![]() |
Originally Posted by HawkeyeFlyer
(Post 32632911)
... Curious what everyone thoughts were on CPC and what some overlooked benefits may be
|
Originally Posted by LAX
(Post 32653533)
Still better than what CPC offers, IMHO. However, BofA service DOES suck big time!
When comparing all non-private banking level top tier banking packages (Note - CPC is not a private banking package, as Chase also offers JPMorgan Private Bank), the best, or I should say the least worst is Wells Fargo. Yes indeed - everyone sucks. Why everyone sucks? The reason is quite simple - for most benefits, you can get them from Charles Schwab without a balance requirement. For those who offers a rate increase/decrease, the benefit is not as helpful as you choose CU (CUs generally have better interest rates). Safe deposit box is a benefit literally not in existence, given it is difficult to score a new box now. Wells Fargo is the least worst because it has the lowest requirement to qualify. As other may have mentioned, the beauty of CPC is 5/24 and the welcoming bonus. I do agree that BofA service sucks, based on my professional experience. Chase's service is standardized - not good, not bad. |
Originally Posted by garykung
(Post 32654862)
.... least worst is Wells Fargo. ....
|
Originally Posted by garykung
(Post 32654862)
That's not exactly what I mean.
When comparing all non-private banking level top tier banking packages (Note - CPC is not a private banking package, as Chase also offers JPMorgan Private Bank), the best, or I should say the least worst is Wells Fargo. Yes indeed - everyone sucks. Why everyone sucks? The reason is quite simple - for most benefits, you can get them from Charles Schwab without a balance requirement. For those who offers a rate increase/decrease, the benefit is not as helpful as you choose CU (CUs generally have better interest rates). Safe deposit box is a benefit literally not in existence, given it is difficult to score a new box now. Wells Fargo is the least worst because it has the lowest requirement to qualify. As other may have mentioned, the beauty of CPC is 5/24 and the welcoming bonus. I do agree that BofA service sucks, based on my professional experience. Chase's service is standardized - not good, not bad. LAX |
Originally Posted by garykung
(Post 32654862)
That's not exactly what I mean.
When comparing all non-private banking level top tier banking packages (Note - CPC is not a private banking package, as Chase also offers JPMorgan Private Bank), the best, or I should say the least worst is Wells Fargo. Yes indeed - everyone sucks. Why everyone sucks? The reason is quite simple - for most benefits, you can get them from Charles Schwab without a balance requirement. For those who offers a rate increase/decrease, the benefit is not as helpful as you choose CU (CUs generally have better interest rates). Safe deposit box is a benefit literally not in existence, given it is difficult to score a new box now. Wells Fargo is the least worst because it has the lowest requirement to qualify. As other may have mentioned, the beauty of CPC is 5/24 and the welcoming bonus. I do agree that BofA service sucks, based on my professional experience. Chase's service is standardized - not good, not bad.
Hope the pros/cons I encountered are useful for others to know - but each persons situation could be different - especially if the staff at local branches are different. EDIT: Customer service on Chase has been great - used Secure Message feature online and called - no issues. WF was not easy and so generally avoided trying to get them to do much - was too painful each time on phone and in branch. |
Originally Posted by LAX
(Post 32655207)
I wonder if the true private banking relationships (probably way too high for me to qualify) would actually offer worthwhile benefits.
Originally Posted by rapatelrocky
(Post 32655222)
While Chase CPC and WF Portolio are supposed to be "special" but basically they are primarily for "reduce the bank fees as much as possible" and try to get some useful banking services in the process.
FWIW - I am not opposing this kind of top-tier banking. Instead - before you are attracted to these, think about this - how exactly can you benefit this kind of accounts? If you say CPC will give you $2K for 250K, go for it. Otherwise, many published benefits are not worthy when you compare institutions like Schwab (Schwab offers ATM rebate worldwide, but not Fidelity or eTrade). |
Originally Posted by garykung
(Post 32655404)
Yes indeed.
Not exactly. Exactly. FWIW - I am not opposing this kind of top-tier banking. Instead - before you are attracted to these, think about this - how exactly can you benefit this kind of accounts? If you say CPC will give you $2K for 250K, go for it. Otherwise, many published benefits are not worthy when you compare institutions like Schwab (Schwab offers ATM rebate worldwide, but not Fidelity or eTrade). LAX |
Originally Posted by LAX
(Post 32655485)
Sorry for going OT, but unless it has changed recently, I did get my foreign ATM fee rebated by Fidelity 2 or 3 years ago.
"Please note that there may be a foreign transaction fee of 1% that is not waived, which will be included in the amount charged to your account." So I would say no. |
I just do not see any need to have Chase PC. Chase Sapphire gives me everything I need. The one special thing none of other competitors offer is the free wire transfer all around, in and out, domestic or overseas. You can easily save $40 for an outgoing transfer overseas. But if you never use it, then it is of little difference.
Other than that, the difference is very little. Schwabs does not have min balance requirement. Citi offers possible discount on some CC fees. BofA offers good Preferred Rewards program with CC bonus. But both Citi and Chase brokerage suck big. For ordinary folks, Schwabs is very good. But if you need to have a local branch, then pretty much anything goes. |
I think the international wire transfer benefit has been devalued by the competitor Transferwise which has had consistently lower rates than CPC rates.
The ATM refund aspect has also been devalued in my view by external circumstances as well; my primary use case for ATM refunds was international while traveling, and as an American, the short/medium term outlook on international travel is not good! |
Originally Posted by RedSun
(Post 32660168)
I just do not see any need to have Chase PC. Chase Sapphire gives me everything I need. The one special thing none of other competitors offer is the free wire transfer all around, in and out, domestic or overseas. You can easily save $40 for an outgoing transfer overseas. But if you never use it, then it is of little difference.
Other than that, the difference is very little. Schwabs does not have min balance requirement. Citi offers possible discount on some CC fees. BofA offers good Preferred Rewards program with CC bonus. But both Citi and Chase brokerage suck big. For ordinary folks, Schwabs is very good. But if you need to have a local branch, then pretty much anything goes. |
I have the Wells Fargo portfolio It's a good place to gather multiple accounts to avoid any fees but that's about it. All their products have walls between them so my local banker knows nothing about brokerage who knows nothing about Credit Cards etc.
Every time I talk to my "banker" they have to call someone else on the same number that I would call myself. I've become so frustrated with Wells that I can see now hoe the start up banks will succeed and dominate. The final straw was last week when my son (who is attached to my portfolio) had a cashiers check from BofA that he wanted to cash to buy a car. Wells wouldn't cash it. He had to deposit it and wait it to clear. On pushing them they said I could go into the branch to "guarantee" the funds with my account (even though they are linked. I agreed to do that then they said. Oh, wait we don't have $14,000 in cash on hand. We can give you $5,000 but it'll be iin 20's. End of rant........ |
Originally Posted by sdix
(Post 32711957)
I have the Wells Fargo portfolio It's a good place to gather multiple accounts to avoid any fees but that's about it. All their products have walls between them so my local banker knows nothing about brokerage who knows nothing about Credit Cards etc.
Originally Posted by sdix
(Post 32711957)
Every time I talk to my "banker" they have to call someone else on the same number that I would call myself.
Not just Wells, but industry-wide, each banker's authority is different. Just because a banker can do something, it does not his/her colleague can do that as well. Also - to avoid mistakes, a banker generally defers specialized issues to the respective specialists. For example, you want to re-finance? You will need to talk to a mortgage specialist.
Originally Posted by sdix
(Post 32711957)
The final straw was last week when my son (who is attached to my portfolio) had a cashiers check from BofA that he wanted to cash to buy a car. Wells wouldn't cash it. He had to deposit it and wait it to clear. On pushing them they said I could go into the branch to "guarantee" the funds with my account (even though they are linked.
You want cash? Only BofA can do that.
Originally Posted by sdix
(Post 32711957)
I agreed to do that then they said. Oh, wait we don't have $14,000 in cash on hand. We can give you $5,000 but it'll be iin 20's.
Also - $20 bill is more common in daily usage (many merchants do not accept $100 bill). So banks do not order bills they don't use. |
Originally Posted by garykung
(Post 32712352)
Don't blame Wells. Your rant is primarily based on your lack of knowledge.
|
Originally Posted by sdix
(Post 32712720)
I've been a customer of WFB since 1976 and have multiple accounts with them and at times large amounts on deposit. You show me 1 single WFB employee that can work with you on all their products. If you can then great. I suspect you can't
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:43 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.