![]() |
Empty magazines and the checkpoint
OK, quick question for all you folks...
If I were to bring an empty, completely unloaded AR mag through the checkpoint, what kind of a kerfuffle would this set off? Keep in mind - no firearm, no bullets - just the mag. I've got a number of 30 round mags for one of my rifles that are marked "Law Enforcement Only" and was thinking about how much fun it would be to have TSA try to claim that this was a problem and confiscate it from me. The D-Y-W-T-F-T threat would be useless on me then, because I'd purchase a fully refundable ticket with the intent of not going anywhere - just getting through the checkpoint and requesting a refund. To make matters more fun, this would likely be a ticket purchased last-minute, and I'd be flying with a VERY small carry-on (think just a laptop bag) and no checked luggage. |
Wouldn't this be considered a part of a weapon?
|
Originally Posted by Loren Pechtel
(Post 16778924)
Wouldn't this be considered a part of a weapon?
|
Originally Posted by chollie
(Post 16778948)
I'm sure it would be. Harmless by itself, but could be combined with other items beyond the checkpoint to become a threat.
|
Originally Posted by clrankin
(Post 16778809)
OK, quick question for all you folks...
If I were to bring an empty, completely unloaded AR mag through the checkpoint, what kind of a kerfuffle would this set off? Keep in mind - no firearm, no bullets - just the mag. I've got a number of 30 round mags for one of my rifles that are marked "Law Enforcement Only" and was thinking about how much fun it would be to have TSA try to claim that this was a problem and confiscate it from me. The D-Y-W-T-F-T threat would be useless on me then, because I'd purchase a fully refundable ticket with the intent of not going anywhere - just getting through the checkpoint and requesting a refund. To make matters more fun, this would likely be a ticket purchased last-minute, and I'd be flying with a VERY small carry-on (think just a laptop bag) and no checked luggage. Lol do it if you wish. ;) TSA wouldn't try and claim it was a problem - it would be a problem, and the police would be involved. And refundable ticket? Yeah, you will get your money back on that - but you might be fined by TSA regulatory, and if so, you will not get your money back from that. Tell you what, do it and let us know what happens. Thanks! |
Originally Posted by SATTSO
(Post 16779024)
And refundable ticket? Yeah, you will get your money back on that - but you might be fined by TSA regulatory, and if so, you will not get your money back from that.
Tell you what, do it and let us know what happens. Thanks! |
If they are firearms parts, it may be a problem.
Traveling with Special Items Firearms & Ammunition Photo of a firearm improperly packaged Photo of a firearm improperly packaged. You may only transport firearms, ammunition and firearm parts in your checked baggage. Firearms, ammunition and firearm parts are prohibited from carry-on baggage. Failure to adhere to the following regulations will preclude passengers from traveling with firearms, ammunitions or firearm parts: * Travelers must declare all firearms, ammunition, and parts to the airline during the ticket counter check-in process. * The firearm must be unloaded. * The firearm must be in a hard-sided container. * The container must be locked. A locked container is defined as one that completely secures the firearm from being accessed. Cases that can be pulled open with little effort cannot be brought aboard the aircraft. Federal regulations prohibit unlocked gun cases (or cases with broken locks) on aircraft. * TSA inspects all firearm cases at the ticket counter. Travelers should remain in the area designated by the aircraft operator or TSA representative to take the key back after the container is cleared for transportation. If travelers are not present and the security officer must open the container, TSA or the airline will make a reasonable attempt to contact the owner. If contact is not made, the container will not be placed on the aircraft. * Travelers must securely pack any ammunition in fiber (such as cardboard), wood or metal boxes or other packaging that is specifically designed to carry small amounts of ammunition. * Travelers may not use firearm magazines/clips for packing ammunition unless they completely and securely enclose the ammunition (e.g., by securely covering the exposed portions of the magazine or by securely placing the magazine in a pouch, holder, holster or lanyard). * Ammunition may be carried in the same hard-sided case as the firearm, as long as it follows packing guidelines described above. * TSA prohibits black powder or percussion caps used with black-powder. These regulations are strictly enforced. Violations can result in criminal prosecution and civil penalties of up to $10,000 per violation. Airlines may have additional requirements for traveling with firearms and ammunition. Therefore, travelers should also contact the airline regarding firearm and ammunition carriage policies. |
Originally Posted by InkUnderNails
(Post 16779073)
If they are firearms parts, it may be a problem.
|
Originally Posted by celticwhisper
(Post 16779036)
To date, nobody has received a Terrorists Searching Americans regulatory fine.
The above quote is not a helpful response. You are a civil servant whose salary is paid by our tax dollars. Start obeying. Protests to this statement will be ignored. You are correct, no one has received a "Terrorist Searching Americans regulatory fine" (make that one up all by yourself? If so, you deserve a gold star sticker and a pat on the head!). However, many have received regulatory fines from TSA. Further, as Ink has demonstrated ^ , the information regarding the transportation of firearm parts is easily accessible to the public. But if someone chooses to make a "I dare you" type of threat/gamble to the TSA, I feel no sympathy for them when and if fined. |
Originally Posted by SATTSO
(Post 16779268)
Further, as Ink has demonstrated ^ , the information regarding the transportation of firearm parts is easily accessible to the public.
Of course, it's a free country, and a free message board, so ... act as you wish. |
Originally Posted by SATTSO
(Post 16779268)
LMAO :D
You are correct, no one has received a "Terrorist Searching Americans regulatory fine" (make that one up all by yourself? If so, you deserve a gold star sticker and a pat on the head!). However, many have received regulatory fines from TSA. Further, as Ink has demonstrated ^ , the information regarding the transportation of firearm parts is easily accessible to the public. But if someone chooses to make a "I dare you" type of threat/gamble to the TSA, I feel no sympathy for them when and if fined. Yes I found it on your web site. But, as far as I may know, it could be out of date. :p Here is a grand bargain for all of our resident TSA folks. We will read the web site and follow published guidelines. You and your fellow employees should do the same. (Hints: NEXUS, keeping luggage in sight, asking names at TDC, etc.) |
Originally Posted by InkUnderNails
(Post 16779320)
I feel a bit uncomfortable here.
Yes I found it on your web site. But, as far as I may know, it could be out of date. :p Here is a grand bargain for all of our resident TSA folks. We will read the web site and follow published guidelines. You and your fellow employees should do the same. (Hints: NEXUS, keeping luggage in sight, asking names at TDC, etc.) |
Originally Posted by jkhuggins
(Post 16779303)
And, of course, as a public servant, you could have helpfully pointed the OP to that same public information. Instead, of course, you chose to simply say "it will be a problem" without offering any explanation as to why --- leaving people like me to wonder if your statement was based in policy or yet another unsubstantiated claim by a TSA representative.
Of course, it's a free country, and a free message board, so ... act as you wish. Or to put it this way, if I see someone grab a hammer, and say they are going to smash their toes, I will not try to argue with them, other than to say "you might not like doing that". I will not go into detail as to why. If someone wishes to do something so stupid, that is up to them. As you say, its a free country, so heck, I'll let him do as he wishes. But you also know from my record here that when someone has an honest question, I try my best to answer (if I am on the site at that time). People may not like my answer, but I do try to answer honest questions. ;) |
Originally Posted by InkUnderNails
(Post 16779320)
I feel a bit uncomfortable here.
Yes I found it on your web site. But, as far as I may know, it could be out of date. :p Here is a grand bargain for all of our resident TSA folks. We will read the web site and follow published guidelines. You and your fellow employees should do the same. (Hints: NEXUS, keeping luggage in sight, asking names at TDC, etc.) |
Originally Posted by SATTSO
(Post 16779351)
I will help out those who sincerely ask for it. However, what the OP did was not sincere; it was not honest.
Answering a question in a public forum isn't just about the person who asked the question; it also informs (or fails to inform) everyone else watching the conversation. The attitude you display in your response colors their reactions, too ... not just that of the OP. But now that I have my answer, I guess I'll bow out and let the petty bickering continue. As you were, everyone. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:16 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.