Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

Politico.com: "TSA, not flying high fiscally, looks for cash"

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Politico.com: "TSA, not flying high fiscally, looks for cash"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 11, 2011, 7:02 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN - BNA
Programs: Hilton Gold, WN RR
Posts: 1,818
Politico.com: "TSA, not flying high fiscally, looks for cash"

Surprised not to have seen this here today:

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/65565.html

The Transportation Security Administration isn’t making many friends.

If long screening lines, privacy invasions and other TSA-inflicted indignities weren’t enough, the agency now faces a funding battle. A decade since the agency was created in response to the Sept. 11 attacks, a debate is raging over the cost of aviation security and who should foot the bill.
Even Rep. John Mica, the Florida Republican who set up the agency, is now pushing to dismantle and privatize what he calls his “little ....... child.”

The TSA is only going to grow. Aviation experts predict increases in domestic air travel as the economy recovers — and that the bigger traffic flow through the nation’s airports will swamp the current “one-size-fits-all” screening unless the TSA receives a bump in its annual budget of about $8 billion.

The White House’s recent proposal to triple the security fee for fliers — part of its deficit reduction plan — has added urgency to the discussion. The airline lobby blanketed Capitol Hill in recent weeks to tell members of Congress and their staffs why the hike would result in thousands of lost jobs, service cuts and higher fares.

“We have soundly beat them back every year and plan to do that again this year,” said Sharon Pinkerton, vice president of government affairs at the Air Transport Association. “Part of our success is people’s frustrations with the growth of the TSA. This agency needs to get its act together.”
(can I get an AMEN...)
divemistressofthedark is offline  
Old Oct 11, 2011, 7:11 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: A small town in North Georgia
Programs: DL Platinum Medallion, AA
Posts: 1,625
I thought you were going to say the TSA would be confiscating any cash found during searches that they deem an excessive amount.
Georgia Peach is online now  
Old Oct 11, 2011, 7:12 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: IAD
Programs: *wood Gold
Posts: 1,781
TSA running short on money... perhaps that explains why they hire and continue to employ so many screeners with "sticky fingers"... They're not shoving that iPad down their pants for personal gain, it's for patriotism and in the name of security.
clrankin is offline  
Old Oct 11, 2011, 8:25 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 642
They can't afford rubber gloves to prevent the spread of disease and cross contamination. Yet they keep spending millions, hundreds of millions, on unproven technology and over priced id scanners, that, technically, should replace the illiterates at the podium for that price. That is the TSA for you, incompetent, overpriced and tripping all over itself.
jtodd is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2011, 10:14 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Arizona
Programs: Star Alliance - chairman, HH - Diamond, Marriott - Platinum, TSA - Dog Dung.
Posts: 140
Originally Posted by divemistressofthedark
Surprised not to have seen this here today:

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/65565.html



(can I get an AMEN...)
Not surprising for an agency that spends like a drunken sailor on payday.
Thegweni is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2011, 10:52 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: YVR
Programs: AC 75K
Posts: 828
Eight.Billion.Dollars.


Every year, for this crap.
Air Koryo is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2011, 11:20 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Programs: WN A++, Marriott Plat, Avis 1
Posts: 217
Idea: How about they put to work all those TSOs wandering or standing around and actually get them screening people?

That probably wouldn't work tho... Makes too much sense.
VegasCableGuy is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2011, 11:23 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: IAD
Programs: *wood Gold
Posts: 1,781
Originally Posted by VegasCableGuy
Idea: How about they put to work all those TSOs wandering or standing around and actually get them screening people?
Since their screening methods are useless and benign at best, and violative of civil rights at worst I'd recommend not putting them to work doing this.

A far, far, far better solution is also the cheapest and simplest - lay them off. Quit wasting taxpayer money on an organization that is unnecessary, ineffective, intrusive, and un-American.
clrankin is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2011, 1:26 pm
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Finally back in Boston after escaping from New York
Posts: 13,644
I'm thinking that they could ask for donations. That way, all the people who say, "anything for security" will have a chance to put up or shut up.

Mike
mikeef is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2011, 3:33 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: in the sky
Posts: 490
Originally Posted by mikeef
I'm thinking that they could ask for donations. That way, all the people who say, "anything for security" will have a chance to put up or shut up.
Now THAT is a wonderful idea!

I suppose they could also hold bake sales on the sterile side.. y'know, cupcakes and pies and such...
loops is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2011, 4:29 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,004
Originally Posted by loops
Now THAT is a wonderful idea!

I suppose they could also hold bake sales on the sterile side.. y'know, cupcakes and pies and such...
Or they could charge for the pat-down....
IslandBased is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2011, 4:56 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: in the sky
Posts: 490
Originally Posted by IslandBased
Or they could charge for the pat-down....
Perhaps a special deal for the "full monty"... pat-down, luggage search, wallet inspection, extra slow swabbing of every item proferred... to feel uhm... extra special safe.

loops is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2011, 5:07 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Petaluma, CA, USA
Programs: DL FO MM,
Posts: 102
Originally Posted by Thegweni
Not surprising for an agency that spends like a drunken sailor on payday.
That's not really fair to drunken sailors, now is it? After all they (the drunken sailors) earned it, they can spend it as they see fit, no? <attempt at humor>
guloxi is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2011, 6:35 pm
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: BOS/ORH
Programs: AS 75K
Posts: 18,323
Which is probably why the pay to be a trusted traveler program is coming out
CDKing is offline  
Old Oct 12, 2011, 7:22 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Arizona
Programs: Star Alliance - chairman, HH - Diamond, Marriott - Platinum, TSA - Dog Dung.
Posts: 140
Originally Posted by guloxi
That's not really fair to drunken sailors, now is it? After all they (the drunken sailors) earned it, they can spend it as they see fit, no? <attempt at humor>
You are right. I formally apologise to all drunken sailors.
Thegweni is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.