![]() |
Dear DEN TSA Supervisor
If you are going to have a priority line, please staff it with someone who can check people faster than a turtle in December. The regular lanes where 3 for every 1.
Not to mention that somehow a person on my flight got through security with someone elses boarding pass (same last name, but unrelated). Found out when 2 people had the same seat. |
My letter would have read more like one of the pieces of fan mail that Lt. Hauk received in Good Morning, Vietnam.
|
Originally Posted by USAF_Pride
(Post 14427688)
If you are going to have a priority line, please staff it with someone who can check people faster than a turtle in December. The regular lanes where 3 for every 1.
|
Originally Posted by Global_Hi_Flyer
(Post 14427791)
Based solely on my observations at the number of airports I've used, I am of the opinion that this is done deliberately to make the priority lanes move slower.
Originally Posted by Spiff
(Post 14427705)
My letter would have read more like one of the pieces of fan mail that Lt. Hauk received in Good Morning, Vietnam.
|
Originally Posted by star_world
(Post 14427950)
What would be the motivation for that? I think you're giving them too much credit :)
|
Originally Posted by Global_Hi_Flyer
(Post 14427791)
Based solely on my observations at the number of airports I've used, I am of the opinion that this is done deliberately to make the priority lanes move slower.
Originally Posted by star_world
(Post 14427950)
What would be the motivation for that? I think you're giving them too much credit :)
Good for you ^ - keep at it. |
Originally Posted by clrankin
(Post 14428285)
I certainly wouldn't put it past screeners to do this to "elites". As many of them wouldn't be able to enjoy most of the perks that the elites get to begin with, it is quite possible that they do what they can to harass and annoy out of a sense of jealousy.
Originally Posted by Italy98
(Post 14428579)
I see TSA doing this to increase the number of paxs who are driven through the scanners, then then can say "we had X,000 paxs who went through the scanners with 'no objection' as opposed to only y who requested the WTMD. :td: :mad:
|
Originally Posted by clrankin
(Post 14428285)
I certainly wouldn't put it past screeners to do this to "elites". As many of them wouldn't be able to enjoy most of the perks that the elites get to begin with, it is quite possible that they do what they can to harass and annoy out of a sense of jealousy.
Yep. I've seen the Amex Priority Lane in Pearson targetted for full patdowns/secondary searches for everyone in the line. |
Originally Posted by USAF_Pride
(Post 14427688)
If you are going to have a priority line, please staff it with someone who can check people faster than a turtle in December. The regular lanes where 3 for every 1.
Not to mention that somehow a person on my flight got through security with someone elses boarding pass (same last name, but unrelated). Found out when 2 people had the same seat. |
Originally Posted by star_world
(Post 14427950)
What would be the motivation for that? I think you're giving them too much credit :)
Good for you ^ - keep at it.
Originally Posted by clrankin
(Post 14428285)
I certainly wouldn't put it past screeners to do this to "elites". As many of them wouldn't be able to enjoy most of the perks that the elites get to begin with, it is quite possible that they do what they can to harass and annoy out of a sense of jealousy.
Fact: when Clear was operating at IAD the TSA "trainees" were assigned to the Clear/Diamond line. A Supe indicated that it was done because they would be slower to process people than the fully-rated ones that were assigned to the regular lines. |
Originally Posted by Global_Hi_Flyer
(Post 14430446)
Fact: when Clear was operating at IAD the TSA "trainees" were assigned to the Clear/Diamond line. A Supe indicated that it was done because they would be slower to process people than the fully-rated ones that were assigned to the regular lines.
For life. |
BWI C has the hand ETD scanner on the Elite Line. I have observed that C/P over the past few times through BWI and, on each occasion, for every non-elite passenger subjected to the hand inspection, three elites are tested.
|
Originally Posted by Italy98
(Post 14428579)
I see TSA doing this to increase the number of paxs who are driven through the scanners, then then can say "we had X,000 paxs who went through the scanners with 'no objection' as opposed to only y who requested the WTMD. :td: :mad:
However, and getting back to the original topic, screeners, usually a two-striper, are almost always there directing the elite folks to the right....away from the machine. The lane designations always get tossed to the side to keep lines moving (a big problem in Denver). |
Originally Posted by LessO2
(Post 14431179)
In Denver, the machine is almost to the very left. If you go through the elite line, you just walk straight forward to the line with the machine.
However, and getting back to the original topic, screeners, usually a two-striper, are almost always there directing the elite folks to the right....away from the machine. The lane designations always get tossed to the side to keep lines moving (a big problem in Denver). Luckily with DEN, we have the option to move farther to the right, to avoid any experience with the nude-o-scope. In addition, we have Concourse A security, which does not, and hopefully wont get a nude-o-scope! |
Originally Posted by FriendlySkies
(Post 14432919)
Luckily with DEN, we have the option to move farther to the right, to avoid any experience with the nude-o-scope. In addition, we have Concourse A security, which does not, and hopefully wont get a nude-o-scope!
News came out recently that Denver will be getting five more machines in the near future. I'm sure it will be one more at the south checkpoint, two at the north and two in Concourse A. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:01 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.