![]() |
Originally Posted by raehl311
(Post 14586155)
Questioning someone engaging in behavior that is irregular for normal people but probably(sic) for would-be terrorists,
They aren't and don't need to; simple observation is enough, not to mention google. Would writing in a notebook raise your 'suspicions' as well ? Photography is not terrorism. |
Originally Posted by raehl311
(Post 14585650)
It sounds to me like OP is one of those folks who runs around pushing the limits of his rights without applying some common sense.
Originally Posted by raehl311
(Post 14586130)
That's the whole point. Taking pictures of things that normal people wouldn't take pictures of could be a precursor to criminal activity. I'd much rather have our law enforcement identifying and investigating behavior that indicates potential criminal activity than making me throw out my bottle of water before I can go into the airport.
|
Walking along the sidewalk in front of a bank could be a precursor to criminal activity too, should we shakedown every pedestrian on the sidewalk? Firing the synapses in your brain could be a precursor to criminal activity, should we shakedown everyone who has a brain?
|
Originally Posted by raehl311
(Post 14585650)
Personally, I'm GLAD the TSA agents and the HPD followed up on this. If they're not going to follow up on people hanging around at airports taking pictures of things that would appear to be entirely uninteresting except for security implications, who ARE they going to follow up on?
Originally Posted by eastport
(Post 14586312)
That's absurd.
This isn't a secret military installation from WWII, where the equipment, strength and unit numbers might help the enemy. This is a public facility that anyone can visit in person. . http://strandedmariner.files.wordpre...ear-bunker.jpg |
Originally Posted by raehl311
(Post 14586130)
Thanks. I definitely choose to live my life in a way that:
1) Is not rude to others 2) Doesn't cause me to spend hours detained at airports |
Originally Posted by DIFIN
(Post 14587021)
you would have been right at home in Nazi Germany, too bad you missed out:confused:
|
Originally Posted by raehl311
(Post 14587335)
Yeap, any day now we'll be sending people who take pictures of TSA agents and don't answer questions to the showers. Totally comparable.
Bruce |
Originally Posted by PhoenixRev
(Post 14587860)
You are not the arbiter of what is and what is not acceptable or normal.
Neither is the TSA. Or anyone else for that matter. |
Originally Posted by raehl311
(Post 14586130)
That's the whole point. Taking pictures of things that normal people wouldn't take pictures of could be a precursor to criminal activity. I'd much rather have our law enforcement identifying and investigating behavior that indicates potential criminal activity than making me throw out my bottle of water before I can go into the airport.
Originally Posted by raehl311
(Post 14586130)
It's the difference between investigating someone who just blew up a federal building and investigating someone who just acquired a bunch of fertilizer and doesn't have a farm.
Law enforcement's job is to investigate crimes and catch criminals after they have done something illegal-- not before. By doing what they did, TSA and HPD were far out of line. Though lawsuits probably aren't going to happen in this situation, I really wish they would. I'd like to see the thug screeners and jack boot cops be made to pay for their harassment personally. It would be great to see them and their families lose their car, home, and savings and be thrown out on the street as the result of blatent disregard for Rights and Liberties. It may sound harsh, but I'll bet if examples were made of a few thugs it would cause a number of others to think twice before doing something that might exceed their authority. I'd prefer to have a society with police, TSA, FBI, NSA, and others put on short leashes and spanked-- hard and publically-- when they exceed their authority and trample the Bill of Rights.
Originally Posted by raehl311
(Post 14586130)
Questioning someone engaging in behavior that is irregular for normal people but probably for would-be terrorists, especially when that someone is making a point of not giving you information that would explain who they are and what they are doing, well, that's just plain common sense.
|
Originally Posted by raehl311
(Post 14586130)
That's the whole point. Taking pictures of things that normal people wouldn't take pictures of could be a precursor to criminal activity....
|
Originally Posted by benblaney
(Post 14588151)
That's not the issue. The issue is how the the TSA and HPD behaved *after* it became apparent that the OP was not any kind of threat, just an air-travel nerd.
|
Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much
(Post 14591079)
When I ride the MARC train home at night, I often see train buffs with their cameras standing on station platforms taking pictures and noting locomotive numbers and such. This would be considered a terrorist act in some professional circles.
|
Originally Posted by IslandBased
(Post 14591139)
And they may have recreated whole rail lines in miniature in their basements to practice on, under the guise of being hobbyists.:eek:
|
Originally Posted by N965VJ
(Post 14591273)
I find this very disturbing, as these could be dioramas used for a dry run of choo-choo mayhem. Oh noes! :p
|
Originally Posted by IslandBased
(Post 14591289)
Quick, round up the rail and R/C hobbyists, they are a dire threat.:rolleyes:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 4:49 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.