BOS - "New Procedure" - Shoes On Belt
Boston is leading the way again in TSA uselessness.
Today during my water bottle seizure tour. The TSO announced that all shoes had to be placed on the belt. The following questions come to mind: 1. If the bins impact the ability of Cray machine for screening then how can any article be allowed in a bin? 2. If it doesn't, then why create another item handling delay? 3. What about the secondary shoes that are inside other containers? Are they deem non-threating because of location? 4. Can I opt-out of shoe xray and request my shoes be subject to an alternative inspection like film? 5. When the belt operator crushes, scuffs, or damages my foot ware with other items on the belt is there a process for compensation? |
|
Shoes on belt isn't new. They've been doing this the last few years at least they have when I've flown.
|
Just ignore it. I only had one episode with them trying to remove my shoes from a bin (they were athletic shoes with long laces): I asked if they were willing to risk damaging my shoes & getting them stuck in the machine (this was JFK) - the screener decided it wasn't worth arguing.
|
Originally Posted by DL_TIDE
(Post 17389270)
Boston is leading the way again in TSA uselessness.
Today during my water bottle seizure tour. The TSO announced that all shoes had to be placed on the belt. The following questions come to mind: 1. If the bins impact the ability of Cray machine for screening then how can any article be allowed in a bin? 2. If it doesn't, then why create another item handling delay? 3. What about the secondary shoes that are inside other containers? Are they deem non-threating because of location? 4. Can I opt-out of shoe xray and request my shoes be subject to an alternative inspection like film? 5. When the belt operator crushes, scuffs, or damages my foot ware with other items on the belt is there a process for compensation? That said, I've seen people ask if it's OK to put their shoes in a bin and never heard an objection from TSA. If that happens with 5 out of 2,500 people, it may add 1/10 second to the delay and that's a so what. Not sure what the beef is. |
I have been through checkpoints that have done both, require shoes be placed on the belt or basically don’t care where the shoes are.
For me I could care less, if they want the shoes on the belt, so be it, there are far more problems with TSA abuses of our constitutional rights than shoes on the belt or in a bin to worry about. My personal preference is all shoes on the belt, I don’t like the idea of putting my jacket in a bin that probably had someone’s dirty shoes in it before, who knows what they stepped in before they put their shoes in the bin. This, and to prevent any sticky fingered screeners from stealing any of my personal possessions, especially my wallet is the reason everything I place in my carry on and is locked up, even my jacket if it fits in. Mr. Elliott |
I prefer belt as well. Winter is approaching here in BOS and I've been told it's to keep the bins cleaner. Slush, sand, and salt being to gather in the tubs. I suppose it's easier to clean the table and belt than the bins.
|
Originally Posted by Mr. Elliott
(Post 17390615)
I have been through checkpoints that have done both, require shoes be placed on the belt or basically don’t care where the shoes are.
I'm in the habit of asking beforehand. Saves being yelled at :rolleyes: . |
Originally Posted by WChou
(Post 17390659)
I prefer belt as well. Winter is approaching here in BOS and I've been told it's to keep the bins cleaner. Slush, sand, and salt being to gather in the tubs. I suppose it's easier to clean the table and belt than the bins.
__________________ 2011 McDonalds Chicken McNuggets Eaten: 291 2011 KFC Double Down "Sandwiches" Eaten: 1 Otherwise: +1 |
Originally Posted by DL_TIDE
(Post 17390793)
I'm having hard time with your statement. Do you really expect us to believe that you actually consumed an entire KFC Double Down sandwich?
Otherwise: +1 Once again, baseless criticism of a poster. I didn't read anything in his signature about having actually kept it down. Mike |
The last, perhaps only, two screeners I have thanked was because they were insisting travellers put shoes on the belt. In the bin is just ickey.
|
Originally Posted by mikeef
(Post 17392586)
:rolleyes:
Once again, baseless criticism of a poster. I didn't read anything in his signature about having actually kept it down. Mike To add to the original post, this is more TSA inefficiency and poor employee management running under the guise of unpredictability. Yelling at people to put shoes on the belt is simple harassment and power tripping. |
Originally Posted by mikeef
(Post 17392586)
:rolleyes:
Once again, baseless criticism of a poster. I didn't read anything in his signature about having actually kept it down. Mike First: My post was a question not a statement. :rolleyes: Second: Asking if Eaten = Consumed is not assuming it was kept down in fact I was asking just the opposite. :rolleyes: Third: With your logic I'm suspecting your a TSA employee. Is my assumption correct? :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by WChou
(Post 17392905)
I believe the comment was made tongue in cheek. I take no offense. The sig was done with full knowledge that people will have fun with it. And yes, I did retain the Double Down for a period of time. :)
|
When i first heard over a year ago that shoes were not supposed to be put in bins i stopped doing it. Now that i have started to opt-out of the NOS I'm thankful i followed that guideline. I get to hear the TSO's grumble about me having too much stuff and they need to ask for assistance in gather my belongings.
Its not my fault i need to put out two bins. One for my large laptop and one for my liquids and coat, belt etc. That's in addition to my shoes, carry-on and personal item. I'm just following their silly rules |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:12 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.