Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Cathay Pacific | Cathay
Reload this Page >

CEO Rupert Hogg resigns; also other top execs

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

CEO Rupert Hogg resigns; also other top execs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 19, 2019, 2:52 am
  #76  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,342
Originally Posted by FlyPointyEnd
CAAC just turned Rupert Hogg into a Martyr...I think being the CEO, employees feel some sort of emnity towards him and the CX management specially after the cuts these past few years...but after last Friday you'd think people will be submitting his name to the Vatican to be made a saint.

CX was caught between the proverbial rock and a hard place, ultimatelty some executives had to be sacrified to the "Dragon" for CX to survive.
Well, he did sacrifice any chance of a cushy role within the Swire group, as is custom for ex-CX CEO's. China / Merlin seems to have made sure he will have nothing to do with Swire at all.
FlyPointyEnd likes this.
CX HK is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2019, 4:00 am
  #77  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 289
Originally Posted by CX HK
Merlin Swire probably had his mind on his other, more lucrative Swire businesses in China (Swire recently moved the head quarters of their Coca Cola business from HK to SH) instead of the "troublesome" CX.
https://www.just-drinks.com/news/swi..._id129010.aspx

The Coca-Cola bottler this week confirmed to just-drinks the move, which will see Swire's China base relocate from Hong Kong to Shanghai's Pudong. A spokesperson said the switch will help further expand business in China. The company's global headquarters will remain in Hong Kong.
rickywk is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2019, 4:17 am
  #78  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: None any more
Posts: 11,017
I used to be on the senior management team of a major telecoms company which did something similar about 15 years back. There were various tax incentives from the Communist Party for us to move our AsiaPac headquarters to Shanghai. But those incentives proved short-lived. The Communist Party representative in the corner at all managment meetings proved oppressive. And it didn't actually bring any significant benefits to our China business.

And that was with a team of people who were employed specifically to look after the families of senior party officials both in Shanghai and Beijing, and to send their wives on shopping trips, and their kids to education, in Europe, all at the company's expense.

The decision was, in effect, reversed a few years later.

So many companies have got burned trying to do business with the Communist Party that you would think people would have learned by now!

Last edited by christep; Aug 19, 2019 at 4:29 am
christep is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2019, 6:47 am
  #79  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Programs: Meh
Posts: 2,594
Originally Posted by christep
I used to be on the senior management team of a major telecoms company which did something similar about 15 years back. There were various tax incentives from the Communist Party for us to move our AsiaPac headquarters to Shanghai. But those incentives proved short-lived. The Communist Party representative in the corner at all managment meetings proved oppressive. And it didn't actually bring any significant benefits to our China business.

And that was with a team of people who were employed specifically to look after the families of senior party officials both in Shanghai and Beijing, and to send their wives on shopping trips, and their kids to education, in Europe, all at the company's expense.

The decision was, in effect, reversed a few years later.

So many companies have got burned trying to do business with the Communist Party that you would think people would have learned by now!
Very interesting.
stevie is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2019, 12:05 pm
  #80  
m.y
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC 75k, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 1,154
Originally Posted by christep
So many companies have got burned trying to do business with the Communist Party that you would think people would have learned by now!
Sounds like management just can't resist the temptation of short term gains to look good for the next quarterly/annual earnings.
m.y is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2019, 1:41 pm
  #81  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,875
Originally Posted by sunzi
I'll just say as CEO of a public company his first and foremost responsibility is to his shareholders. Whether you agree with it or not, it is just how it works.
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-49400885
Apparently a lot more than just me say it is not shareholders first
s0ssos is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2019, 4:22 pm
  #82  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 10


You have to love our Hong Kong black humor

WonTonMin is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2019, 4:41 am
  #83  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 170
I don’t understand how, after all this, people can say CX is becoming a mainland Chinese carrier??

They were the last in HK to bend to Beijing. HX did that so easily and so quietly that no one even had time to raise any eyebrows. You hear about CX staff protesting, but where’s the HX staff? CX crew has experienced and tried to refuse unreasonable searches and phone checks from Chinese airport security personnel. CX is getting all the flack from Beijing and HX is just there sipping its tea and nibbling it’s peanuts.

How does any of this make CX more mainland? If any, the lengths to which Beijing tried to kick CX when it was down and how Beijing sees CX as the opposition, goes to show how much CX is not mainland.

I’ve only got more admiration and sympathy for CX after all this.
Isochronous likes this.
hkgg is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2019, 5:23 am
  #84  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Programs: Marriott Titanium, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt Explorist, Marco Polo Gold
Posts: 1,084
Originally Posted by hkgg
I don’t understand how, after all this, people can say CX is becoming a mainland Chinese carrier??


Let's see. Their staff is now trained in China, their planes' maintenance done in China, most of their parts are now made by Chinese vendors (and we know the quality differences in that), etc. etc. But you're right, let's pretend they are not influence by China and Chinese airline culture at all.

They were the last in HK to bend to Beijing. HX did that so easily and so quietly that no one even had time to raise any eyebrows.
Because HX is owned by a Chinese airline, we would expect Swire to have some backbone, which they've proven they don't.

How does any of this make CX more mainland?
Because they have been since the hand-over, this event simply expose what has been going on for decades. In the past people like Hogg has been doing their best to balance the situation, but now, whatever balance that was there, is completely gone.
Cathay Dragon 666 is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2019, 5:57 am
  #85  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: None any more
Posts: 11,017
Originally Posted by Cathay Dragon 666
most of their parts are now made by Chinese vendors (and we know the quality differences in that)
30, or even 10, years ago, maybe some truth in that, but in these days of made in China iPhones, high speed trains, and, yes, Airbus planes I really don't think that sentiment is accurate.
christep is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2019, 9:41 am
  #86  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Programs: SPG Platinum
Posts: 1,686
Originally Posted by hkgg
I don’t understand how, after all this, people can say CX is becoming a mainland Chinese carrier??

They were the last in HK to bend to Beijing. HX did that so easily and so quietly that no one even had time to raise any eyebrows. You hear about CX staff protesting, but where’s the HX staff? CX crew has experienced and tried to refuse unreasonable searches and phone checks from Chinese airport security personnel. CX is getting all the flack from Beijing and HX is just there sipping its tea and nibbling it’s peanuts.

How does any of this make CX more mainland? If any, the lengths to which Beijing tried to kick CX when it was down and how Beijing sees CX as the opposition, goes to show how much CX is not mainland.

I’ve only got more admiration and sympathy for CX after all this.
Was there any coverage of what HX did?
Isochronous is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2019, 11:16 am
  #87  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 170
Originally Posted by Isochronous
Was there any coverage of what HX did?
I remember seeing a half page ad that they posted on a newspaper the day after the protests in the airport. Not sure whether it was after the first day or the second day of the protests. But the wording was much stronger than CX's, talking the inviolability of the One Country Two System arrangement and support for the government blah blah blah.
hkgg is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2019, 1:49 pm
  #88  
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 53
From Canada's Globe & Mail today:

Pilots and cabin crew at Hong Kong’s Cathay Pacific Airways described a “white terror” of political denunciations, sackings and phone searches by Chinese aviation officials amid anti-government protests gripping the former British colony.
Cathay, founded by an American and an Australian during British rule in 1946, was caught in the middle of the crisis 11 days ago, when China demanded it suspend staff involved in the protest movement.
The firm agreed, firing two pilots, but has since been plunged into turmoil after CEO Rupert Hogg was replaced last week.
Another pilot, Jeremy Tam, who is also a pro-democracy lawmaker, said on Tuesday that he and others had quit the airline as the internal political pressure was intolerable...

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/busi...ys-after-hong/
Resurrection is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2019, 3:19 pm
  #89  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NYC
Programs: pleb
Posts: 563
Originally Posted by Resurrection
From Canada's Globe & Mail today:

Pilots and cabin crew at Hong Kong’s Cathay Pacific Airways described a “white terror” of political denunciations, sackings and phone searches by Chinese aviation officials amid anti-government protests gripping the former British colony.
Cathay, founded by an American and an Australian during British rule in 1946, was caught in the middle of the crisis 11 days ago, when China demanded it suspend staff involved in the protest movement.
The firm agreed, firing two pilots, but has since been plunged into turmoil after CEO Rupert Hogg was replaced last week.
Another pilot, Jeremy Tam, who is also a pro-democracy lawmaker, said on Tuesday that he and others had quit the airline as the internal political pressure was intolerable...

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/busi...ys-after-hong/

yikes....
nightkhan is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2019, 9:23 pm
  #90  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Programs: SPG Platinum
Posts: 1,686
Is this the Chinese cabin crew collating names on their HK colleagues and circulating in their private Telegram group as alluded to in other reports?
Isochronous is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.