US: Terrorists look to implant bombs in humans
#16
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,728
Anyone else noticed that any time the TSA loses face, another implausible threat comes up for them to focus on?
#17
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 454
This isn't science fiction. This was used a couple of years ago. Not on an airline, but a guy with a bomb inside him went into a secured compound. He made it through security. He even hung out with his victims for a while and drank and ate with them. Then he set himself off. Does this have me more concerned about flying? Nope. The TSA has always been more about warm fuzzies than actual security. It doesn't change a thing.
#18
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: North of DFW
Programs: AA PLT, HH Gold, TSA Disparager Gold, going for Platnium
Posts: 1,535
This isn't science fiction. This was used a couple of years ago. Not on an airline, but a guy with a bomb inside him went into a secured compound. He made it through security. He even hung out with his victims for a while and drank and ate with them. Then he set himself off. Does this have me more concerned about flying? Nope. The TSA has always been more about warm fuzzies than actual security. It doesn't change a thing.
hmmm is "No specific Threat" = No threat were just making things up to keep our budget fluffed. This should be interesting to watch as i think finally were gonna see a blue shirt get the tar beaten out of them for there actions.
Time to write the domed idiots again.
#19
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ATL Lost Luggage
Programs: Kettle with Kryptonium Medallion Tags
Posts: 10,274
That was an assassination attempt, that failed.
FWIW, I'm pretty confident that you cannot possibly pack enough explosives, inside a living body, to take down a plane. (Remember, if those explosives are in a person, then the explosives cannot really be placed where they would do the most damage to a plane.)
FWIW, I'm pretty confident that you cannot possibly pack enough explosives, inside a living body, to take down a plane. (Remember, if those explosives are in a person, then the explosives cannot really be placed where they would do the most damage to a plane.)
#20
Join Date: Mar 2007
Programs: AA 1MM
Posts: 3,182
Let's say the NOS could perform a "virtual" cavity search, how would they distinguish between a plastic explosive and the "other" kind of explosive sometimes carried in a body cavity? Let's be honest, has anyone not ever had one "on deck" and said "I'm running late, I'll just handle it at the airport"?
#21
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: EWR
Programs: AA, Delta, NWA,HHonors, Hyatt BF
Posts: 1,762
Because the bad guys know where they're more likely to penetrate?
Perhaps the stereotypical demographic audience at monster truck shows is more likely to profile their fellow attendees and be more suspicious of the stereotypical demographic terrorist? They certainly wouldn't look twice at 95 YO grandmas in wheelchairs.
Perhaps the stereotypical demographic audience at monster truck shows is more likely to profile their fellow attendees and be more suspicious of the stereotypical demographic terrorist? They certainly wouldn't look twice at 95 YO grandmas in wheelchairs.
Why would they be more likely to penetrate the security of an airport than the security of a mall or sporting event? I would think if I were intent on causing as much "terror" as possible I would go for a target that the most people would personalize (like an office building or mall or sporting event) with the highest death toll and with the easiest access. A plane is a good tool to cause a high death toll but you need to get into the cockpit to control it. Not so do-able anymore. Just my opinion
#23
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,082
Yes, yes. And MANPADS around the airport perimeter. And anthrax in the artificial sweetener packets. And poison chicken from the catering kitchen. And snakes in the ventilation ducts.
All threats that would not cause any reasonable person to lose sleep.
But which keep excessively-paranoid DHS staffers up all night figuring ways to spend billions of dollars to protect the populace against hundreds of tiny risks.
All threats that would not cause any reasonable person to lose sleep.
But which keep excessively-paranoid DHS staffers up all night figuring ways to spend billions of dollars to protect the populace against hundreds of tiny risks.
#24
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: AA, WN RR
Posts: 3,122
that was the saudi prince butt bomb. still would have never been found by TSA.
hmmm is "No specific Threat" = No threat were just making things up to keep our budget fluffed. This should be interesting to watch as i think finally were gonna see a blue shirt get the tar beaten out of them for there actions.
Time to write the domed idiots again.
hmmm is "No specific Threat" = No threat were just making things up to keep our budget fluffed. This should be interesting to watch as i think finally were gonna see a blue shirt get the tar beaten out of them for there actions.
Time to write the domed idiots again.
Once again, Americans on domestic flights are going to be subjected to unconstitutional searches because of the activities of foreign terrorists. This is intolerable. The timing of this article, just 2 days after we celebrated Independence Day and the public announcement of the signing of the Declaration of Independence 235 years ago, is ironic.
#25
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Up in the air far too often.
Programs: Star Gold
Posts: 354
That was an assassination attempt, that failed.
FWIW, I'm pretty confident that you cannot possibly pack enough explosives, inside a living body, to take down a plane. (Remember, if those explosives are in a person, then the explosives cannot really be placed where they would do the most damage to a plane.)
FWIW, I'm pretty confident that you cannot possibly pack enough explosives, inside a living body, to take down a plane. (Remember, if those explosives are in a person, then the explosives cannot really be placed where they would do the most damage to a plane.)
This is a nice essay addressing that issue:
http://thetravelinsider.info/securit...explosives.htm
This is a strong argument *against* the make-work and sexual harassment program that was formed, which never could detect this threat.
Interestingly as a few others have pointed out, the metal detectors are much BETTER than the body scanners for this threat. You have no hope of detecting 8 oz of PETN in somebody's rectum or in a soft surgical implant, or between their toes as they walk through the radiation scanner. You DO have a hope of detecting a metal detonator on somebody's body using a WTMD, or detecting modified electronics or a detonator pattern using an Xray.
#27
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Arizona
Programs: AA, WN
Posts: 161
Maybe this latest development will hasten the arrival so called "checkpoint of the future" that was mentioned recently in newspapers and magazines.
http://business.blogs.cnn.com/2011/0...port-pat-down/
If someone could create these scanning tunnels to be highly sophisticated at detecting implanted and hidden explosives, while emitting minimal or no radiation, then it's a positive for passengers concerned about radiation and being patted down.
http://business.blogs.cnn.com/2011/0...port-pat-down/
If someone could create these scanning tunnels to be highly sophisticated at detecting implanted and hidden explosives, while emitting minimal or no radiation, then it's a positive for passengers concerned about radiation and being patted down.
#28
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: PDX
Programs: TSA Refusenik charter member
Posts: 15,978
Methinks a sardonic FTer trotted this one out ages ago and the meme just now made its way inside the U.S. intelligence community.
#29
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,967
Why would they be more likely to penetrate the security of an airport than the security of a mall or sporting event? I would think if I were intent on causing as much "terror" as possible I would go for a target that the most people would personalize (like an office building or mall or sporting event) with the highest death toll and with the easiest access. A plane is a good tool to cause a high death toll but you need to get into the cockpit to control it. Not so do-able anymore. Just my opinion
There was work being done on several regional rail lines. It was the hottest day and the hottest day anywhere in Europe that day. There was a large Neo Nazi march planned. There was a large counter rally planned. The rail station sits next to one of the great landmarks of Europe, filled with tourists from around the world. Streets were blocked off into the city centre and traffic was at a standstill. A major Autobahn was closed down due to demolition works.
In the end, nothing out of the ordinary happened. The anti-Neo Nazi marchers had a mass for peace. Some of they laid down on the rail lines to prevent many of the Neo Nazis from making it into town. It ended up being a busy Saturday on a very hot day.
But that setting would have been ideal and yet it seems that so much focus is placed on airports and airplanes. (In my scenario above, there were many times more police than usual, with duty brought in from surrounding towns, and more presence inside the station and outside the station. But it was still friendly and professional)
#30
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180