Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

Flyer “Processed” (Arrested?) in NM After Declining to Show ID

Flyer “Processed” (Arrested?) in NM After Declining to Show ID

Old Jun 28, 2010, 10:24 pm
  #721  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
Originally Posted by N830MH
Why the trials schedules has been changes? So I didn't notify it yet. Let me know if you have any change new trials date to be set.
This is quite common. Court dockets are full and, when trials run over their estimates, subsequent cases that are calendared for trial have to be moved.
PTravel is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2010, 11:02 pm
  #722  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: AA Gold AAdvantage Elite, Rapids Reward
Posts: 38,294
Originally Posted by PTravel
This is quite common. Court dockets are full and, when trials run over their estimates, subsequent cases that are calendared for trial have to be moved.
I didn't realize know that. Why the dockets is full and there is no more space available for this time. So unfortunately, it was very extremely disappointment for pmocek had no trials date to be set yet. Perhaps if the trials will have to be moved by different cities or state.
N830MH is online now  
Old Jun 29, 2010, 12:18 am
  #723  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
Originally Posted by N830MH
I didn't realize know that. Why the dockets is full and there is no more space available for this time. So unfortunately, it was very extremely disappointment for pmocek had no trials date to be set yet. Perhaps if the trials will have to be moved by different cities or state.
The problem is not so much available courtrooms as it is available judges.
PTravel is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2010, 4:54 am
  #724  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,726
Originally Posted by PTravel
The problem is not so much available courtrooms as it is available judges.
This is why prosecutors try really hard to plea bargain. They really hate proles who insist on jury trials.
n4zhg is offline  
Old Jun 29, 2010, 5:07 am
  #725  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,010
Originally Posted by n4zhg
This is why prosecutors try really hard to plea bargain. They really hate proles who insist on jury trials.
In Phil's case I see no way to make the point without going to trial.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Jul 13, 2010, 1:29 pm
  #726  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,439
State of New Mexico v. Phillip Mocek: trial scheduled for September 8, 2010

Trial date: Wednesday, September 8, 9:00 a.m.
Court: Bernalillo County Metropolitan Court
Case number: CR 25737/09 (For details, go to the court's search page, complete the CAPTCHA, then search for criminal case 2573709)
Judge: Kevin L. Fitzwater
Prosecutor: Julie Gallardo
Defense attorneys: Nancy Hollander, Molly Schmidt-Nowara
Charges:
  1. New Mexico Revised Code 30-20-1: Disorderly conduct
  2. Albuquerque Code of Ordinances 12-2-16: Concealing identity with intent to obstruct
  3. Albuquerque Code of Ordinances 12-2-19: Resisting, obstructing, or refusing to obey a lawful order of a police officer
  4. Albuquerque Code of Ordinances 12-2-3: Criminal trespass
FAQ: (from the Identity Project) http://papersplease.org/wp/mocek/
pmocek is offline  
Old Jul 13, 2010, 2:26 pm
  #727  
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Katoomba (Blue Mountains)
Programs: Mucci
Posts: 8,083
Hi Phil, good luck with it all.

I would like to contribute, but as a (civilian) employee of NSW Police (the state police force here in NSW, a state of Australia - we don't have local police, only state and federal) I cannot have a charge from the Cannabis Defense Coalition appearing on my account. Any other way to donate?

Dave
thadocta is offline  
Old Jul 13, 2010, 2:57 pm
  #728  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,439
mailing address for defense fund donations

Originally Posted by thadocta
I cannot have a charge from the Cannabis Defense Coalition appearing on my account. Any other way to donate?
I believe it would just show up as PayPal, but I'm not sure. Donations can be sent directly to my defense attorney's office:
Phil Mocek legal defense
Freedman Boyd Hollander Goldberg Ives & Duncan PA
20 FIRST PLAZA CTR NW STE 700
ALBUQUERQUE NM 87102-5802
Thanks for your support!
pmocek is offline  
Old Jul 13, 2010, 3:19 pm
  #729  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: IAD
Programs: *wood Gold
Posts: 1,781
Originally Posted by thadocta
Hi Phil, good luck with it all.

I would like to contribute, but as a (civilian) employee of NSW Police (the state police force here in NSW, a state of Australia - we don't have local police, only state and federal) I cannot have a charge from the Cannabis Defense Coalition appearing on my account. Any other way to donate?

Dave
Do the police officers in Australia have their bank accounts routinely examined by their employer without due cause? (I'm not a resident of Australia and am not familiar with your country's laws, so this is really more curiousity than anything else.)

If so, all I can say is wow. Just plain wow. I'd never consent to permit my employer to examine my bank accounts or financial records under any circumstance, up to and including termination. Some things are just meant to be private.
clrankin is offline  
Old Jul 13, 2010, 5:10 pm
  #730  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 57,946
Originally Posted by thadocta
Hi Phil, good luck with it all.

I would like to contribute, but as a (civilian) employee of NSW Police (the state police force here in NSW, a state of Australia - we don't have local police, only state and federal) I cannot have a charge from the Cannabis Defense Coalition appearing on my account. Any other way to donate?

Dave
I'm happy to assist...
Spiff is offline  
Old Jul 13, 2010, 6:07 pm
  #731  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 230
Originally Posted by pmocek
Trial date: Wednesday, September 8, 9:00 a.m.
Court: Bernalillo County Metropolitan Court
Case number: CR 25737/09 (For details, go to the court's search page, complete the CAPTCHA, then search for criminal case 2573709)
Judge: Kevin L. Fitzwater
Prosecutor: Julie Gallardo
Defense attorneys: Nancy Hollander, Molly Schmidt-Nowara
Charges:
  1. New Mexico Revised Code 30-20-1: Disorderly conduct
  2. Albuquerque Code of Ordinances 12-2-16: Concealing identity with intent to obstruct
  3. Albuquerque Code of Ordinances 12-2-19: Resisting, obstructing, or refusing to obey a lawful order of a police officer
  4. Albuquerque Code of Ordinances 12-2-3: Criminal trespass
FAQ: (from the Identity Project) http://papersplease.org/wp/mocek/


Just curious as to who asked for the continuance? The prosecutor or pmocek?
rgfloor is offline  
Old Jul 13, 2010, 6:07 pm
  #732  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: PHX
Programs: UA *Alliance
Posts: 5,570
Originally Posted by clrankin
Do the police officers in Australia have their bank accounts routinely examined by their employer without due cause? (I'm not a resident of Australia and am not familiar with your country's laws, so this is really more curiousity than anything else.)

If so, all I can say is wow. Just plain wow. I'd never consent to permit my employer to examine my bank accounts or financial records under any circumstance, up to and including termination. Some things are just meant to be private.
There are agencies in the US that check the bank accounts of LEOs if they're in specialized units such as narcotics or what CRASH has become at LAPD.

Do you not believe that an employer could subpoena an employee's bank records in the US providing that they show good cause or in case of a lawsuit?
SWCPHX is offline  
Old Jul 13, 2010, 6:18 pm
  #733  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,010
Originally Posted by rgfloor
Just curious as to who asked for the continuance? The prosecutor or pmocek?
I believe if you read earlier posts you will find that the first judge recused them self.
Boggie Dog is offline  
Old Jul 13, 2010, 8:59 pm
  #734  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 230
Originally Posted by essxjay
The events/hearings list has been updated:

Code:
Event Date	Time	Event Type	Judge	Status	Note
07/14/2010	9:00	Jury Trial 	2-Kevin L Fitzwater 	Not Docktd	..
06/14/2010	9:30	Jury Trial 	4-Julie N Altwies 	Continued 	..
06/07/2010	16:51	Judge Removed 	4-Julie N Altwies 	Jdg Reasgn	..
06/07/2010	11:11	Recusal Recvd 	4-Julie N Altwies 	Recusal 	..
06/07/2010	11:11	Order 	4-Julie N Altwies 	Docketed 	Set For Trial
06/07/2010	11:11	Motion Continue	4-Julie N Altwies 	Docketed 	Set For Trial
05/10/2010	9:30	Jury Trial 	4-Julie N Altwies 	Continued 	..
04/20/2010	11:11	Motion Continue	4-Julie N Altwies 	Docketed 	Set For Trial
04/19/2010	15:37	Entry Appearnce	4-Julie N Altwies 	Ent Of App	..
02/05/2010	14:00	Criminal Trial 	4-Julie N Altwies 	Continued 	..
02/01/2010	11:11	Motion Continue	4-Julie N Altwies 	Docketed 	Set For Trial
01/29/2010	15:34	Entry Appearnce	4-Julie N Altwies 	Ent Of App	..
11/16/2009	9:30	Custody Arrain.	8-Judith K Nakamura 	Docketed 	Set For Trial
So apparently the 7/14 date never made the docket.
rgfloor is offline  
Old Jul 14, 2010, 6:31 am
  #735  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Winter Garden, FL
Programs: Delta DM-3MM United Gold-MM Marriott Lifetime Titanium Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 13,498
Originally Posted by SWCPHX
Do you not believe that an employer could subpoena an employee's bank records in the US providing that they show good cause or in case of a lawsuit?
Lawsuit? Sure. Good cause? No way. Employers can't get bank records just by stating a good reason. Absent the employee's consent, the employer would need a court order.

Bruce
bdschobel is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.