TSA says knives "not a threat"
Jul 18, 2011, 9:34 am
#31
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,728
Jul 18, 2011, 9:48 am
#32
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,972
But the issue isn't whether it's possible or not, but how likely it is. The "it might be possible" route is the one that leads to cavity searches.
Jul 18, 2011, 11:49 am
#33
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 642
Because there's not a shred of evidence that terrorist groups, unlike national intelligence groups, have the capability to have "sleeper agents".
But the issue isn't whether it's possible or not, but how likely it is. The "it might be possible" route is the one that leads to cavity searches.
But the issue isn't whether it's possible or not, but how likely it is. The "it might be possible" route is the one that leads to cavity searches.
Jul 18, 2011, 12:02 pm
#34
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 1,007
Because there's not a shred of evidence that terrorist groups, unlike national intelligence groups, have the capability to have "sleeper agents".
But the issue isn't whether it's possible or not, but how likely it is. The "it might be possible" route is the one that leads to cavity searches.
But the issue isn't whether it's possible or not, but how likely it is. The "it might be possible" route is the one that leads to cavity searches.
Jul 18, 2011, 12:16 pm
#35
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Seattle
Programs: Hyatt, Marriott, Delta, Alaska
Posts: 636
I have already prepared a mental list of all of the "legal" items in my carryon that could be used with greater effect as weapons than my little 2" swiss army pocket knife, should a TSA officer ever ask. Frankly, I think the smart ones and ex-military would probably agree with me, even as they enforced a rule they know to be silly.
Jul 18, 2011, 12:27 pm
#36
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,083
Because there's not a shred of evidence that terrorist groups, unlike national intelligence groups, have the capability to have "sleeper agents".
But the issue isn't whether it's possible or not, but how likely it is. The "it might be possible" route is the one that leads to cavity searches.
But the issue isn't whether it's possible or not, but how likely it is. The "it might be possible" route is the one that leads to cavity searches.
Jul 18, 2011, 2:17 pm
#37
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,728
Jul 18, 2011, 2:25 pm
#39
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,728
I'm quite sure that the federal employees at Manzanar, Rohwer, and Tule Lake were all just feeding their families, too - it doesn't make what they did any more palatable.