You don't know how many terrorist attacks the government has stopped and not told us about them!"
Geez, I can't even type that stuff sarcastically without wincing. I have heard the argument so many times, and it frustrates me - "You don't know how many terrorist attacks the government has stopped and not told us about them!"
#56
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: LAS
Posts: 1,279
TSO’s do not have the authority to detain anyone for anything. Telling someone to stay in a certain area so that the screening process can be completed is not detaining them, its keeping them at hand for screening purposes or ensuring that unscreened individuals do not mix with screened. You are assuming that it is illegal, yet it is not.
You said it yourself. TSOs do not have the authority to detain people. Unless of course, it's not really detainment if they force you to stay in a certain spot, just in case they might feel like screening you again.
Using your definition, a person going through the checkpoint could be locked in a room, for any period of time, until they are ready to board. This is OK since they are going to be screened again. Even after they are screened again, they must stay in this room because they cannot mingle with others. In your world, this is just one long screening process, right?
#57
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,878
.....TSO’s do not have the authority to detain anyone for anything. Telling someone to stay in a certain area so that the screening process can be completed is not detaining them, its keeping them at hand for screening purposes or ensuring that unscreened individuals do not mix with screened. You are assuming that it is illegal, yet it is not. TSA’s authority extends throughout the sterile areas, the secured areas, and the SIDA areas of all commercial airports in the USA, not just the checkpoint. Keeping the screened passengers separate from the unscreened passengers is a solid security concept, and a good practice.........
After the pat-downs, they forced people to stay within this segregated area.
All pax are screened prior to entering the sterile area and once cleared, they are free to proceed into the sterile area. If some pax at a particular gate are selected for gate screening, once they are cleared, they are free to continue their activities inside the sterile area. Simple, no?
#58
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,195
Your “goal posts” were inappropriately placed in the first post it seems. Gate Screening is done immediately prior to the last boarding pass check inside the terminal, while the passengers are queuing up to board the aircraft. Once the screening is completed, the passenger has the gate agent verify their boarding pass and the passenger then walks down the jetway to their aircraft. After gate screening one does not go wandering around the sterile area looking in the shops and getting coffee, not unless they are intentionally trying to miss their flight. But even supposing they do, then the answer is quite simple, they get rescreened, at the gate.
Leave? And go where, Disneyland? Long walk off a short pier? They “should” be boarding their aircraft, not going elsewhere. After all, that is the normal use of an air terminal, to board an aircraft isn’t it? Maybe we have different ideas of what “gate screening” actually is. Could be that your hypothetical person misinterpreted what was happening and underwent some other form of screening, not actual “gate screening”.
As I said, screening neither begins nor ends at the TSA checkpoint. There is far more to the screening process than you seem to be aware of. It’s a “process”, and a fairly lengthy one at that.
You can take what I have written as far out of context as you like, it’s not going to make your interpretation of what happened accurate. When you start off with a false premise then you naturally will most likely end up with an incorrect conclusion.
Only if you subscribe to scatterX’s interpretation of the events. As I stated to him/her, his/her understanding of the events is seriously lacking.
And that activity should be going to the gate agent, getting final clearance to board the aircraft, and then doing so. “Gate Screening” is done at the boarding gate. For this theoretical passenger to have experienced what scatter (or the OP) describes would not have been gate screening. Therefore one of the two is mistaking “gate screening” for something else entirely. False premise, false conclusion.
The case in point is a person that was screened and when the screening was obviously complete, he asked to leave. He was told no. The lady next to him asked if she could leave after her screening was obviously done and was also told no. There was NO additional screening to be conducted. They wanted to leave and were told they COULD NOT. The reason is immaterial. These people were detained.
Using your definition, a person going through the checkpoint could be locked in a room, for any period of time, until they are ready to board. This is OK since they are going to be screened again. Even after they are screened again, they must stay in this room because they cannot mingle with others. In your world, this is just one long screening process, right?
Only if you subscribe to scatterX’s interpretation of the events. As I stated to him/her, his/her understanding of the events is seriously lacking.
All pax are screened prior to entering the sterile area and once cleared, they are free to proceed into the sterile area. If some pax at a particular gate are selected for gate screening, once they are cleared, they are free to continue their activities inside the sterile area. Simple, no?
#59
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: SW Rapid Rewards, Hilton Honors, Marriott, Avis First
Posts: 4,831
Leave? And go where, Disneyland? Long walk off a short pier? They “should” be boarding their aircraft, not going elsewhere. After all, that is the normal use of an air terminal, to board an aircraft isn’t it? Maybe we have different ideas of what “gate screening” actually is. Could be that your hypothetical person misinterpreted what was happening and underwent some other form of screening, not actual “gate screening”.
Yup. There aren't any restrooms or bars or restaurants or trinket shops or newsstands or lounges or observation areas or charging stations. Just gates.
#60
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
Leave? And go where, Disneyland? Long walk off a short pier? They “should” be boarding their aircraft, not going elsewhere. After all, that is the normal use of an air terminal, to board an aircraft isn’t it? Maybe we have different ideas of what “gate screening” actually is. Could be that your hypothetical person misinterpreted what was happening and underwent some other form of screening, not actual “gate screening”.
I think it's entirely possible that the TSOs performing gate screening decided to start screening passengers prior to the gate agent formally beginning boarding --- perhaps in a desire to speed up the entire process, given the frequent reports that gate screenings can delay flight departures. Unfortunately, this could lead to the bizarre situation where a passenger had completed gate screening by TSA but was not being allowed to board by the airline ... leaving them in a no-man's land.