Flyer “Processed” (Arrested?) in NM After Declining to Show ID
#1771
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: Fallen Plats, ex-WN CP, DYKWIW; still a Hilton Diamond & Club Cholula™ R.I.P. Super Plats
Posts: 25,415
Goggle searches for Robert F Dilley are now zeroing in on this thread. This is hit #5 today:
Keep mentioning full names & use "officer" occasionally.
Very interesting that there were 7 lawsuits against Officer Robert F Dilley. That's an incredibly high number. At that rate a 100-officer department would be fielding ~25 lawsuits a year & nobody would insure them.
There's nothing wrong with Officer Robert F. Dilley's memory. He's just a liar, plain and simple. And he tried to use his lies maliciously ...
Very interesting that there were 7 lawsuits against Officer Robert F Dilley. That's an incredibly high number. At that rate a 100-officer department would be fielding ~25 lawsuits a year & nobody would insure them.
#1773
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,972
Not sure if this contributes anything but I did find this on Dilley from the first quarter of 2005 in the New Mexico District Court - Litigation Department:
Robert F. Dilley and James F. Vautier v. City of Albuquerque and John Doe Insurance Company. Complaint was Breach of Contract and Statutory Duty and Declaratory Relief.
Robert F. Dilley and James F. Vautier v. City of Albuquerque and John Doe Insurance Company. Complaint was Breach of Contract and Statutory Duty and Declaratory Relief.
#1774
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,513
Fair enough. All the lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for New Mexico; the case numbers and case titles are below-- Dilley is a named defendant in each case:
93-CV-01195 Blackhurst v. Albuquerque, City of, et al
94-CV-01016 Cadena v. Albuquerque, City of, et al
94-CV-01279 Taylor, et al v. Vincent, et al
95-CV-00297 Clark v. Montano, et al
95-CV-00984 Padilla, et al v. Dilley, et al
01-CV-00651 Mondragon, et al v. New Mexico, State of, et al
I can't find the 7th case for some reason . . .
#1775
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: PDX
Programs: TSA Refusenik charter member
Posts: 15,978
How bout some charitable reciprocity here? Federal court documents don't quite rise (lower?) to the level of hearsay. A simple PACER or Lex-Nex search should clear up any doubt. (If you don't have a PACER account that's simple enough to fix; if no, Lex-Nex access at work then perhaps you can get remote access via your former university or municipal library.)
I'll bet it is: LINK.
For those unable/unwilling to open an unknown doc file, here are the relevant bits:
For those unable/unwilling to open an unknown doc file, here are the relevant bits:
LEGAL DEPARTMENT QUARTERLY LITIGATION REPORT
January 1, 2006 to March 31, 2006
Case Name: Robert F. Dilley, et al. v. COA, et al.
Type of Suit: Personal Injury
Division/Attorney: Litigation/Michael Garcia
Synopsis of Case: APD employees sued for injuries from car wreck caused by perp despite workers comp claims
Disposition: Dismissed on Motions
Amount Paid by City: --$0--
January 1, 2006 to March 31, 2006
Case Name: Robert F. Dilley, et al. v. COA, et al.
Type of Suit: Personal Injury
Division/Attorney: Litigation/Michael Garcia
Synopsis of Case: APD employees sued for injuries from car wreck caused by perp despite workers comp claims
Disposition: Dismissed on Motions
Amount Paid by City: --$0--
Last edited by essxjay; Feb 3, 2011 at 3:00 pm
#1776
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,439
Can I get an unemoticon? Thanks for the tips.
Thanks for doing that research, Ari, and for pointing any interested parties in the direction of the relevant lawsuits.
It's unfortunate that such legal information is siloed away, outside the public Web. I'll check into RECAP ("Turning PACER around" via Firefox plugin) soon.
#1777
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: PDX
Programs: TSA Refusenik charter member
Posts: 15,978
Web forum text doesn't clearly convey the lack of emotion in my comment. I meant no offense, and made no claim about Ari's credibility. On the contrary, in recent meatspace conversation, I mentioned unsubstantiated rumors that "came from a source who is, in my limited experience with him, seemingly credible."
Thanks for doing that research, Ari, and for pointing any interested parties in the direction of the relevant lawsuits.
It's unfortunate that such legal information is siloed away, outside the public Web. I'll check into RECAP ("Turning PACER around" via Firefox plugin) soon.
Last edited by essxjay; Feb 3, 2011 at 4:57 pm
#1778
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: Fallen Plats, ex-WN CP, DYKWIW; still a Hilton Diamond & Club Cholula™ R.I.P. Super Plats
Posts: 25,415
I guess it's no longer hearsay, (or perhaps only 14% hearsay ):
And this raises another question:
Normally you cannot sue your employer for injuries covered by workers comp. Was Robert F. Dilley trying to scam/shake additional money out of the city?
Fair enough. All the lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for New Mexico; the case numbers and case titles are below-- Dilley is a named defendant in each case:
93-CV-01195 Blackhurst v. Albuquerque, City of, et al
94-CV-01016 Cadena v. Albuquerque, City of, et al
94-CV-01279 Taylor, et al v. Vincent, et al
95-CV-00297 Clark v. Montano, et al
95-CV-00984 Padilla, et al v. Dilley, et al
01-CV-00651 Mondragon, et al v. New Mexico, State of, et al
I can't find the 7th case for some reason . . .
93-CV-01195 Blackhurst v. Albuquerque, City of, et al
94-CV-01016 Cadena v. Albuquerque, City of, et al
94-CV-01279 Taylor, et al v. Vincent, et al
95-CV-00297 Clark v. Montano, et al
95-CV-00984 Padilla, et al v. Dilley, et al
01-CV-00651 Mondragon, et al v. New Mexico, State of, et al
I can't find the 7th case for some reason . . .
... I'll bet it is: LINK.
For those unable/unwilling to open an unknown doc file, here are the relevant bits:
For those unable/unwilling to open an unknown doc file, here are the relevant bits:
LEGAL DEPARTMENT QUARTERLY LITIGATION REPORT
January 1, 2006 to March 31, 2006
Case Name: Robert F. Dilley, et al. v. COA, et al.
Type of Suit: Personal Injury
Division/Attorney: Litigation/Michael Garcia
Synopsis of Case: APD employees sued for injuries from car wreck caused by perp despite workers comp claims
Disposition: Dismissed on Motions
Amount Paid by City: --$0--
January 1, 2006 to March 31, 2006
Case Name: Robert F. Dilley, et al. v. COA, et al.
Type of Suit: Personal Injury
Division/Attorney: Litigation/Michael Garcia
Synopsis of Case: APD employees sued for injuries from car wreck caused by perp despite workers comp claims
Disposition: Dismissed on Motions
Amount Paid by City: --$0--
Last edited by MikeMpls; Feb 3, 2011 at 5:26 pm
#1779
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Francisco, USA
Posts: 79
It's unfortunate that such legal information is siloed away, outside the public Web. I'll check into RECAP ("Turning PACER around" via Firefox plugin) soon.
Otherwise, Federal court documents are $0.08/page through PACER, even though they are public domain.
The San Francisco Public Library has one free PACER terminal in a somewhat obscure downtown branch law library, not the main library. Seattle *might* have a free PACER terminal for library card-holders somewhere.
#1780
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: PDX
Programs: TSA Refusenik charter member
Posts: 15,978
• SCOTUS wiki
• Oyez
• OpenJurist
• Public Library of Law
Googling "alternatives to lexix-nexis" just now I found this page, which looks worth a looksee: Online Legal Research: Beyond LexisNexis & Westlaw.
ETA: I just checked my uni's library page and discovered that for $50/year any member of the public can use those resources, including remote access to online databases e.g. Lex-Nex Academic (plenty for our purposes). Maybe UW or SU offers something similar for less?
Last edited by essxjay; Feb 3, 2011 at 6:54 pm
#1781
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 21,603
Looks like "Blgger Bb" got slapped around, after publishing a b.s. response about Phil's case...
http://washingtontechnology.com/Blog...-comments.aspx
http://washingtontechnology.com/Blog...-comments.aspx
#1782
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: PDX
Programs: TSA Refusenik charter member
Posts: 15,978
And a commenter named Bruce added: "The notion that he was trying to film 'sensitive security information' is absurd. The screener testified that Mocek 'might' have picked up a form containing his own information on the videotape. Is that supposed to be secret? Good grief, you should be ashamed of yourself."
Thu, Feb 3, 2011 Reluctant Flyer
Having lived in the law enforcement and security world, I'm sensitive to the necessity of the mission. However, TSA leadership has done nothing to dispel the rumors or facts related to TSA incompetency. Blog propagandists like Bob do nothing to address the massive integrity and perception gaps between TSA and the flying public. Customer service is abysmal and the attitudes are clearly visible on the faces of many TSA agents. You can do better but not with current leadership, philosophy or methodologies.
Having lived in the law enforcement and security world, I'm sensitive to the necessity of the mission. However, TSA leadership has done nothing to dispel the rumors or facts related to TSA incompetency. Blog propagandists like Bob do nothing to address the massive integrity and perception gaps between TSA and the flying public. Customer service is abysmal and the attitudes are clearly visible on the faces of many TSA agents. You can do better but not with current leadership, philosophy or methodologies.
#1783
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: DFW
Programs: AS, BA, AA
Posts: 3,670
pmocek - Congratulations!! I'm using a snow day to catch up on the 50 pages of the thread I missed; sorry I'm late to the party.
I'm not sure what's more astounding - that someone attempted to delete the images, or that they didn't realize they could be recovered. A failure of our legal system on so many levels, and yet the correct outcome was achieved. ^
Not all of us are as well-informed as you. maradydd offered what appears to be a factual analysis, showing several parallels between Parks and Mocek. Is her comparison incorrect or just offensive? Will you explain why you are offended by the comparison? I'm not trying to be a troll, I just want to understand how something that seems factually true is offensive.
I wouldn't trust that. It says there is only one of me, but I know there are at least two of us, because I have run across her publications.
I'm not sure what's more astounding - that someone attempted to delete the images, or that they didn't realize they could be recovered. A failure of our legal system on so many levels, and yet the correct outcome was achieved. ^
I wouldn't trust that. It says there is only one of me, but I know there are at least two of us, because I have run across her publications.
#1784
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Half the distance to EWR than PHL.
Programs: UA, AA, B6, BA, Hilton, Hyatt, Marriott, IHG, SPG
Posts: 11,695
I hear stories about law suits like officer Dilley's all the time from other officers and town officials. Typically their injuries were caused by not wearing a seat belt so workers comp won't cover injuries from willfull neglect of the department/insurance rules or state law. Once denied they sue the town. Most towns around here use to cave in quickly not wanting the press or the expensive of the suit.
#1785
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Land of ORD
Programs: AA Plat UA Premier
Posts: 9,154
I hear stories about law suits like officer Dilley's all the time from other officers and town officials. Typically their injuries were caused by not wearing a seat belt so workers comp won't cover injuries from willfull neglect of the department/insurance rules or state law. Once denied they sue the town. Most towns around here use to cave in quickly not wanting the press or the expensive of the suit.