Full-body scans of passengers to start at Sea-Tac in September
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Wenatchee, WA
Programs: Lifetime AA Gold-1MM
Posts: 4,909
Full-body scans of passengers to start at Sea-Tac in September
Sea-Tac International Airport passengers will soon begin undergoing full-body scans as the federal government installs equipment that will help identify terrorist threats but poses concerns about privacy, health risks and longer waits in security lines.
. . .
"Every passenger has the option to refuse to go through these," and walk through a metal detector instead, Baird said. Those who do will be subject to a pat-down, a procedure that takes extra time, but one that privacy experts recommend for those who feel uncomfortable.
"People should not just accept this as a foregone conclusion," said Ginger McCall, staff counsel for the Electronic Privacy Information Center in Washington, D.C. Her organization has filed sued to stop the use of body scans, charging they are the equivalent of a digital strip-search.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...canners19.html
. . .
"Every passenger has the option to refuse to go through these," and walk through a metal detector instead, Baird said. Those who do will be subject to a pat-down, a procedure that takes extra time, but one that privacy experts recommend for those who feel uncomfortable.
"People should not just accept this as a foregone conclusion," said Ginger McCall, staff counsel for the Electronic Privacy Information Center in Washington, D.C. Her organization has filed sued to stop the use of body scans, charging they are the equivalent of a digital strip-search.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...canners19.html
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 21,603
That stinks. I was planning a visit to Seattle in October to visit a friend. Now I may reconsider!
#3
Join Date: May 2010
Location: TPA
Programs: All The Programs
Posts: 2,204
They were using them in JAX, too. Fortunately, I wasn't "selected" for it. I would decline the scan - not because of privacy, but because I don't want an unnecessary dose of radiation (or whatever they use).
#4
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: on the path to perdition
Programs: Delta, United
Posts: 4,784
You might as well just go and plan to be hand inspected. At the rate things are going every airport will have them. Though not every terminal - so just choose accordingly if you do not want the aggravation.
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,719
Fortunately, local news-talk radio (KOMO) cited the "growing list of cons" associated with the Nude-o-Scopes as it covered the story today, and aired several critical soundbites. Also, commentary on the Seattle Times online forums was running heavily against the NoS. Maybe we're slowly edging away from blind, dumb acceptance of ridiculous security measures.
#6
Suspended
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
Fortunately, local news-talk radio (KOMO) cited the "growing list of cons" associated with the Nude-o-Scopes as it covered the story today, and aired several critical soundbites. Also, commentary on the Seattle Times online forums was running heavily against the NoS. Maybe we're slowly edging away from blind, dumb acceptance of ridiculous security measures.
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 21,603
+100000000
#8
Join Date: May 2010
Location: FLL - Nice and Warm
Programs: TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 1,025
Right Direction, but they don't have a clue
August 19, 2010
The Honorable John F. Clark
Director
U.S. Marshals Service
U.S. Department of Justice
As you probably are aware, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has employed protocols for the use of AIT that includes a prohibition on the storage or retention of images from whole body imaging scans in most circumstances.
We also encourage you to consider the use of automatic target recognition (ATR) software with all AITs. This auto-detection software addresses many of the privacy concerns raised by the AITs by eliminating the need for a federal security official to view the images generated by scans. ATR is already in use at Schiphol International Airport in Amsterdam and is currently being reviewed by TSA for use in U.S. airports. Computer-based auto-detection technology, which identifies potentially threatening objects on a person using a featureless human body outline to highlight those areas of the individual that may require further inspection, would go a long way to
address the legitimate privacy concerns many Americans have regarding whole body imaging technology.
Joseph I. Lieberman, United States Senator
Susan M. Collins, United States Senator
Daniel H. Akaka, United States Senator
Thomas R. Carper, United States Senator
Saxby Chambliss, United States Senator
Johnny Isakson, United States Senator
http://politechbot.com/docs/lieberma...ing.081910.txt
These bozos don't know about the different technologies?
They seem to think saving images is OK in some cases?
The Honorable John F. Clark
Director
U.S. Marshals Service
U.S. Department of Justice
As you probably are aware, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has employed protocols for the use of AIT that includes a prohibition on the storage or retention of images from whole body imaging scans in most circumstances.
We also encourage you to consider the use of automatic target recognition (ATR) software with all AITs. This auto-detection software addresses many of the privacy concerns raised by the AITs by eliminating the need for a federal security official to view the images generated by scans. ATR is already in use at Schiphol International Airport in Amsterdam and is currently being reviewed by TSA for use in U.S. airports. Computer-based auto-detection technology, which identifies potentially threatening objects on a person using a featureless human body outline to highlight those areas of the individual that may require further inspection, would go a long way to
address the legitimate privacy concerns many Americans have regarding whole body imaging technology.
Joseph I. Lieberman, United States Senator
Susan M. Collins, United States Senator
Daniel H. Akaka, United States Senator
Thomas R. Carper, United States Senator
Saxby Chambliss, United States Senator
Johnny Isakson, United States Senator
http://politechbot.com/docs/lieberma...ing.081910.txt
These bozos don't know about the different technologies?
They seem to think saving images is OK in some cases?
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 21,603
August 19, 2010
The Honorable John F. Clark
Director
U.S. Marshals Service
U.S. Department of Justice
As you probably are aware, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has employed protocols for the use of AIT that includes a prohibition on the storage or retention of images from whole body imaging scans in most circumstances.
We also encourage you to consider the use of automatic target recognition (ATR) software with all AITs. This auto-detection software addresses many of the privacy concerns raised by the AITs by eliminating the need for a federal security official to view the images generated by scans. ATR is already in use at Schiphol International Airport in Amsterdam and is currently being reviewed by TSA for use in U.S. airports. Computer-based auto-detection technology, which identifies potentially threatening objects on a person using a featureless human body outline to highlight those areas of the individual that may require further inspection, would go a long way to
address the legitimate privacy concerns many Americans have regarding whole body imaging technology.
Joseph I. Lieberman, United States Senator
Susan M. Collins, United States Senator
Daniel H. Akaka, United States Senator
Thomas R. Carper, United States Senator
Saxby Chambliss, United States Senator
Johnny Isakson, United States Senator
http://politechbot.com/docs/lieberma...ing.081910.txt
These bozos don't know about the different technologies?
They seem to think saving images is OK in some cases?
The Honorable John F. Clark
Director
U.S. Marshals Service
U.S. Department of Justice
As you probably are aware, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has employed protocols for the use of AIT that includes a prohibition on the storage or retention of images from whole body imaging scans in most circumstances.
We also encourage you to consider the use of automatic target recognition (ATR) software with all AITs. This auto-detection software addresses many of the privacy concerns raised by the AITs by eliminating the need for a federal security official to view the images generated by scans. ATR is already in use at Schiphol International Airport in Amsterdam and is currently being reviewed by TSA for use in U.S. airports. Computer-based auto-detection technology, which identifies potentially threatening objects on a person using a featureless human body outline to highlight those areas of the individual that may require further inspection, would go a long way to
address the legitimate privacy concerns many Americans have regarding whole body imaging technology.
Joseph I. Lieberman, United States Senator
Susan M. Collins, United States Senator
Daniel H. Akaka, United States Senator
Thomas R. Carper, United States Senator
Saxby Chambliss, United States Senator
Johnny Isakson, United States Senator
http://politechbot.com/docs/lieberma...ing.081910.txt
These bozos don't know about the different technologies?
They seem to think saving images is OK in some cases?
#10
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: GNV which is not where we would like to be :)
Programs: ABP, Mr. Mom without the kids, Signor Mucci, DL PM, HH & Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 4,526
Fortunately, local news-talk radio (KOMO) cited the "growing list of cons" associated with the Nude-o-Scopes as it covered the story today, and aired several critical soundbites. Also, commentary on the Seattle Times online forums was running heavily against the NoS. Maybe we're slowly edging away from blind, dumb acceptance of ridiculous security measures.
Didn't the Revolutionary War start with a small vocal minority?
#11
Join Date: May 2006
Location: MYF/CMA/SAN/YYZ/YKF
Programs: COdbaUA 1K MM, AA EXP, Bonbon Gold, GHA Titanium, Hertz PC, NEXUS and GE
Posts: 5,838
In other news:
"People who care about their health, privacy and the Constitution of the United States of America shall shortly begin opting out of dangerous, ineffective full body scans in Seattle."
"People who care about their health, privacy and the Constitution of the United States of America shall shortly begin opting out of dangerous, ineffective full body scans in Seattle."
#12
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SEA/YVR/BLI
Programs: UA "Lifetime" Gold, AS MVPG100K, OW Emerald, HH Lifetime Diamond, IC Plat, Marriott Gold, Hertz Gold
Posts: 9,489
Selfishly I hope that most people aren't "opt-outs," making the line for the, ah, personal contact shorter for us; OTOH I hope everybody opts out.
#13
Moderator, Hilton Honors
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on a short leash
Programs: some
Posts: 71,422
#15
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SEA/YVR/BLI
Programs: UA "Lifetime" Gold, AS MVPG100K, OW Emerald, HH Lifetime Diamond, IC Plat, Marriott Gold, Hertz Gold
Posts: 9,489
^
Yes, and as a geezer I'll get away with loud and cheerful comments while in line, e.g. warning the TSA employees to stay away from these dangerous newfangled contraptions too if they ever want to have children.
Yes, and as a geezer I'll get away with loud and cheerful comments while in line, e.g. warning the TSA employees to stay away from these dangerous newfangled contraptions too if they ever want to have children.