Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

US: Terrorists look to implant bombs in humans

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

US: Terrorists look to implant bombs in humans

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 6, 2011, 10:38 am
  #16  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,728
Originally Posted by nachtnebel
TSA has shot its wad on a stupid application of invasive searches. Already the media has turned on them. If they escalate in any way, in frequency of gropes or invasiveness, it will be fun to watch the reaction.
Anyone else noticed that any time the TSA loses face, another implausible threat comes up for them to focus on?
Caradoc is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2011, 11:06 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 454
This isn't science fiction. This was used a couple of years ago. Not on an airline, but a guy with a bomb inside him went into a secured compound. He made it through security. He even hung out with his victims for a while and drank and ate with them. Then he set himself off. Does this have me more concerned about flying? Nope. The TSA has always been more about warm fuzzies than actual security. It doesn't change a thing.
travfar is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2011, 11:18 am
  #18  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: North of DFW
Programs: AA PLT, HH Gold, TSA Disparager Gold, going for Platnium
Posts: 1,535
Originally Posted by travfar
This isn't science fiction. This was used a couple of years ago. Not on an airline, but a guy with a bomb inside him went into a secured compound. He made it through security. He even hung out with his victims for a while and drank and ate with them. Then he set himself off. Does this have me more concerned about flying? Nope. The TSA has always been more about warm fuzzies than actual security. It doesn't change a thing.
that was the saudi prince butt bomb. still would have never been found by TSA.


hmmm is "No specific Threat" = No threat were just making things up to keep our budget fluffed. This should be interesting to watch as i think finally were gonna see a blue shirt get the tar beaten out of them for there actions.

Time to write the domed idiots again.
Scubatooth is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2011, 11:22 am
  #19  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ATL Lost Luggage
Programs: Kettle with Kryptonium Medallion Tags
Posts: 10,274
Originally Posted by travfar
This isn't science fiction. This was used a couple of years ago.
That was an assassination attempt, that failed.

FWIW, I'm pretty confident that you cannot possibly pack enough explosives, inside a living body, to take down a plane. (Remember, if those explosives are in a person, then the explosives cannot really be placed where they would do the most damage to a plane.)
RatherBeOnATrain is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2011, 11:31 am
  #20  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Programs: AA 1MM
Posts: 3,182
Let's say the NOS could perform a "virtual" cavity search, how would they distinguish between a plastic explosive and the "other" kind of explosive sometimes carried in a body cavity? Let's be honest, has anyone not ever had one "on deck" and said "I'm running late, I'll just handle it at the airport"?
JumboD is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2011, 11:35 am
  #21  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: EWR
Programs: AA, Delta, NWA,HHonors, Hyatt BF
Posts: 1,762
Originally Posted by TheRoadie
Because the bad guys know where they're more likely to penetrate?

Perhaps the stereotypical demographic audience at monster truck shows is more likely to profile their fellow attendees and be more suspicious of the stereotypical demographic terrorist? They certainly wouldn't look twice at 95 YO grandmas in wheelchairs.
Especially in MONSTER wheelchairs. ^

Why would they be more likely to penetrate the security of an airport than the security of a mall or sporting event? I would think if I were intent on causing as much "terror" as possible I would go for a target that the most people would personalize (like an office building or mall or sporting event) with the highest death toll and with the easiest access. A plane is a good tool to cause a high death toll but you need to get into the cockpit to control it. Not so do-able anymore. Just my opinion
redreeper is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2011, 11:37 am
  #22  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NY
Programs: JetBlue TrueBlue, US Air Dividend Miles
Posts: 412
Is anyone surprised? It was just a matter of time before TSA trotted this one out.
Cookie Jarvis is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2011, 11:49 am
  #23  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,082
Originally Posted by TheRoadie
Yes, yes. And MANPADS around the airport perimeter. And anthrax in the artificial sweetener packets. And poison chicken from the catering kitchen. And snakes in the ventilation ducts.

All threats that would not cause any reasonable person to lose sleep.

But which keep excessively-paranoid DHS staffers up all night figuring ways to spend billions of dollars to protect the populace against hundreds of tiny risks.
Not so sure that the catering kitchen chicken doesn't already deserve a hazardous label.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2011, 11:52 am
  #24  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: AA, WN RR
Posts: 3,122
Originally Posted by Scubatooth
that was the saudi prince butt bomb. still would have never been found by TSA.


hmmm is "No specific Threat" = No threat were just making things up to keep our budget fluffed. This should be interesting to watch as i think finally were gonna see a blue shirt get the tar beaten out of them for there actions.

Time to write the domed idiots again.
This response to an earlier post alludes to a crucial fact in the article on msn.com, that foreign terrorists have discussed using implanted explosives. Let me repeat that phrase, foreign terrorists. Just like "Richard Reid", the notorious shoe bomber, was not an American, and just like the Christmas Day underwear bomber was not an American, the terrorists allegedly chatting about using implanted explosives are not Americans in the United States. The first line of the article on msn.com reports that the feds have "told overseas airlines that fly into this country" (query: does that definition include Delta, United, or American Airlines) about this alleged threat.

Once again, Americans on domestic flights are going to be subjected to unconstitutional searches because of the activities of foreign terrorists. This is intolerable. The timing of this article, just 2 days after we celebrated Independence Day and the public announcement of the signing of the Declaration of Independence 235 years ago, is ironic.
PatrickHenry1775 is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2011, 11:55 am
  #25  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Up in the air far too often.
Programs: Star Gold
Posts: 354
Originally Posted by RatherBeOnATrain
That was an assassination attempt, that failed.

FWIW, I'm pretty confident that you cannot possibly pack enough explosives, inside a living body, to take down a plane. (Remember, if those explosives are in a person, then the explosives cannot really be placed where they would do the most damage to a plane.)
No, your statement is almost certainly *untrue* - modern explosives are extremely energy dense, and essentially all you need to do is destroy the integrity of the plane. Most estimates are only in the 2 oz range of high energy explosive needed, and even accounting for the body's insulation (if person does not excrete it first) the amount could easily fit inside somebody.

This is a nice essay addressing that issue:
http://thetravelinsider.info/securit...explosives.htm

This is a strong argument *against* the make-work and sexual harassment program that was formed, which never could detect this threat.

Interestingly as a few others have pointed out, the metal detectors are much BETTER than the body scanners for this threat. You have no hope of detecting 8 oz of PETN in somebody's rectum or in a soft surgical implant, or between their toes as they walk through the radiation scanner. You DO have a hope of detecting a metal detonator on somebody's body using a WTMD, or detecting modified electronics or a detonator pattern using an Xray.
cardiomd is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2011, 11:58 am
  #26  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Department of Homeland Sincerity
Programs: WN Platinum
Posts: 12,085
Simple solution, let's ban people from airplanes.

Problem solved.
UALOneKPlus is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2011, 12:43 pm
  #27  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Arizona
Programs: AA, WN
Posts: 161
Maybe this latest development will hasten the arrival so called "checkpoint of the future" that was mentioned recently in newspapers and magazines.

http://business.blogs.cnn.com/2011/0...port-pat-down/

If someone could create these scanning tunnels to be highly sophisticated at detecting implanted and hidden explosives, while emitting minimal or no radiation, then it's a positive for passengers concerned about radiation and being patted down.
Vitaforce is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2011, 12:50 pm
  #28  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: PDX
Programs: TSA Refusenik charter member
Posts: 15,978
Originally Posted by Caradoc
Anyone else noticed that any time the TSA loses face, another implausible threat comes up for them to focus on?
Seven years and counting this forum has existed so I doubt it has escaped anyone's notice.
Originally Posted by Cookie Jarvis
Is anyone surprised? It was just a matter of time before TSA trotted this one out.
Methinks a sardonic FTer trotted this one out ages ago and the meme just now made its way inside the U.S. intelligence community.
essxjay is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2011, 1:08 pm
  #29  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,967
Originally Posted by redreeper
Why would they be more likely to penetrate the security of an airport than the security of a mall or sporting event? I would think if I were intent on causing as much "terror" as possible I would go for a target that the most people would personalize (like an office building or mall or sporting event) with the highest death toll and with the easiest access. A plane is a good tool to cause a high death toll but you need to get into the cockpit to control it. Not so do-able anymore. Just my opinion
A few weeks ago I was at one of the busiest rail stations in Europe. It was heaving; I have never seen it that busy.

There was work being done on several regional rail lines. It was the hottest day and the hottest day anywhere in Europe that day. There was a large Neo Nazi march planned. There was a large counter rally planned. The rail station sits next to one of the great landmarks of Europe, filled with tourists from around the world. Streets were blocked off into the city centre and traffic was at a standstill. A major Autobahn was closed down due to demolition works.

In the end, nothing out of the ordinary happened. The anti-Neo Nazi marchers had a mass for peace. Some of they laid down on the rail lines to prevent many of the Neo Nazis from making it into town. It ended up being a busy Saturday on a very hot day.

But that setting would have been ideal and yet it seems that so much focus is placed on airports and airplanes. (In my scenario above, there were many times more police than usual, with duty brought in from surrounding towns, and more presence inside the station and outside the station. But it was still friendly and professional)
exbayern is offline  
Old Jul 6, 2011, 1:36 pm
  #30  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Originally Posted by Mabuk dan gila
Someone needs to start a rumor that terrorists disguised as TSA agents are attempting to smuggle bombs into airports by hiding them in their body cavities.
^^^^
Superguy is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.