Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

Flyer “Processed” (Arrested?) in NM After Declining to Show ID

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Flyer “Processed” (Arrested?) in NM After Declining to Show ID

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 16, 2009, 2:53 pm
  #46  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Washington, D.C.
Programs: AA Gold, UA Silver, Hyatt Plat, SPG Gold, Hilton Gold, Marriott Silver, Hertz #1 Club Gold
Posts: 219
Should be interesting to see how this proceeds. My hunch is that the state will just decide not to press charges, leaving Phil without the "day in court" he seems to be seeking. Unless he decides to sue them in federal court for violating his civil rights, which is an option--though he picked a lousy part of the country in terms of finding judges who are likely to be sympathetic to his argument. Should've done his homework first.
Mr. Mastodon Flyer is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 3:02 pm
  #47  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 8,956
It took six hours from the time of his arrest till he was booked? Guess they had to research what violations they could charge him with.
ND Sol is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 3:10 pm
  #48  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 15,352
Originally Posted by ND Sol
It took six hours from the time of his arrest till he was booked? Guess they had to research what violations they could charge him with.
Wonder if they broke out the Ouija board?

Can't wait to see if this gets some national press.
RichMSN is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 3:11 pm
  #49  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: FrostByte Falls, Mn
Programs: Holiday Inn Plat NW gold AA gold
Posts: 2,157
Originally Posted by ND Sol
It took six hours from the time of his arrest till he was booked? Guess they had to research what violations they could charge him with.
IMHO a total diaper load on the part of both TSA and the police department.

TSA has a procedure to deal with people who do not have a valid ID on them. Was that procedure followed in this case? Suspect that the SOP was not followed and the TSA supervisor had a bad case of 'my way or the highway' and called the police out of an act of vengeance. The police, not knowing any better, showed up to 'teach a rebellious citizen' his place in society.

Our government officials dropped the ball big time on this one.
AngryMiller is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 3:13 pm
  #50  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 15,352
Originally Posted by AngryMiller
IMHO a total diaper load on the part of both TSA and the police department.

TSA has a procedure to deal with people who do not have a valid ID on them. Was that procedure followed in this case? Suspect that the SOP was not followed and the TSA supervisor had a bad case of 'my way or the highway' and called the police out of an act of vengeance. The police, not knowing any better, showed up to 'teach a rebellious citizen' his place in society.

Our government officials dropped the ball big time on this one.
I wonder if the name discrepancy is because they just guessed on the spelling of his name. I'm sure he didn't spell it for them.
RichMSN is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 3:13 pm
  #51  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: FrostByte Falls, Mn
Programs: Holiday Inn Plat NW gold AA gold
Posts: 2,157
Originally Posted by RichMSN
Wonder if they broke out the Ouija board?

Can't wait to see if this gets some national press.
Gone international on it. Made a French blog.

French security blog.

Last edited by AngryMiller; Nov 16, 2009 at 3:20 pm Reason: Added link.
AngryMiller is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 3:17 pm
  #52  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,006
Originally Posted by AngryMiller
Gone international on it. Made a French blog.
Post the link.
Trollkiller is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 3:17 pm
  #53  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Purgatory
Programs: Too many to list. Status is a half dozen.
Posts: 9,235
Criminal trespass? Anyone speculate how that could potentially be valid?
ArizonaGuy is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 3:18 pm
  #54  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,201
Originally Posted by AngryMiller
....TSA has a procedure to deal with people who do not have a valid ID on them.....
The nuance that might have set the Smurfs aflutter could have been the difference between "Oops, I forgot my drivers license. What can we do?" and "Sorry, I'm not going to show you my ID".

Can any of our forum legal experts provide some context around how long it is legal to be held in a jail cell without formal charges, and beyond that, until arraigned?

Isn't there a time limit before Habeus Corpus is essentially violated?
bocastephen is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 3:22 pm
  #55  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,006
Phil's twitter page http://twitter.com/pmocek (no info yet, probably because he is still in jail)

A link to the blog story on Reddit, please upvote the story not my comment.
Trollkiller is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 3:24 pm
  #56  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
Originally Posted by ArizonaGuy
Criminal trespass? Anyone speculate how that could potentially be valid?
Disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer.

But if the airport management ordered the defendant to leave the premises, and the defendant refused, then the defendant could technically be trespassing on private property at that moment.

This argument requires a bunch of assumptions, of course. But you asked for speculation, so ...
jkhuggins is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 3:28 pm
  #57  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
I see Bob conveniently posted an ID blog post on PV today. However, no mention of Phil's arrest. Seems coincidental to say the least.

I thought about asking about it, but decided not to as I don't want to jeopardize Phil's case in any way.
Superguy is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 3:37 pm
  #58  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: FrostByte Falls, Mn
Programs: Holiday Inn Plat NW gold AA gold
Posts: 2,157
Originally Posted by bocastephen
The nuance that might have set the Smurfs aflutter could have been the difference between "Oops, I forgot my drivers license. What can we do?" and "Sorry, I'm not going to show you my ID".

Can any of our forum legal experts provide some context around how long it is legal to be held in a jail cell without formal charges, and beyond that, until arraigned?

Isn't there a time limit before Habeus Corpus is essentially violated?
Even still though, the TSO supervisor should have worked to deescalate the situation.
AngryMiller is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 3:37 pm
  #59  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Washington, D.C.
Programs: AA Gold, UA Silver, Hyatt Plat, SPG Gold, Hilton Gold, Marriott Silver, Hertz #1 Club Gold
Posts: 219
Originally Posted by jkhuggins
Disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer.

But if the airport management ordered the defendant to leave the premises, and the defendant refused, then the defendant could technically be trespassing on private property at that moment.

This argument requires a bunch of assumptions, of course. But you asked for speculation, so ...
I'm pretty sure there are cases where a property owner has said "you're welcome to come on to my property, but you can't bring any guns with you." Then somebody comes onto the property with a gun and gets popped for criminal trespass, because permission to enter the property was conditional and the trespasser violated the condition, thereby invaliding the permission. I suppose the state could make an analogous argument here: Travelers are granted permission to enter the airport property only on the condition that they not refuse to show ID if/when they're asked; Phil violated that condition and therefore was there without permission.

It's a terrible argument from a civil liberties perspective, because it converts every violation of the "house rules" into a crime, but prosecutors have tried it before.
Mr. Mastodon Flyer is offline  
Old Nov 16, 2009, 3:42 pm
  #60  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: AA Gold AAdvantage Elite, Rapids Reward
Posts: 38,324
Originally Posted by Spiff
Count me in for a contribution.
Me, too. I would likes to have more contribution with TSA is doing their own job.

Originally Posted by Italy98
Count me in for a contribution.

Which airline was he flying and is the airline doing anything to rectify the situation?
I am not sure where he is flying out of ABQ or not. He could be arrest as charge of criminal trespass. He does not have any proper without BP or ID, too.

Originally Posted by RichMSN

http://www.bernco.gov/upload/images/...0&bo=130573629

Disgraceful. Where do we send our contributions, again?
Yep, sure he did and he didn't listening with TSA officers and He must to be required to show ID all of the times. If you see someone who refusal entry into security checkpoint and he could be put into the secondary screening. I do not appreciate it for his behaviors today. Now, his bails is set $1000 bonds.

If they will have to obey with TSA regulations and show all of those passengers with identifications or driver license at TSA checkpoint. I knows all of those TSA rules all of the times and it is doing their own job, am I correct? I am very good TSA experience for a long time. If you see someone who trying to get through at checkpoint without ID or boarding pass. He could be arrest as trespassing. He will spent for 30 days in the county jails. He will have more appropriate behaviors to followed the policy from TSA.
N830MH is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.